There are multiple failure cases a modeset-retry uevent can be sent for
a link (TBT tunnel BW allocation failure, unrecoverable link training
failure), a follow-up patch adding the handling for a new case where the
DP MST payload allocation fails. The uevent is the same in all cases,
sent to all the connectors on the link, so in case of multiple failures
there is no point in sending a separate uevent for each failure; prevent
this, sending only a single modeset-retry uevent for a commit.
Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240722165503.2084999-7-imre.deak@intel.com
Initialize the DP link parameters during HW readout. These need to be
up-to-date at least for the MST topology probing, which depends on the
link rate and lane count programmed in DPCD. A follow-up patch will
program the DPCD values to reflect the maximum link parameters before
the first MST topology probing, but should do so only if the link is
disabled (link_trained==false).
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240722165503.2084999-6-imre.deak@intel.com
In the
if (old_ddps != port->ddps || !created)
if (port->ddps && !port->input)
ret = drm_dp_send_enum_path_resources();
sequence the first if's condition is true if the port exists already
(!created) or the port was created anew (hence old_ddps==0) and it was
in the plugged state (port->ddps==1). The second if's condition is true
for output ports in the plugged state. So the function is called for an
output port in the plugged state, regardless if it already existed or
not and regardless of the old plugged state. In all other cases
port->full_pbn can be zeroed as the port is either an input for which
full_pbn is never set, or an output in the unplugged state for which
full_pbn was already zeroed previously or the port was just created
(with port->full_pbn==0).
Simplify the condition, making it clear that the path resources are
always enumerated for an output port in the plugged state.
Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240722165503.2084999-4-imre.deak@intel.com
Support "Pre-multiplied" and "None" blend mode on MediaTek's chips by
adding correct blend mode property when the planes init.
Before this patch, only the "Coverage" mode (default) is supported.
For more information, there are three pixel blend modes in DRM driver:
"None", "Pre-multiplied", and "Coverage".
To understand the difference between these modes, let's take a look at
the following two approaches to do alpha blending:
1. Straight:
dst.RGB = src.RGB * src.A + dst.RGB * (1 - src.A)
This is straightforward and easy to understand, when the source layer is
compositing with the destination layer, it's alpha will affect the
result. This is also known as "post-multiplied", or "Coverage" mode.
2. Pre-multiplied:
dst.RGB = src.RGB + dst.RGB * (1 - src.A)
Since the source RGB have already multiplied its alpha, only destination
RGB need to multiply it. This is the "Pre-multiplied" mode in DRM.
For the "None" blend mode in DRM, it means the pixel alpha is ignored
when compositing the layers, only the constant alpha for the composited
layer will take effects.
Reviewed-by: CK Hu <ck.hu@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Hsiao Chien Sung <shawn.sung@mediatek.com>
Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/dri-devel/patch/20240717-alpha-blending-v4-5-4b1c806c0749@mediatek.com/
Signed-off-by: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>
On the off chance that clock value ends up being too high (by means
of skl_ddi_calculate_wrpll() having been called with big enough
value of crtc_state->port_clock * 1000), one possible consequence
may be that the result will not be able to fit into signed int.
Fix this issue by moving conversion of clock parameter from kHz to Hz
into the body of skl_ddi_calculate_wrpll(), as well as casting the
same parameter to u64 type while calculating the value for AFE clock.
This both mitigates the overflow problem and avoids possible erroneous
integer promotion mishaps.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with static
analysis tool SVACE.
Fixes: 82d3543701 ("drm/i915/skl: Implementation of SKL DPLL programming")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Nikita Zhandarovich <n.zhandarovich@fintech.ru>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240729174035.25727-1-n.zhandarovich@fintech.ru
(cherry picked from commit 833cf12846)
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
On the off chance that clock value ends up being too high (by means
of skl_ddi_calculate_wrpll() having been called with big enough
value of crtc_state->port_clock * 1000), one possible consequence
may be that the result will not be able to fit into signed int.
Fix this issue by moving conversion of clock parameter from kHz to Hz
into the body of skl_ddi_calculate_wrpll(), as well as casting the
same parameter to u64 type while calculating the value for AFE clock.
This both mitigates the overflow problem and avoids possible erroneous
integer promotion mishaps.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with static
analysis tool SVACE.
Fixes: 82d3543701 ("drm/i915/skl: Implementation of SKL DPLL programming")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Nikita Zhandarovich <n.zhandarovich@fintech.ru>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240729174035.25727-1-n.zhandarovich@fintech.ru
The place for link training is in the encoder's atomic_enable
helper. Remove all related tests from other helper ASTDP functions;
especially ast_astdp_is_connected(), which tests HPD status.
DP link training is controlled by the firmware. A status flag reports
success or failure. The process can be fragile on Aspeed hardware. Moving
the test from connector detection to the atomic_enable allows for several
retries and a longer timeout.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Jocelyn Falempe <jfalempe@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240717143319.104012-5-tzimmermann@suse.de
Now that rtp has OR rules, it's not needed to extend it to process OOB
WAs. Previously if an entry had no name, it was considered as "a set of
rules OR'ed with the last named entry".
Instead of generating new entries, add OR rules. The syntax for
xe_wa_oob.rules remains the same, with xe_gen_wa_oob generating the
slightly different table. Object sizes delta are negligible, but having
just one logic makes it easier to maintain:
add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 1/2 up/down: 160/-269 (-109)
Function old new delta
__compound_literal 6104 6264 +160
xe_wa_dump 1839 1810 -29
oob_was 816 576 -240
Total: Before=17257, After=17148, chg -0.63%
Reviewed-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240727015907.899192-9-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Like commit 512660cd1f ("drm/xe/rtp: Expand max rules/actions per
entry") did, expand the maximum number of actions/rules. That commit was
too conservative, just incrementing 2. Other than the ugliness of these
macros and additional preprocessor steps when they are used, there are
no downsides on increasing the maximum: the tables in which they are
used use a sentinel to mark the last element.
With rtp processing now supporting OR rules, it's possible to migrate
the extension made for OOB WAs that "entries with name are OR'ed in
previous entry". For that the maximum number of rules needs to be
increased.
Just double it. Hopefully 12 is sufficient for longer than 6 was.
Reviewed-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240727015907.899192-8-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
The OOB WAs use xe_rtp_process(), without passing an sr to save result
of the actions since there are none. They are also executed in a gt-only
context, making it harder to share the implementation. Thus, introduce a
new set of tests to check these RTP entries. The only check that can be
done is if the entry was marked as active.
Before commit fd6797ec50 ("drm/xe/rtp: Fix off-by-one when processing
rules") several of these tests were failing: the processing of OR'ed
entries would make the subsequent entry to be inadvertently enabled.
Reviewed-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240727015907.899192-6-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Although all current Xe2 platforms support FlatCCS, we probably
shouldn't assume that will be universally true forever. In the past
we've had platforms like PVC that didn't support compression, and the
same could show up again at some point in the future. Future-proof the
migration code by adding an explicit check for FlatCCS support to the
condition that decides whether to use a compressed PAT index for
migration.
While we're at it, we can drop the IS_DGFX check since it's redundant
with the src_is_vram check (only dGPUs have VRAM).
Cc: Akshata Jahagirdar <akshata.jahagirdar@intel.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Akshata Jahagirdar <akshata.jahagirdar@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240726171757.2728819-2-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
We only had a couple of array[] declarations, and changing them to just
use 'MAX()' instead of 'max()' fixes the issue.
This will allow us to simplify our min/max macros enormously, since they
can now unconditionally use temporary variables to avoid using the
argument values multiple times.
Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This just standardizes the use of MIN() and MAX() macros, with the very
traditional semantics. The goal is to use these for C constant
expressions and for top-level / static initializers, and so be able to
simplify the min()/max() macros.
These macro names were used by various kernel code - they are very
traditional, after all - and all such users have been fixed up, with a
few different approaches:
- trivial duplicated macro definitions have been removed
Note that 'trivial' here means that it's obviously kernel code that
already included all the major kernel headers, and thus gets the new
generic MIN/MAX macros automatically.
- non-trivial duplicated macro definitions are guarded with #ifndef
This is the "yes, they define their own versions, but no, the include
situation is not entirely obvious, and maybe they don't get the
generic version automatically" case.
- strange use case #1
A couple of drivers decided that the way they want to describe their
versioning is with
#define MAJ 1
#define MIN 2
#define DRV_VERSION __stringify(MAJ) "." __stringify(MIN)
which adds zero value and I just did my Alexander the Great
impersonation, and rewrote that pointless Gordian knot as
#define DRV_VERSION "1.2"
instead.
- strange use case #2
A couple of drivers thought that it's a good idea to have a random
'MIN' or 'MAX' define for a value or index into a table, rather than
the traditional macro that takes arguments.
These values were re-written as C enum's instead. The new
function-line macros only expand when followed by an open
parenthesis, and thus don't clash with enum use.
Happily, there weren't really all that many of these cases, and a lot of
users already had the pattern of using '#ifndef' guarding (or in one
case just using '#undef MIN') before defining their own private version
that does the same thing. I left such cases alone.
Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Commit 3a7e02c040 ("minmax: avoid overly complicated constant
expressions in VM code") added the simpler MIN_T/MAX_T macros in order
to avoid some excessive expansion from the rather complicated regular
min/max macros.
The complexity of those macros stems from two issues:
(a) trying to use them in situations that require a C constant
expression (in static initializers and for array sizes)
(b) the type sanity checking
and MIN_T/MAX_T avoids both of these issues.
Now, in the whole (long) discussion about all this, it was pointed out
that the whole type sanity checking is entirely unnecessary for
min_t/max_t which get a fixed type that the comparison is done in.
But that still leaves min_t/max_t unnecessarily complicated due to
worries about the C constant expression case.
However, it turns out that there really aren't very many cases that use
min_t/max_t for this, and we can just force-convert those.
This does exactly that.
Which in turn will then allow for much simpler implementations of
min_t()/max_t(). All the usual "macros in all upper case will evaluate
the arguments multiple times" rules apply.
We should do all the same things for the regular min/max() vs MIN/MAX()
cases, but that has the added complexity of various drivers defining
their own local versions of MIN/MAX, so that needs another level of
fixes first.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/b47fad1d0cf8449886ad148f8c013dae@AcuMS.aculab.com/
Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
