perf test: BP tests, remove is_supported use

Migrate the is_supported functionality to returning TEST_SKIP.
Motivation is kunit has no is_supported function.

Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Tested-by: Sohaib Mohamed <sohaib.amhmd@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Paul Clarke <pc@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211104064208.3156807-20-irogers@google.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>

tools/perf/tests/tests.h

@@ -151,7 +151,26 @@ DECLARE_SUITE(expand_cgroup_events);
 DECLARE_SUITE(perf_time_to_tsc);
 DECLARE_SUITE(dlfilter);
 
-bool test__bp_signal_is_supported(void);
+/*
+ * PowerPC and S390 do not support creation of instruction breakpoints using the
+ * perf_event interface.
+ *
+ * ARM requires explicit rounding down of the instruction pointer in Thumb mode,
+ * and then requires the single-step to be handled explicitly in the overflow
+ * handler to avoid stepping into the SIGIO handler and getting stuck on the
+ * breakpointed instruction.
+ *
+ * Since arm64 has the same issue with arm for the single-step handling, this
+ * case also gets stuck on the breakpointed instruction.
+ *
+ * Just disable the test for these architectures until these issues are
+ * resolved.
+ */
+#if defined(__powerpc__) || defined(__s390x__) || defined(__arm__) || defined(__aarch64__)
+#define BP_SIGNAL_IS_SUPPORTED 0
+#else
+#define BP_SIGNAL_IS_SUPPORTED 1
+#endif
 
 #ifdef HAVE_DWARF_UNWIND_SUPPORT
 struct thread;