According to downstream we should be setting RBBM_NC_MODE_CNTL to a
non-default value on a663 and a680, we don't support a663 and on a680
we're leaving it at the wrong (suboptimal) value. Just set it on all
GPUs. Similarly, plumb through level2_swizzling_dis which will be
necessary on a663.
ubwc_mode is expanded and renamed to ubwc_swizzle to match the name on
the display side. Similarly macrotile_mode should match the display
side.
Signed-off-by: Connor Abbott <cwabbott0@gmail.com>
Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/607397/
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
On all Qualcomm platforms with a7xx GPUs, qcom_scm provides a method to
initialize cx_mem. Copy this from downstream (minus BCL which we
currently don't support). On a750, this includes a new "fuse" register
which can be used by qcom_scm to fuse off certain features like
raytracing in software. The fuse is default off, and is initialized by
calling the method. Afterwards we have to read it to find out which
features were enabled.
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Connor Abbott <cwabbott0@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/592042/
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
The A702 is a weird mix of 600 and 700 series.. Perhaps even a
testing ground for some A7xx features with good ol' A6xx silicon.
It's basically A610 that's been beefed up with some new registers
and hw features (like APRIV!), that was then cut back in size,
memory bus and some other ways.
Add support for it, tested with QCM2290 / RB1.
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/579752/
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
Add support for the A750 GPU found on the SM8650 platform
Unlike the the very close A740 GPU on the SM8550 SoC, the A750 GPU
doesn't have an HWCFG block but a separate register set.
The A750 GPU info are added under the adreno_is_a750() macro and
the ADRENO_7XX_GEN3 family id.
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/578693/
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
Add support for the Adreno 305B GPU that is found in MSM8226(v2) SoC.
Previously this was mistakenly claimed to be supported but using wrong
a configuration.
In MSM8226v1 there's also a A305B but with chipid 0x03000510 which
should work with the same configuration but due to lack of hardware for
testing this is not added.
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@z3ntu.xyz>
Reviewed-by: David Heidelberg <david@ixit.cz>
Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/575274/
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
A7xx GPUs are - from kernel's POV anyway - basically another generation
of A6xx. They build upon the A650/A660_family advancements, skipping some
writes (presumably more values are preset correctly on reset), adding
some new ones and changing others.
One notable difference is the introduction of a second shadow, called BV.
To handle this with the current code, allocate it right after the current
RPTR shadow.
BV handling and .submit are mostly based on Jonathan Marek's work.
All A7xx GPUs are assumed to have a GMU.
A702 is not an A7xx-class GPU, it's a weird forked A610.
Tested-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org> # on SM8550-QRD
Tested-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> # sm8450
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/559285/
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
Since the revision becomes an opaque identifier with future GPUs, move
away from treating different ranges of bits as having a given meaning.
This means that we need to explicitly list different patch revisions in
the device table.
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/549782/
A610 is one of (if not the) lowest-tier SKUs in the A6XX family. It
features no GMU, as it's implemented solely on SoCs with SMD_RPM.
What's more interesting is that it does not feature a VDDGX line
either, being powered solely by VDDCX and has an unfortunate hardware
quirk that makes its reset line broken - after a couple of assert/
deassert cycles, it will hang for good and will not wake up again.
This GPU requires mesa changes for proper rendering, and lots of them
at that. The command streams are quite far away from any other A6XX
GPU and hence it needs special care. This patch was validated both
by running an (incomplete) downstream mesa with some hacks (frames
rendered correctly, though some instructions made the GPU hangcheck
which is expected - garbage in, garbage out) and by replaying RD
traces captured with the downstream KGSL driver - no crashes there,
ever.
Add support for this GPU on the kernel side, which comes down to
pretty simply adding A612 HWCG tables, altering a few values and
adding a special case for handling the reset line.
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/542779/
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
Some (particularly SMD_RPM, a.k.a non-RPMh) SoCs implement A6XX GPUs
but don't implement the associated GMUs. This is due to the fact that
the GMU directly pokes at RPMh. Sadly, this means we have to take care
of enabling & scaling power rails, clocks and bandwidth ourselves.
Reuse existing Adreno-common code and modify the deeply-GMU-infused
A6XX code to facilitate these GPUs. This involves if-ing out lots
of GMU callbacks and introducing a new type of GMU - GMU wrapper (it's
the actual name that Qualcomm uses in their downstream kernels).
This is essentially a register region which is convenient to model
as a device. We'll use it for managing the GDSCs. The register
layout matches the actual GMU_CX/GX regions on the "real GMU" devices
and lets us reuse quite a bit of gmu_read/write/rmw calls.
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/542766/
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
Change adreno_is_a690() prototype to accept the const struct adreno_gpu
pointer instead of a non-const one. This fixes the following warning:
In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c:33:
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h: In function ‘adreno_is_a660_family’:
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h:303:54: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘adreno_is_a690’ discards ‘const’ qualifier from pointer target type [-Wdiscarded-qualifiers]
303 | return adreno_is_a660(gpu) || adreno_is_a690(gpu) || adreno_is_7c3(gpu);
Fixes: 1b90e8f887 ("drm/msm/adreno: change adreno_is_* functions to accept const argument")
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/542138/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230612182527.3345786-1-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org
The commit 010c8bbad2 ("drm: msm: adreno: Disable preemption on Adreno
510") tried to check GPU's revn before revn being set. Add WARN_ON_ONCE
to prevent such bugs from happening again. A separate helper is
necessary so that the warning is displayed really just once instead of
being displayed for each of comparisons.
Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/531705/
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
