treewide: drop outdated compiler version remarks in Kconfig help texts

As of writing, Documentation/Changes states the minimal versions of GNU C
being 8.1, Clang being 15.0.0 and binutils being 2.30.  A few Kconfig help
texts are pointing out that specific GCC and Clang versions are needed,
but by now, those pointers to versions, such later than 4.0, later than
4.4, or clang later than 5.0, are obsolete and unlikely to be found by
users configuring their kernel builds anyway.

Drop these outdated remarks in Kconfig help texts referring to older
compiler and binutils versions.  No functional change.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20251010082138.185752-1-lukas.bulwahn@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@redhat.com>
Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>
Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Cc: Russel King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Lukas Bulwahn
2025-10-10 10:21:38 +02:00
committed by Andrew Morton
parent 02582ac3b7
commit cd4eaccc00
3 changed files with 9 additions and 15 deletions

View File

@@ -232,17 +232,14 @@ config HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
config ARCH_USE_BUILTIN_BSWAP
bool
help
Modern versions of GCC (since 4.4) have builtin functions
for handling byte-swapping. Using these, instead of the old
inline assembler that the architecture code provides in the
__arch_bswapXX() macros, allows the compiler to see what's
happening and offers more opportunity for optimisation. In
particular, the compiler will be able to combine the byteswap
with a nearby load or store and use load-and-swap or
store-and-swap instructions if the architecture has them. It
should almost *never* result in code which is worse than the
hand-coded assembler in <asm/swab.h>. But just in case it
does, the use of the builtins is optional.
GCC and Clang have builtin functions for handling byte-swapping.
Using these allows the compiler to see what's happening and
offers more opportunity for optimisation. In particular, the
compiler will be able to combine the byteswap with a nearby load
or store and use load-and-swap or store-and-swap instructions if
the architecture has them. It should almost *never* result in code
which is worse than the hand-coded assembler in <asm/swab.h>.
But just in case it does, the use of the builtins is optional.
Any architecture with load-and-swap or store-and-swap
instructions should set this. And it shouldn't hurt to set it