[background] when unloading amdgpu driver right after running a
workload, drain_workqueue is causing "Fence fallback timer
expired on ring sdma0.0". Under sriov, this issue will cause sriov
full access timeout and a reset happening.
move drain_workqueue before shutdown is set to allow ih process and
before enter full access under sriov to avoid full access time cost.
Signed-off-by: Victor Zhao <Victor.Zhao@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Feifei Xu <Feifei.Xu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Do the coredump immediately after a job timeout to get a closer
representation of GPU's error status.
V2: This will skip printing vram_lost as the GPU reset is not
happened yet (Alex)
V3: Unconditionally call the core dump as we care about all the reset
functions(soft-recovery and queue reset and full adapter reset, Alex)
V4: Do the dump after adev->job_hang = true (Sunil)
Signed-off-by: Trigger Huang <Trigger.Huang@amd.com>
Acked-by: Sunil Khatri <sunil.khatri@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
The vm lost status can only be obtained after a GPU reset occurs, but
sometimes a dev core dump can be happened before GPU reset. So a new
argument is added to tell the dev core dump implementation whether to
skip printing the vram_lost status in the dump.
And this patch is also trying to decouple the core dump function from
the GPU reset function, by replacing the argument amdgpu_reset_context
with amdgpu_job to specify the context for core dump.
V2: Inform user if VRAM lost check is skipped so users don't assume
VRAM wasn't lost (Alex)
Signed-off-by: Trigger Huang <Trigger.Huang@amd.com>
Suggested-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Add this flag to enable experimental resets for testing before they
are fully validated.
Reviewed-and-tested-by: Jiadong Zhu <Jiadong.Zhu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[why]
It is to fix in try_disable_dsc() due to misrevert of
commit 338567d176 ("drm/amd/display: Fix MST BW calculation Regression")
[How]
Fix restoring minimum compression bw by 'max_kbps', instead of native bw 'stream_kbps'
Signed-off-by: Fangzhi Zuo <Jerry.Zuo@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
In mtk_crtc_ddp_config(), mtk_crtc will use some configuration flags to
generate instructions to cmdq_handle, such as:
state->pending_config
mtk_crtc->pending_planes
plane_state->pending.config
mtk_crtc->pending_async_planes
plane_state->pending.async_config
These configuration flags may be set to false when a GCE IRQ comes calling
ddp_cmdq_cb(). This may result in missing prepare instructions,
especially if mtk_crtc_update_config() with the flase need_vblank (no need
to wait for vblank) cases.
Therefore, the mtk_crtc->config_updating flag is set at the beginning of
mtk_crtc_update_config() to ensure that these configuration flags won't be
changed when the mtk_crtc_ddp_config() is preparing instructions.
But somehow the ddp_cmdq_cb() didn't use the mtk_crtc->config_updating
flag to prevent those pending config flags from being cleared.
To avoid missing the configuration when generating the config instruction,
the config_updating flag should be added into ddp_cmdq_cb() and be
protected with spin_lock.
Fixes: 7f82d9c438 ("drm/mediatek: Clear pending flag when cmdq packet is done")
Signed-off-by: Jason-JH.Lin <jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: CK Hu <ck.hu@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: Fei Shao <fshao@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/dri-devel/patch/20240827-drm-fixup-0819-v3-1-4761005211ec@mediatek.com/
Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/dri-devel/patch/20240827-drm-fixup-0819-v3-2-4761005211ec@mediatek.com/
Signed-off-by: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>
Adding the per-frame lp function of mt8188, which can keep HFP in HS and
reduce the time required for each line to enter and exit low power.
Per Frame LP:
|<----------One Active Frame-------->|
--______________________________________----___________________
^HSA+HBP^^RGB^^HFP^^HSA+HBP^^RGB^^HFP^ ^HSA+HBP^^RGB^^HFP^
Per Line LP:
|<---------------One Active Frame----------->|
--______________--______________--______________----______________
^HSA+HBP^^RGB^ ^HSA+HBP^^RGB^ ^HSA+HBP^^RGB^ ^HSA+HBP^^RGB^
Signed-off-by: Shuijing Li <shuijing.li@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: CK Hu <ck.hu@mediatek.com>
Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/dri-devel/patch/20240826060654.24038-1-shuijing.li@mediatek.com/
Signed-off-by: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>
of_property_read_u32() returns -EINVAL if a property is not present, so
the preceding check for presence with of_find_property() can be
dropped. Really, what the errno is shouldn't matter. Either the property
can be read and used or it can't and is ignored.
This is part of a larger effort to remove callers of of_find_property()
and similar functions. of_find_property() leaks the DT struct property
and data pointers which is a problem for dynamically allocated nodes
which may be freed.
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: CK Hu <ck.hu@mediatek.com>
Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/dri-devel/patch/20240731201407.1838385-1-robh@kernel.org/
Signed-off-by: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>
MediaTek SoCs support multiple planes, one of which is the primary
and all the others are overlays (and CURSOR is the last overlay).
In all currently supported SoCs, the Z order of the overlays can't
be changed with any fast muxing action, and can only be changed by
swapping the contents of the entire register set of one overlay
with the other to internally reorder the layer properties, which
is indeed feasible, but probably more expensive than desired.
Declare the Z position for all planes with an immutable property
at least for now, so that the userspace can take its decisions
accordingly.
Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Fei Shao <fshao@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: CK Hu <ck.hu@mediatek.com>
Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/dri-devel/patch/20240718082507.216764-1-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com/
Signed-off-by: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>
In order to avoid the DSB keeping the DEwake permanently
asserted we must clear DSB_PMCTRL_2.DSB_FORCE_DEWAKE once
we are done. For good measure do the same for
DSB_PMCTRL.DSB_ENABLE_DEWAKE.
Experimentally this doens't seem to be actually necessary
(unlike with DSB_FORCE_DEWAKE). That is, the DSB_ENABLE_DEWAKE
doesn't seem to do anything whenever the DSB is not active.
But I'd hate to waste a ton of power in case there I'm wrong
and there is some way DEwake could remaing asserted. One extra
register write is a small price to pay for some peace of mind.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240624191032.27333-13-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Allow intel_dsb_chain() to start the chained DSB
at start of the undelaye vblank. This is slightly
more involved than simply setting the bit as we
must use the DEwake mechanism to eliminate pkgC
latency.
And DSB_ENABLE_DEWAKE itself is problematic in that
it allows us to configure just a single scanline,
and if the current scanline is already past that
DSB_ENABLE_DEWAKE won't do anything, rendering the
whole thing moot.
The current workaround involves checking the pipe's current
scanline with the CPU, and if it looks like we're about to
miss the configured DEwake scanline we set DSB_FORCE_DEWAKE
to immediately assert DEwake. This is somewhat racy since the
hardware is making progress all the while we're checking it on
the CPU.
We can make things less racy by chaining two DSBs and handling
the DSB_FORCE_DEWAKE stuff entirely without CPU involvement:
1. CPU starts the first DSB immediately
2. First DSB configures the second DSB, including its dewake_scanline
3. First DSB starts the second w/ DSB_WAIT_FOR_VBLANK
4. First DSB asserts DSB_FORCE_DEWAKE
5. First DSB waits until we're outside the dewake_scanline-vblank_start
window
6. First DSB deasserts DSB_FORCE_DEWAKE
That will guarantee that the we are fully awake when the second
DSB starts to actually execute.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240624191032.27333-12-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Add functions to emit a DSB scanline window wait instructions.
We can either wait for the scanline to be IN the window
or OUT of the window.
The hardware doesn't handle wraparound so we must manually
deal with it by swapping the IN range to the inverse OUT
range, or vice versa.
Also add a bit of paranoia to catch the edge case of waiting
for the entire frame. That doesn't make sense since an IN
wait would be a nop, and an OUT wait would imply waiting
forever. Most of the time this also results in both scanline
ranges (original and inverted) to have lower=upper+1
which is nonsense from the hw POV.
For now we are only handling the case where the scanline wait
happens prior to latching the double buffered registers during
the commit (which might change the timings due to LRR/VRR/etc.)
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240624191032.27333-10-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
When determining various scanlines for DSB use we should take into
account whether VRR is active at the time when the DSB uses said
scanline information. For now all DSB scanline usage occurs prior
to the actual commit, so we only need to care about the state of
VRR at that time.
I've decided to move intel_crtc_scanline_to_hw() in its entirety
to the DSB code as it will also need to know the actual state
of VRR in order to do its job 100% correctly.
TODO: figure out how much of this could be moved to some
more generic place and perhaps be shared with the CPU
vblank evasion code/etc...
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240624191032.27333-8-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Currently we calculate the DEwake scanline based on
the delayed vblank start, while in reality it should be computed
based on the undelayed vblank start (as that is where the DSB
actually starts). Currently it doesn't really matter as we
don't have any vblank delay configured, but that may change
in the future so let's be accurate in what we do.
We can also remove the max() as intel_crtc_scanline_to_hw()
can deal with negative numbers, which there really shouldn't
be anyway.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240624191032.27333-7-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Currently we switch from out software idea of a scanline
to the hw's idea of a scanline during the commit phase in
_intel_dsb_commit(). While that is slightly easier due to
fastsets fiddling with the timings, we'll also need to
generate proper hw scanline numbers already when emitting
DSB scanline wait instructions. So this approach won't
do in the future. Switch to hw scanline numbers earlier.
Also intel_dsb_dewake_scanline() itself already makes
some assumptions about VRR that don't take into account
VRR toggling during fastsets, so technically delaying
the sw->hw conversion doesn't even help us.
The other reason for delaying the conversion was that we
are using intel_get_crtc_scanline() during intel_dsb_commit()
which gives us the current sw scanline. But this is pretty
low level stuff anyway so just using raw PIPEDSL reads seems
fine here, and that of course gives us the hw scanline
directly, reducing the need to do so many conversions.
v2: Return the non-hw scanline from intel_dsb_dewake_scanline()
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240624191032.27333-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
On ilk/snb the pipe may be configured to place the LUT before or
after the CSC depending on various factors, but as there is only
one LUT (no split mode like on IVB+) we only advertise a gamma_lut
and no degamma_lut in the uapi to avoid confusing userspace.
This can cause a problem during readout if the VBIOS/GOP enabled
the LUT in the pre CSC configuration. The current code blindly
assigns the results of the readout to the degamma_lut, which will
cause a failure during the next atomic_check() as we aren't expecting
anything to be in degamma_lut since it's not visible to userspace.
Fix the problem by assigning whatever LUT we read out from the
hardware into gamma_lut.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: d2559299d3 ("drm/i915: Make ilk_read_luts() capable of degamma readout")
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/i915/kernel/-/issues/11608
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240710124137.16773-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
A NULL dev->dma_parms indicates either a bus that is not DMA capable or
grave bug in the implementation of the bus code.
There isn't much the driver can do in terms of error handling for either
case, so just warn and continue as DMA operations will fail anyway.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> # For MMC
The function parameter out can be used directly instead of assigning it
to a temporary u64 variable first.
Remove the local variable tmp2 and use the parameter out directly as the
divisor in do_div() to remove the following Coccinelle/coccicheck
warning reported by do_div.cocci:
WARNING: do_div() does a 64-by-32 division, please consider using div64_u64 instead
Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@toblux.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240710210034.796032-2-thorsten.blum@toblux.com
