drm/amdgpu: don't access invalid sched

Since 2320c9e6a7 ("drm/sched: memset() 'job' in drm_sched_job_init()")
accessing job->base.sched can produce unexpected results as the initialisation
of (*job)->base.sched done in amdgpu_job_alloc is overwritten by the
memset.

This commit fixes an issue when a CS would fail validation and would
be rejected after job->num_ibs is incremented. In this case,
amdgpu_ib_free(ring->adev, ...) will be called, which would crash the
machine because the ring value is bogus.

To fix this, pass a NULL pointer to amdgpu_ib_free(): we can do this
because the device is actually not used in this function.

The next commit will remove the ring argument completely.

Fixes: 2320c9e6a7 ("drm/sched: memset() 'job' in drm_sched_job_init()")
Signed-off-by: Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer <pierre-eric.pelloux-prayer@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
This commit is contained in:
Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer
2024-12-06 13:17:45 +01:00
committed by Alex Deucher
parent 6f685a8134
commit 2ae520cb12

View File

@@ -255,7 +255,6 @@ void amdgpu_job_set_resources(struct amdgpu_job *job, struct amdgpu_bo *gds,
void amdgpu_job_free_resources(struct amdgpu_job *job)
{
struct amdgpu_ring *ring = to_amdgpu_ring(job->base.sched);
struct dma_fence *f;
unsigned i;
@@ -268,7 +267,7 @@ void amdgpu_job_free_resources(struct amdgpu_job *job)
f = NULL;
for (i = 0; i < job->num_ibs; ++i)
amdgpu_ib_free(ring->adev, &job->ibs[i], f);
amdgpu_ib_free(NULL, &job->ibs[i], f);
}
static void amdgpu_job_free_cb(struct drm_sched_job *s_job)