For CCS formats on affected platforms, CCS can be used freely, but
display engine requires a multiple of 64k physical pages. No other
changes are needed.
At the BO creation time we don't know if the BO will be used for CCS
or not. If the scanout flag is set, and the BO is a multiple of 64k,
we take the safe route and force the physical alignment of 64k pages.
If the BO is not a multiple of 64k, or the scanout flag was not set
at BO creation, we reject it for usage as CCS in display. The physical
pages are likely not aligned correctly, and this will cause corruption
when used as FB.
The scanout flag and size being a multiple of 64k are used together
to enforce 64k physical placement.
VM_BIND is completely unaffected, mappings to a VM can still be aligned
to 4k, just like for normal buffers.
Signed-off-by: Zbigniew Kempczyński <zbigniew.kempczynski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkilä <juha-pekka.heikkila@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240826170117.327709-3-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
The flags stored in the BO grew over time without following
much a naming pattern. First of all, get rid of the _BIT suffix that was
banned from everywhere else due to the guideline in
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h that xe kind of follows:
Define bits using ``REG_BIT(N)``. Do **not** add ``_BIT`` suffix to the name.
Here the flags aren't for a register, but it's good practice to keep it
consistent.
Second divergence on names is the use or not of "CREATE". This is
because most of the flags are passed to xe_bo_create*() family of
functions, changing its behavior. However, since the flags are also
stored in the bo itself and checked elsewhere in the code, it seems
better to just omit the CREATE part.
With those 2 guidelines, all the flags are given the form
XE_BO_FLAG_<FLAG_NAME> with the following commands:
git grep -le "XE_BO_" -- drivers/gpu/drm/xe | xargs sed -i \
-e "s/XE_BO_\([_A-Z0-9]*\)_BIT/XE_BO_\1/g" \
-e 's/XE_BO_CREATE_/XE_BO_FLAG_/g'
git grep -le "XE_BO_" -- drivers/gpu/drm/xe | xargs sed -i -r \
-e 's/XE_BO_(DEFER_BACKING|SCANOUT|FIXED_PLACEMENT|PAGETABLE|NEEDS_CPU_ACCESS|NEEDS_UC|INTERNAL_TEST|INTERNAL_64K|GGTT_INVALIDATE)/XE_BO_FLAG_\1/g'
And then the defines in drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.h are adjusted to
follow the coding style.
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240322142702.186529-3-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
As for display, the intent is to share the display code with the i915
driver so that there is maximum reuse there.
We do this by recompiling i915/display code twice.
Now that i915 has been adapted to support the Xe build, we can add
the xe/display support.
This initial work is a collaboration of many people and unfortunately
this squashed patch won't fully honor the proper credits.
But let's try to add a few from the squashed patches:
Co-developed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
Co-developed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
