Pull scheduler updates from Ingo Molnar:
"Fair scheduling updates:
- Skip SCHED_IDLE rq for SCHED_IDLE tasks (Christian Loehle)
- Remove superfluous rcu_read_lock() in the wakeup path (K Prateek Nayak)
- Simplify the entry condition for update_idle_cpu_scan() (K Prateek Nayak)
- Simplify SIS_UTIL handling in select_idle_cpu() (K Prateek Nayak)
- Avoid overflow in enqueue_entity() (K Prateek Nayak)
- Update overutilized detection (Vincent Guittot)
- Prevent negative lag increase during delayed dequeue (Vincent Guittot)
- Clear buddies for preempt_short (Vincent Guittot)
- Implement more complex proportional newidle balance (Peter Zijlstra)
- Increase weight bits for avg_vruntime (Peter Zijlstra)
- Use full weight to __calc_delta() (Peter Zijlstra)
RT and DL scheduling updates:
- Fix incorrect schedstats for rt and dl thread (Dengjun Su)
- Skip group schedulable check with rt_group_sched=0 (Michal Koutný)
- Move group schedulability check to sched_rt_global_validate()
(Michal Koutný)
- Add reporting of runtime left & abs deadline to sched_getattr()
for DEADLINE tasks (Tommaso Cucinotta)
Scheduling topology updates by K Prateek Nayak:
- Compute sd_weight considering cpuset partitions
- Extract "imb_numa_nr" calculation into a separate helper
- Allocate per-CPU sched_domain_shared in s_data
- Switch to assigning "sd->shared" from s_data
- Remove sched_domain_shared allocation with sd_data
Energy-aware scheduling updates:
- Filter false overloaded_group case for EAS (Vincent Guittot)
- PM: EM: Switch to rcu_dereference_all() in wakeup path
(Dietmar Eggemann)
Infrastructure updates:
- Replace use of system_unbound_wq with system_dfl_wq (Marco Crivellari)
Proxy scheduling updates by John Stultz:
- Make class_schedulers avoid pushing current, and get rid of proxy_tag_curr()
- Minimise repeated sched_proxy_exec() checking
- Fix potentially missing balancing with Proxy Exec
- Fix and improve task::blocked_on et al handling
- Add assert_balance_callbacks_empty() helper
- Add logic to zap balancing callbacks if we pick again
- Move attach_one_task() and attach_task() helpers to sched.h
- Handle blocked-waiter migration (and return migration)
- Add K Prateek Nayak to scheduler reviewers for proxy execution
Misc cleanups and fixes by John Stultz, Joseph Salisbury, Peter
Zijlstra, K Prateek Nayak, Michal Koutný, Randy Dunlap, Shrikanth
Hegde, Vincent Guittot, Zhan Xusheng, Xie Yuanbin and Vincent Guittot"
* tag 'sched-core-2026-04-13' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (46 commits)
sched/eevdf: Clear buddies for preempt_short
sched/rt: Cleanup global RT bandwidth functions
sched/rt: Move group schedulability check to sched_rt_global_validate()
sched/rt: Skip group schedulable check with rt_group_sched=0
sched/fair: Avoid overflow in enqueue_entity()
sched: Use u64 for bandwidth ratio calculations
sched/fair: Prevent negative lag increase during delayed dequeue
sched/fair: Use sched_energy_enabled()
sched: Handle blocked-waiter migration (and return migration)
sched: Move attach_one_task and attach_task helpers to sched.h
sched: Add logic to zap balance callbacks if we pick again
sched: Add assert_balance_callbacks_empty helper
sched/locking: Add special p->blocked_on==PROXY_WAKING value for proxy return-migration
sched: Fix modifying donor->blocked on without proper locking
locking: Add task::blocked_lock to serialize blocked_on state
sched: Fix potentially missing balancing with Proxy Exec
sched: Minimise repeated sched_proxy_exec() checking
sched: Make class_schedulers avoid pushing current, and get rid of proxy_tag_curr()
MAINTAINERS: Add K Prateek Nayak to scheduler reviewers
sched/core: Get this cpu once in ttwu_queue_cond()
...
So far, we have been able to utilize the mutex::wait_lock
for serializing the blocked_on state, but when we move to
proxying across runqueues, we will need to add more state
and a way to serialize changes to this state in contexts
where we don't hold the mutex::wait_lock.
So introduce the task::blocked_lock, which nests under the
mutex::wait_lock in the locking order, and rework the locking
to use it.
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260324191337.1841376-5-jstultz@google.com
Instead of embedding a list_head in struct mutex, store a pointer to
the first waiter. The list of waiters remains a doubly linked list so
we can efficiently add to the tail of the list, remove from the front
(or middle) of the list.
Some of the list manipulation becomes more complicated, but it's a
reasonable tradeoff on the slow paths to shrink data structures which
embed a mutex like struct file.
Some of the debug checks have to be deleted because there's no equivalent
to checking them in the new scheme (eg an empty waiter->list now means
that it is the only waiter, not that the waiter is no longer on the list).
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260305195545.3707590-4-willy@infradead.org
mutex_init() invokes __mutex_init() providing the name of the lock and
a pointer to a the lock class. With LOCKDEP enabled this information is
useful but without LOCKDEP it not used at all. Passing the pointer
information of the lock class might be considered negligible but the
name of the lock is passed as well and the string is stored. This
information is wasting storage.
Split __mutex_init() into a _genereic() variant doing the initialisation
of the lock and a _lockdep() version which does _genereic() plus the
lockdep bits. Restrict the lockdep version to lockdep enabled builds
allowing the compiler to remove the unused parameter.
This results in the following size reduction:
text data bss dec filename
| 30237599 8161430 1176624 39575653 vmlinux.defconfig
| 30233269 8149142 1176560 39558971 vmlinux.defconfig.patched
-4.2KiB -12KiB
| 32455099 8471098 12934684 53860881 vmlinux.defconfig.lockdep
| 32455100 8471098 12934684 53860882 vmlinux.defconfig.patched.lockdep
| 27152407 7191822 2068040 36412269 vmlinux.defconfig.preempt_rt
| 27145937 7183630 2067976 36397543 vmlinux.defconfig.patched.preempt_rt
-6.3KiB -8KiB
| 29382020 7505742 13784608 50672370 vmlinux.defconfig.preempt_rt.lockdep
| 29376229 7505742 13784544 50666515 vmlinux.defconfig.patched.preempt_rt.lockdep
-5.6KiB
[peterz: folded fix from boqun]
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20251125145425.68319-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251105142350.Tfeevs2N@linutronix.de
Track the blocked-on relation for mutexes, to allow following this
relation at schedule time.
task
| blocked-on
v
mutex
| owner
v
task
This all will be used for tracking blocked-task/mutex chains
with the prox-execution patch in a similar fashion to how
priority inheritance is done with rt_mutexes.
For serialization, blocked-on is only set by the task itself
(current). And both when setting or clearing (potentially by
others), is done while holding the mutex::wait_lock.
[minor changes while rebasing]
[jstultz: Fix blocked_on tracking in __mutex_lock_common in error paths]
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Connor O'Brien <connoro@google.com>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250712033407.2383110-3-jstultz@google.com
Using of devm API leads to a certain order of releasing resources.
So all dependent resources which are not devm-wrapped should be deleted
with respect to devm-release order. Mutex is one of such objects that
often is bound to other resources and has no own devm wrapping.
Since mutex_destroy() actually does nothing in non-debug builds
frequently calling mutex_destroy() is just ignored which is safe for now
but wrong formally and can lead to a problem if mutex_destroy() will be
extended so introduce devm_mutex_init().
Suggested-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: George Stark <gnstark@salutedevices.com>
Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Marek Behún <kabel@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240411161032.609544-2-gnstark@salutedevices.com
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
When a interruptible mutex locker is interrupted by a signal
without acquiring this lock and removed from the wait queue.
if the mutex isn't contended enough to have a waiter
put into the wait queue again, the setting of the WAITER
bit will force mutex locker to go into the slowpath to
acquire the lock every time, so if the wait queue is empty,
the WAITER bit need to be clear.
Fixes: 040a0a3710 ("mutex: Add support for wound/wait style locks")
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210517034005.30828-1-qiang.zhang@windriver.com
Extend lockdep to validate lock wait-type context.
The current wait-types are:
LD_WAIT_FREE, /* wait free, rcu etc.. */
LD_WAIT_SPIN, /* spin loops, raw_spinlock_t etc.. */
LD_WAIT_CONFIG, /* CONFIG_PREEMPT_LOCK, spinlock_t etc.. */
LD_WAIT_SLEEP, /* sleeping locks, mutex_t etc.. */
Where lockdep validates that the current lock (the one being acquired)
fits in the current wait-context (as generated by the held stack).
This ensures that there is no attempt to acquire mutexes while holding
spinlocks, to acquire spinlocks while holding raw_spinlocks and so on. In
other words, its a more fancy might_sleep().
Obviously RCU made the entire ordeal more complex than a simple single
value test because RCU can be acquired in (pretty much) any context and
while it presents a context to nested locks it is not the same as it
got acquired in.
Therefore its necessary to split the wait_type into two values, one
representing the acquire (outer) and one representing the nested context
(inner). For most 'normal' locks these two are the same.
[ To make static initialization easier we have the rule that:
.outer == INV means .outer == .inner; because INV == 0. ]
It further means that its required to find the minimal .inner of the held
stack to compare against the outer of the new lock; because while 'normal'
RCU presents a CONFIG type to nested locks, if it is taken while already
holding a SPIN type it obviously doesn't relax the rules.
Below is an example output generated by the trivial test code:
raw_spin_lock(&foo);
spin_lock(&bar);
spin_unlock(&bar);
raw_spin_unlock(&foo);
[ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
-----------------------------
swapper/0/1 is trying to lock:
ffffc90000013f20 (&bar){....}-{3:3}, at: kernel_init+0xdb/0x187
other info that might help us debug this:
1 lock held by swapper/0/1:
#0: ffffc90000013ee0 (&foo){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: kernel_init+0xd1/0x187
The way to read it is to look at the new -{n,m} part in the lock
description; -{3:3} for the attempted lock, and try and match that up to
the held locks, which in this case is the one: -{2,2}.
This tells that the acquiring lock requires a more relaxed environment than
presented by the lock stack.
Currently only the normal locks and RCU are converted, the rest of the
lockdep users defaults to .inner = INV which is ignored. More conversions
can be done when desired.
The check for spinlock_t nesting is not enabled by default. It's a separate
config option for now as there are known problems which are currently
addressed. The config option allows to identify these problems and to
verify that the solutions found are indeed solving them.
The config switch will be removed and the checks will permanently enabled
once the vast majority of issues has been addressed.
[ bigeasy: Move LD_WAIT_FREE,… out of CONFIG_LOCKDEP to avoid compile
failure with CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK + !CONFIG_LOCKDEP]
[ tglx: Add the config option ]
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200321113242.427089655@linutronix.de
lockdep_assert_held() is better suited to checking locking requirements,
since it only checks if the current thread holds the lock regardless of
whether someone else does. This is also a step towards possibly removing
spin_is_locked().
Signed-off-by: Lance Roy <ldr709@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
The current mutex implementation has an atomic lock word and a
non-atomic owner field.
This disparity leads to a number of issues with the current mutex code
as it means that we can have a locked mutex without an explicit owner
(because the owner field has not been set, or already cleared).
This leads to a number of weird corner cases, esp. between the
optimistic spinning and debug code. Where the optimistic spinning
code needs the owner field updated inside the lock region, the debug
code is more relaxed because the whole lock is serialized by the
wait_lock.
Also, the spinning code itself has a few corner cases where we need to
deal with a held lock without an owner field.
Furthermore, it becomes even more of a problem when trying to fix
starvation cases in the current code. We end up stacking special case
on special case.
To solve this rework the basic mutex implementation to be a single
atomic word that contains the owner and uses the low bits for extra
state.
This matches how PI futexes and rt_mutex already work. By having the
owner an integral part of the lock state a lot of the problems
dissapear and we get a better option to deal with starvation cases,
direct owner handoff.
Changing the basic mutex does however invalidate all the arch specific
mutex code; this patch leaves that unused in-place, a later patch will
remove that.
Tested-by: Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
None of the code actually wants a thread_info, it all wants a
task_struct, and it's just converting back and forth between the two
("ti->task" to get the task_struct from the thread_info, and
"task_thread_info(task)" to go the other way).
No semantic change.
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
OK, so commit:
1d8fe7dc80 ("locking/mutexes: Unlock the mutex without the wait_lock")
generates this boot warning when CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES=y:
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 139 at /usr/src/linux-2.6/kernel/locking/mutex-debug.c:82 debug_mutex_unlock+0x155/0x180() DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(lock->owner != current)
And that makes sense, because as soon as we release the lock a
new owner can come in...
One would think that !__mutex_slowpath_needs_to_unlock()
implementations suffer the same, but for DEBUG we fall back to
mutex-null.h which has an unconditional 1 for that.
The mutex debug code requires the mutex to be unlocked after
doing the debug checks, otherwise it can find inconsistent
state.
Reported-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: jason.low2@hp.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140312122442.GB27965@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
When mutex debugging is enabled and an imbalanced mutex_unlock()
is called, we get the following, slightly confusing warning:
[ 364.208284] DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(lock->owner != current)
But in that case the warning is due to an imbalanced mutex_unlock() call,
and the lock->owner is NULL - so the message is misleading.
So improve the message by testing for this case specifically:
DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!lock->owner)
Signed-off-by: Liu, Chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1386136693.3650.48.camel@cliu38-desktop-build
[ Improved the changelog, changed the patch to use !lock->owner consistently. ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
