Internal clock of AD719X devices can be made available on MCLK2 pin. Add
clock provider to support this functionality when clock cells property
is present.
The clock source can be either provided externally or the internal clock
is used. Pair of clocks and clock-names property is mutally exclusive
with #clock-cells property.
Modify second example to showcase the mode where internal clock is used.
Signed-off-by: Alisa-Dariana Roman <alisa.roman@analog.com>
Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240717212535.8348-4-alisa.roman@analog.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
There are actually 4 configuration modes of clock source for AD719X
devices. Either a crystal can be attached externally between MCLK1 and
MCLK2 pins, or an external CMOS-compatible clock can drive the MCLK2
pin. The other 2 modes make use of the 4.92MHz internal clock.
To configure external clock as either a crystal or a CMOS-compatible
clock, changing the register settings is necessary. Therefore, add clock
name xtal alongside mclk. By selecting one or the other, the register is
configured.
The presence of an external clock source is optional, not required. When
both clocks and clock-names properties are present, an external clock
source is used. If the intention is to use the internal clock, both
properties should be absent. Modify required properties accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Alisa-Dariana Roman <alisa.roman@analog.com>
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240717212535.8348-2-alisa.roman@analog.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The 'single-channel' property is an uint32, not an array, so 'items' is
an incorrect constraint. This didn't matter until dtschema recently
changed how properties are decoded. This results in this warning:
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/adi,ad7192.example.dtb: adc@0: \
channel@1:single-channel: 1 is not of type 'array'
Fixes: caf7b7632b ("dt-bindings: iio: adc: ad7192: Add AD7194 support")
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240723230904.1299744-1-robh@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
Instead of listing directly properties typical for SPI peripherals,
reference the spi-peripheral-props.yaml schema. This allows using all
properties typical for SPI-connected devices, even these which device
bindings author did not tried yet.
Remove the spi-* properties which now come via spi-peripheral-props.yaml
schema, except for the cases when device schema adds some constraints
like maximum frequency.
While changing additionalProperties->unevaluatedProperties, put it in
typical place, just before example DTS.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Marcus Folkesson <marcus.folkesson@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220816124321.67817-2-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
In cases where we don't reference another schema, 'additionalProperties'
can be used instead. This is preferred for now as 'unevaluatedProperties'
support isn't implemented yet.
In a few cases, this means adding some missing property definitions of
which most are for SPI bus properties. 'unevaluatedProperties' is not going
to work for the SPI bus properties anyways as they are evaluated from the
parent node, not the SPI child node.
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201005183830.486085-3-robh@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
This doesn't yet do anything in the tools, but make it explicit so we can
check either 'unevaluatedProperties' or 'additionalProperties' is present
in schemas.
'unevaluatedProperties' is appropriate when including another schema (via
'$ref') and all possible properties and/or child nodes are not
explicitly listed in the schema with the '$ref'.
This is in preparation to add a meta-schema to check for missing
'unevaluatedProperties' or 'additionalProperties'. This has been a
constant source of review issues.
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Acked-By: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Acked-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Acked-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201005183830.486085-2-robh@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
The example contains an SPI bus and device, but doesn't have the
appropriate size and address cells size.
This creates a DTC warning when the example is compiled since the default
ones will not match what the device uses. Let's add them to remove that
warning.
Fixes: f7356e4703 ("dt-bindings: iio: adc: ad7192: Add binding documentation for AD7192")
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
The AD7192 binding describes two regulator properties, avdd-supply and
dvdd-supply, but describes it as a constant string that must be avdd and
dvdd. This is wrong since a *-supply property is actually a phandle, and
results in warnings when the example is validated (or any device tree using
that device, for that matter).
Let's remove that requirement.
Fixes: f7356e4703 ("dt-bindings: iio: adc: ad7192: Add binding documentation for AD7192")
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
