Add functions to simply print some basic state information in selftests.
The output can be enabled by setting:
#define TH_LOG_ENABLED 1
#define DEBUG 1
* print_psw: current SIE state description and VM run state
* print_hex_bytes: print memory with some counting markers
* print_hex: PRINT_HEX with 512 bytes
* print_run: use print_psw and print_hex to print contents of VM run
state and SIE state description
* print_regs: print content of general and control registers
All prints use pr_debug for the output and can be configured using
DEBUG.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Schlameuss <schlameuss@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240807154512.316936-6-schlameuss@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <20240807154512.316936-6-schlameuss@linux.ibm.com>
Subsequent tests do require direct manipulation of the SIE control
block. This commit introduces the SIE control block definition for use
within the selftests.
There are already definitions of this within the kernel.
This differs in two ways.
* This is the first definition of this in userspace.
* In the context of the selftests this does not require atomicity for
the flags.
With the userspace definition of the SIE block layout now being present
we can reuse the values in other tests where applicable.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Schlameuss <schlameuss@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240807154512.316936-3-schlameuss@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <20240807154512.316936-3-schlameuss@linux.ibm.com>
Effectively revert the movement of code from kvm_util.h => kvm_util_base.h,
as the TL;DR of the justification for the move was to avoid #idefs and/or
circular dependencies between what ended up being ucall_common.h and what
was (and now again, is), kvm_util.h.
But avoiding #ifdef and circular includes is trivial: don't do that. The
cost of removing kvm_util_base.h is a few extra includes of ucall_common.h,
but that cost is practically nothing. On the other hand, having a "base"
version of a header that is really just the header itself is confusing,
and makes it weird/hard to choose names for headers that actually are
"base" headers, e.g. to hold core KVM selftests typedefs.
For all intents and purposes, this reverts commit
7d9a662ed9.
Reviewed-by: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240314232637.2538648-2-seanjc@google.com
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Add an architecture specific ucall.h and inline the simple arch hooks,
e.g. the init hook for everything except ARM, and the actual "do ucall"
hook for everything except x86 (which should be simple, but temporarily
isn't due to carrying a workaround).
Having a per-arch ucall header will allow adding a #define for the
expected KVM exit reason for a ucall that is colocated (for everything
except x86) with the ucall itself.
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230731203026.1192091-2-seanjc@google.com
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
The DIAGNOSE 0x0318 instruction, unique to s390x, is a privileged call
that must be intercepted via SIE, handled in userspace, and the
information set by the instruction is communicated back to KVM.
To test the instruction interception, an ad-hoc handler is defined which
simply has a VM execute the instruction and then userspace will extract
the necessary info. The handler is defined such that the instruction
invocation occurs only once. It is up to the caller to determine how the
info returned by this handler should be used.
The diag318 info is communicated from userspace to KVM via a sync_regs
call. This is tested during a sync_regs test, where the diag318 info is
requested via the handler, then the info is stored in the appropriate
register in KVM via a sync registers call.
If KVM does not support diag318, then the tests will print a message
stating that diag318 was skipped, and the asserts will simply test
against a value of 0.
Signed-off-by: Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201207154125.10322-1-walling@linux.ibm.com
Acked-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
