[Why]
Memory allocation occurs within dml21_validate() for adding phantom planes.
May cause kernel to be tainted due to usage of FP Start.
[How]
Move FP start from dml21_validate to before mode programming/mode support.
Calculations requiring floating point are all done within mode programming
or mode support.
Reviewed-by: Alvin Lee <alvin.lee2@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Austin Zheng <Austin.Zheng@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Ray Wu <ray.wu@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
(cherry picked from commit fe3250f108)
[Why]
"BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context" error.
after:
"drm/amd/display: Protect FPU in dml2_validate()/dml21_validate()"
The populate_dml_plane_cfg_from_plane_state() uses the GFP_KERNEL flag
for memory allocation, which shouldn't be used in atomic contexts.
The allocation is needed only for using another helper function
get_scaler_data_for_plane().
[How]
Modify helpers to pass a pointer to scaler_data within existing context,
eliminating the need for dynamic memory allocation/deallocation
and copying.
Fixes: 366e77cd49 ("drm/amd/display: Protect FPU in dml2_validate()/dml21_validate()")
Reviewed-by: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Roman Li <Roman.Li@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Ray Wu <ray.wu@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
(cherry picked from commit bd3e84bc98)
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
[Why]
For some VR headsets with large blanks, it's possible
to overflow the OTG_VSTARTUP_PARAM:VSTARTUP_START
register. This can lead to incorrect DML calculations
and underflow downstream.
[How]
Min the calcualted max_vstartup_lines with the max
value of the register.
Reviewed-by: Dillon Varone <dillon.varone@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Ryan Seto <ryanseto@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Chung <chiahsuan.chung@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
Transitioning from low to high resolutions at high refresh rates caused grey corruption.
During the transition state, there is a period where plane size is based on low resultion
state and ODM slices are based on high resoultion state, causing the entire plane to be
contained in one ODM slice. DML2 would turn off the pipe for the ODM slice with no plane,
causing an underflow since the pixel rate for the higher resolution cannot be supported on
one pipe. This change stops DML2 from turning off pipes that are mapped to an ODM slice
with no plane. This is possible to do without negative consequences because pipes can now
take the minimum viewport and draw with zero recout size, removing the need to have the
pipe turned off.
[How]
In map_pipes_from_plane(), remove "check" that skips ODM slices that are not covered by
the plane. This prevents the pipes for those ODM slices from being freed.
Reviewed-by: Ovidiu Bunea <ovidiu.bunea@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Katsnelson <mike.katsnelson@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Zaeem Mohamed <zaeem.mohamed@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
The informative structure needs to be extended by the total number of DPPs
required per each active plane.
The new informative field is going to be used as a statistical indicator.
[How]
The dml2_core_calcs_get_informative() routine must count a total number of DPPs.
Reviewed-by: Austin Zheng <austin.zheng@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Oleh Kuzhylnyi <okuzhyln@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Roman Li <roman.li@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[why]
currently dml2 is using a hard coded 16 to convert memclk to dram_speed_mts.
for apu, this depends on wck_ratio.
change to pass the already calculated dram_speed_mts from fpu to dml2.
v2: use existing calculation of dram_speed_mts for now to avoid regression
Signed-off-by: Charlene Liu <Charlene.Liu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Roman Li <Roman.Li@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
1) The current calculations for OTO prefetch bandwidth do not consider the number of DPP pipes in use.
As a result, OTO prefetch bandwidth may be larger than the vactive bandwidth if multiple DPP pipes are used.
OTO prefetch bandwidth should never exceed the vactive bandwidth.
2) Mode programming may be mismatched with mode support
In cases where mode support has chosen to use the equalized (equ) prefetch schedule,
mode programming may end up using oto prefetch schedule instead.
The bandwidth required to do the oto schedule may end up being higher than the equ schedule.
This can cause the required urgent bandwidth to exceed the available urgent bandwidth.
[How]
Output the oto prefetch bandwidth and incorperate it into the urgent bandwidth calculations
even if the prefetch schedule being used is not the oto schedule.
Reviewed-by: Dillon Varone <dillon.varone@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Austin Zheng <Austin.Zheng@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Zaeem Mohamed <zaeem.mohamed@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why/How]
vBlank used to determine the max vStartup is based on the smallest between
the vblank provided by the timing and vblank in ip_caps.
Extra vblank time is not considered if the vblank provided by the timing ends
up being higher than what's defined by the ip_caps
Use 1 less than the vblank size in case the timing is interlaced
so vstartup will always be less than vblank_nom.
Reviewed-by: Dillon Varone <dillon.varone@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Austin Zheng <Austin.Zheng@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Wayne Lin <wayne.lin@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
There are a couple of statements with two following semicolons, replace
these with just one semicolon.
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Currently, there are several files in drm/amd/display that aim to have a
higher -Wframe-larger-than value to avoid instances of that warning with
a lower value from the user's configuration. However, with the way that
it is currently implemented, it does not respect the user's request via
CONFIG_FRAME_WARN for a higher stack frame limit, which can cause pain
when new instances of the warning appear and break the build due to
CONFIG_WERROR.
Adjust the logic to switch from a hard coded -Wframe-larger-than value
to only using the value as a minimum clamp and deferring to the
requested value from CONFIG_FRAME_WARN if it is higher.
Suggested-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Reported-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/2025013003-audience-opposing-7f95@gregkh/
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[WHAT & HOW]
hpo_stream_to_link_encoder_mapping has size MAX_HPO_DP2_ENCODERS(=4),
but location can have size up to 6. As a result, it is necessary to
check location against MAX_HPO_DP2_ENCODERS.
Similiarly, disp_cfg_stream_location can be used as an array index which
should be 0..5, so the ASSERT's conditions should be less without equal.
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/3904
Reviewed-by: Austin Zheng <Austin.Zheng@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <rodrigo.siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Hung <alex.hung@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
When compiling allmodconfig (CONFIG_WERROR=y) with clang-19, see the
following errors:
.../display/dc/dml2/display_mode_core.c:6268:13: warning: stack frame size (3128) exceeds limit (3072) in 'dml_prefetch_check' [-Wframe-larger-than]
.../display/dc/dml2/dml21/src/dml2_core/dml2_core_dcn4_calcs.c:7236:13: warning: stack frame size (3256) exceeds limit (3072) in 'dml_core_mode_support' [-Wframe-larger-than]
Mark static functions called by dml_prefetch_check() and
dml_core_mode_support() noinline_for_stack to avoid them become huge
functions and thus exceed the frame size limit.
A way to reproduce:
$ git checkout next-20250107
$ mkdir build_dir
$ export PATH=/tmp/llvm-19.1.6-x86_64/bin:$PATH
$ make LLVM=1 O=build_dir allmodconfig
$ make LLVM=1 O=build_dir drivers/gpu/drm/ -j
The way how it chose static functions to mark:
[0] Unset CONFIG_WERROR in build_dir/.config.
To get display_mode_core.o without errors.
[1] Get a function list called by dml_prefetch_check().
$ sed -n '6268,6711p' drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml2/display_mode_core.c \
| sed -n -r 's/.*\W(\w+)\(.*/\1/p' | sort -u >/tmp/syms
[2] Get the non-inline function list.
Objdump won't show the symbols if they are inline functions.
$ make LLVM=1 O=build_dir drivers/gpu/drm/ -j
$ objdump -d build_dir/.../display_mode_core.o | \
./scripts/checkstack.pl x86_64 0 | \
grep -f /tmp/syms | cut -d' ' -f2- >/tmp/orig
[3] Get the full function list.
Append "-fno-inline" to `CFLAGS_.../display_mode_core.o` in
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml2/Makefile.
$ make LLVM=1 O=build_dir drivers/gpu/drm/ -j
$ objdump -d build_dir/.../display_mode_core.o | \
./scripts/checkstack.pl x86_64 0 | \
grep -f /tmp/syms | cut -d' ' -f2- >/tmp/noinline
[4] Get the inline function list.
If a symbol only in /tmp/noinline but not in /tmp/orig, it is a good
candidate to mark noinline.
$ diff /tmp/orig /tmp/noinline
Chosen functions and their stack sizes:
CalculateBandwidthAvailableForImmediateFlip [display_mode_core.o]:144
CalculateExtraLatency [display_mode_core.o]:176
CalculateTWait [display_mode_core.o]:64
CalculateVActiveBandwithSupport [display_mode_core.o]:112
set_calculate_prefetch_schedule_params [display_mode_core.o]:48
CheckGlobalPrefetchAdmissibility [dml2_core_dcn4_calcs.o]:544
calculate_bandwidth_available [dml2_core_dcn4_calcs.o]:320
calculate_vactive_det_fill_latency [dml2_core_dcn4_calcs.o]:272
CalculateDCFCLKDeepSleep [dml2_core_dcn4_calcs.o]:208
CalculateODMMode [dml2_core_dcn4_calcs.o]:208
CalculateOutputLink [dml2_core_dcn4_calcs.o]:176
Signed-off-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
There are a few cleanup and refactoring tasks that need to be done
with the DML2.1 wrapper and DC interface to remove dependencies on
legacy structures and N-1 prototypes.
[How]
Implemented pipe_ctx->global_sync.
Implemented new functions to use pipe_ctx->hubp_regs and
pipe_ctx->global_sync:
- hubp_setup2
- hubp_setup_interdependent2
- Several other new functions for DCN 4.01 to support newer structures
Removed dml21_update_pipe_ctx_dchub_regs
Removed dml21_extract_legacy_watermark_set
Removed dml21_populate_pipe_ctx_dlg_param
Removed outdated dcn references in DML2.1 wrapper.
Reviewed-by: Austin Zheng <austin.zheng@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Dillon Varone <dillon.varone@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafal Ostrowski <rostrows@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Chung <chiahsuan.chung@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Commit 24909d9ec7 ("drm/amd/display: Overwriting dualDPP UBF values
before usage") added a new warning in dml2/display_mode_core.c when
building allmodconfig with clang:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml2/display_mode_core.c:6268:13: error: stack frame size (3128) exceeds limit (3072) in 'dml_prefetch_check' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than]
6268 | static void dml_prefetch_check(struct display_mode_lib_st *mode_lib)
| ^
Commit be4e350931 ("drm/amd/display: DML21 Reintegration For Various
Fixes") introduced one in dml2_core/dml2_core_dcn4_calcs.c with the same
configuration:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml2/dml21/src/dml2_core/dml2_core_dcn4_calcs.c:7236:13: error: stack frame size (3256) exceeds limit (3072) in 'dml_core_mode_support' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than]
7236 | static bool dml_core_mode_support(struct dml2_core_calcs_mode_support_ex *in_out_params)
| ^
In the case of the first warning, the stack usage was already at the
limit at the parent change, so the offending change was rather
innocuous. In the case of the second warning, there was a rather
dramatic increase in stack usage compared to the parent:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml2/dml21/src/dml2_core/dml2_core_dcn4_calcs.c:7032:13: error: stack frame size (2696) exceeds limit (2048) in 'dml_core_mode_support' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than]
7032 | static bool dml_core_mode_support(struct dml2_core_calcs_mode_support_ex *in_out_params)
| ^
This is an unfortunate interaction between an issue with stack slot
reuse in LLVM that gets exacerbated by sanitization (which gets enabled
with all{mod,yes}config) and function calls using a much higher number
of parameters than is typical in the kernel, necessitating passing most
of these values on the stack.
While it is possible that there should be source code changes to address
these warnings, this code is difficult to modify for various reasons, as
has been noted in other changes that have occurred for similar reasons,
such as commit 6740ec97bc ("drm/amd/display: Increase frame warning
limit with KASAN or KCSAN in dml2").
Increase the frame larger than limit when compile testing with clang and
the sanitizers enabled to avoid this breakage in all{mod,yes}config, as
they are commonly used and valuable testing targets. While it is not the
best to hide this issue, it is not really relevant when compile testing,
as the sanitizers are commonly stressful on optimizations and they are
only truly useful at runtime, which COMPILE_TEST states will not occur
with the current build.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202412121748.chuX4sap-lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
To ensure DML validation receives the correct tiling information,
such as swizzle mode or array mode, based on the active GFX format
[How]
- For new GFX format passed swizzle_mode to DML.
- For legacy GFX format passed array_mode to DML.
- Dynamically determined the appropriate tiling info based on the
active GFX format.
[Description]
This commit ensures that the correct GFX tiling information is passed
to DML. Depending on the active GFX format, the appropriate tiling info
is passed to DML. This change accommodates the different GFX formats
supported by latest platforms, ensuring compatibility and proper
DML validation.
Reviewed-by: Alvin Lee <alvin.lee2@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Karthi Kandasamy <karthi.kandasamy@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Roman Li <roman.li@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Commit 2563391e57 ("drm/amd/display: DML2.1 resynchronization") blew
away the compiler warning fix from commit 2fde4fdddc
("drm/amd/display: Avoid -Wenum-float-conversion in
add_margin_and_round_to_dfs_grainularity()"), causing the warning to
reappear.
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml2/dml21/src/dml2_dpmm/dml2_dpmm_dcn4.c:183:58: error: arithmetic between enumeration type 'enum dentist_divider_range' and floating-point type 'double' [-Werror,-Wenum-float-conversion]
183 | divider = (unsigned int)(DFS_DIVIDER_RANGE_SCALE_FACTOR * (vco_freq_khz / clock_khz));
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1 error generated.
Apply the fix again to resolve the warning.
Re-apply again after commit be4e350931 ("drm/amd/display: DML21 Reintegration For Various Fixes")
This should be making its way back to the original DML trees this time. (Alex)
Fixes: be4e350931 ("drm/amd/display: DML21 Reintegration For Various Fixes")
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/3841
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
Dropping the entirety of dml2_policy_build_synthetic_soc_states exposes
an issue for states that cannot be filled via bbox_overrides and rely on
the default parameters that may or may not be present depending on the
DM.
For amdgpu_dm this results in missing parameters for most of the struct
in higher states:
- sr_exit_time_us
- sr_enter_plus_exit_time_us
- sr_exit_z8_time_us
- sr_enter_plus_exit_z8_time_us
- urgent_latency_pixel_data_only_us
- urgent_latency_pixel_mixed_with_vm_data_us
- urgent_latency_vm_data_only_us
- dram_clock_change_latency_us
- fclk_change_latency_us
- usr_retraining_latency_us
- writeback_latency_us
- urgent_latency_adjustment_fabric_clock_component_us
- urgent_latency_adjustment_fabric_clock_reference_mhz
- dscclk_mhz
- phyclk_mhz
- phyclk_d18_mhz
- phyclk_d32_mhz
- use_ideal_dram_bw_strobe
[How]
Copy from the first state, applying a minimal policy to set max clocks
for SOC independent values.
Then copy the SOC dependent ones from the states modified by
bbox_overrides.
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <rodrigo.siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[WHY]
When effective bandwidth from the SoC is enough to perform SubVP
prefetchs, then DF throttling is not required.
[HOW]
Provide SMU the required clocks for which DF throttling is not required.
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alvin Lee <alvin.lee2@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Dillon Varone <dillon.varone@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <rodrigo.siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Current driver interface does not allow for flexibility in coexistence
of multiple interface versions, so add support for checking minor
interface revisions and providing appropriate programming.
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alvin Lee <alvin.lee2@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Dillon Varone <dillon.varone@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <rodrigo.siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[WHY]
Right now in dml2 mode validation we are calculating UBF parameters for
prefetch calculation for single and dual DPP scenarios. Data structure
to store such values are just 1D arrays, the single DPP values are
overwritten by the dualDPP values, and we end up using dualDPP for
prefetch calculations twice (once in place of singleDPP support check
and again for dual).
This naturally leads to many problems, one of which validating a mode in
"singleDPP" (when we used dual DPP parameters) and sending the singleDPP
parameters to mode programming, if we cannot support then we observe the
corruption as described in the ticket.
[HOW]
UBF values need to have 2d arrays to store values specific to single and
dual DPP states to avoid single DPP values being overwritten. Other
parameters are recorded on a per state basis such as prefetch UBF values
but they are in the same loop used for calculation and at that point its
fine to overwrite them, its not the case for plain UBF values.
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Ausef Yousof <Ausef.Yousof@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why/How]
Mismatch between mode support and mode programming occurs.
Mode support would calculate higher row vblank than mode programming.
As a result, mode programming fails and hardware isn't properly programmed.
Reviewed-by: Dillon Varone <dillon.varone@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Austin Zheng <Austin.Zheng@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[WHY]
Soft hang/lag observed during 10bit playback + moving cursor, corruption
observed in other tickets for same reason, also failing MPO.
1. Currently, we are always running
calculate_lowest_supported_state_for_temp_read which is only
necessary on dGPU
2. Fast validate path does not apply DET buffer allocation policy
3. Prefetch UrgBFactor chroma parameter not populated in prefetch
calculation
[HOW]
1. Add a check to see if we are on APU, if so, skip the code
2. Add det buffer alloc policy checks to fast validate path
3. Populate UrgentBurstChroma param in call to calculate
UrgBChroma prefetch values
-revision commits: small formatting/brackets/null check addition + remove test change + dGPU code
Reviewed-by: Charlene Liu <charlene.liu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Ausef Yousof <Ausef.Yousof@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Fangzhi Zuo <jerry.zuo@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
