bybrooklyn/linux
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git synced 2026-04-18 06:44:00 -04:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Merge tag 'integrity-v6.6' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/zohar/linux-integrity

Browse Source 
Pull integrity subsystem updates from Mimi Zohar:

 - With commit 099f26f22f ("integrity: machine keyring CA
   configuration") certificates may be loaded onto the IMA keyring,
   directly or indirectly signed by keys on either the "builtin" or the
   "machine" keyrings.

   With the ability for the system/machine owner to sign the IMA policy
   itself without needing to recompile the kernel, update the IMA
   architecture specific policy rules to require the IMA policy itself
   be signed.

   [ As commit 099f26f22f was upstreamed in linux-6.4, updating the
     IMA architecture specific policy now to require signed IMA policies
     may break userspace expectations. ]

 - IMA only checked the file data hash was not on the system blacklist
   keyring for files with an appended signature (e.g. kernel modules,
   Power kernel image).

   Check all file data hashes regardless of how it was signed

 - Code cleanup, and a kernel-doc update

* tag 'integrity-v6.6' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/zohar/linux-integrity:
  kexec_lock: Replace kexec_mutex() by kexec_lock() in two comments
  ima: require signed IMA policy when UEFI secure boot is enabled
  integrity: Always reference the blacklist keyring with appraisal
  ima: Remove deprecated IMA_TRUSTED_KEYRING Kconfig
This commit is contained in:
Linus Torvalds
2023-08-30 09:16:56 -07:00
parent 1086eeac9c 55e2b69649
commit 1a35914f73
8 changed files with 24 additions and 38 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

17
security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
View File

@@ -1280,7 +1280,7 @@ static bool ima_validate_rule(struct ima_rule_entry *entry)
IMA_FSNAME | IMA_GID | IMA_EGID |
IMA_FGROUP | IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED |
IMA_PERMIT_DIRECTIO | IMA_VALIDATE_ALGOS |
IMA_VERITY_REQUIRED))
IMA_CHECK_BLACKLIST | IMA_VERITY_REQUIRED))
return false;
break;
@@ -1355,7 +1355,7 @@ static bool ima_validate_rule(struct ima_rule_entry *entry)
/* Ensure that combinations of flags are compatible with each other */
if (entry->flags & IMA_CHECK_BLACKLIST &&
!(entry->flags & IMA_MODSIG_ALLOWED))
!(entry->flags & IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED))
return false;
/*
@@ -1803,11 +1803,11 @@ static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, struct ima_rule_entry *entry)
if (entry->flags & IMA_VERITY_REQUIRED)
result = -EINVAL;
else
entry->flags |= IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED;
entry->flags |= IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED | IMA_CHECK_BLACKLIST;
} else if (strcmp(args[0].from, "sigv3") == 0) {
/* Only fsverity supports sigv3 for now */
if (entry->flags & IMA_VERITY_REQUIRED)
entry->flags |= IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED;
entry->flags |= IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED | IMA_CHECK_BLACKLIST;
else
result = -EINVAL;
} else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE_MODSIG) &&
@@ -1816,18 +1816,13 @@ static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, struct ima_rule_entry *entry)
result = -EINVAL;
else
entry->flags |= IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED |
IMA_MODSIG_ALLOWED;
IMA_MODSIG_ALLOWED | IMA_CHECK_BLACKLIST;
} else {
result = -EINVAL;
}
break;
case Opt_appraise_flag:
ima_log_string(ab, "appraise_flag", args[0].from);
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE_MODSIG) &&
strstr(args[0].from, "blacklist"))
entry->flags |= IMA_CHECK_BLACKLIST;
else
result = -EINVAL;
break;
case Opt_appraise_algos:
ima_log_string(ab, "appraise_algos", args[0].from);
@@ -2271,8 +2266,6 @@ int ima_policy_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
}
if (entry->flags & IMA_VERITY_REQUIRED)
seq_puts(m, "digest_type=verity ");
if (entry->flags & IMA_CHECK_BLACKLIST)
seq_puts(m, "appraise_flag=check_blacklist ");
if (entry->flags & IMA_PERMIT_DIRECTIO)
seq_puts(m, "permit_directio ");
rcu_read_unlock();