When using FPO, there is some misconfiguration that happens for the lack
of configuration of the MCLK switch in some circumstances. This commit
adds the required field update when using the MCLK switch.
Reviewed-by: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
All clock values came from firmware, but bounding box values can be
helpful in some debug situations. This commit updates some of the values
associated with clock speed and memory channels.
Reviewed-by: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Description]
- When determining FPO support, include FPO + VActive support
- Support FPO + VActive if one display meets regular requirements
for FPO and the second display is able to switch in VACTIVE with
a given amount of margin
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Qingqing Zhuo <qingqing.zhuo@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alvin Lee <Alvin.Lee2@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
In 2560x1600@240p eDP panel, driver use lowest voltage level
to play 1080p video cause underflow. According to HW SPEC,
the senario should use high voltage level.
[How]
ChromaPre value is zero when bandwidth validation.
Correct ChromaPre calculation.
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <Nicholas.Kazlauskas@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Qingqing Zhuo <qingqing.zhuo@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Hsieh <Paul.Hsieh@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Description]
- If we find that applying FAMS doesn't reduce the voltage level,
we will not use it
- Ensure to clear the stream flags indicating FAMS if we hit this
case
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Qingqing Zhuo <qingqing.zhuo@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alvin Lee <Alvin.Lee2@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Description]
* Pass in pipe index for FPO cmd to DMCUB
- This change will pass in the pipe index for each stream
that is using FPO
- This change is in preparation to enable FPO + VActive
* Use per pipe P-State force for FPO
- For FPO, instead of using max watermarks value for P-State disallow,
use per pipe p-state force instead
- This is in preparation to enable FPO + VActive
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Qingqing Zhuo <qingqing.zhuo@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alvin Lee <Alvin.Lee2@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Description]
- On high refresh rate DRR displays that support VBLANK naturally,
UCLK could be idling at DPM1 instead of DPM0 since it doesn't use
FPO
- To achieve DPM0, enable FPO on these configs even though it can
support P-State without FPO
- Default disable for now, have debug option to enable
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Qingqing Zhuo <qingqing.zhuo@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alvin Lee <Alvin.Lee2@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why & How]
All dc subcomponents should call another dc component via function pointers
stored in a component structure. This is part of dc coding convention since
the beginning. The reason behind this is to improve encapsulation and
polymorphism. The function contract is extracted into a single link service
structure defined in link.h header file and implemented only in link_factory.c instead
of spreading across multiple files in link component file structure.
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Qingqing Zhuo <qingqing.zhuo@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenjing Liu <wenjing.liu@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[why]
Remove the need to include dc_link.h separately. dc.h should contain
everything needed on DM side.
[How]
Merge dc_link.h into dc.h and dc_types.h so DM only needs to include
dc.h to use all link public functions.
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Qingqing Zhuo <qingqing.zhuo@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenjing Liu <wenjing.liu@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why&How]
Temporarily disable SubVP+DRR since Xorg has an architectural limitation
where freesync will not work in a multi monitor configuration. SubVP+DRR
requires that freesync be working.
Whether OS has variable refresh setting enabled or not, the state on
the crtc remains same unless an application requests VRR. Due to this,
there is no way to know whether freesync will actually work or not
while we are on the desktop from the kernel's perspective.
If userspace does not have a limitation with multi-display freesync (for
example wayland), then this feature can be enabled by adding a
dcfeaturemask option to amdgpu on the kernel cmdline like:
amdgpu.dcfeaturemask=0x200
Signed-off-by: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Remove duplicate or repeating expressions in the if condition
evaluation. Issue identified using doubletest.cocci Coccinelle semantic
patch.
Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <drv@mailo.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why & How]
- For prefetch max vratio check, use the calculated
prefetch bandwidth from dml32_CalculatePrefetchSchedule
instead of max prefetch bandwidth
- Also multiply prefetch bandwidth by VRatio since scaling
is not considered one calculating require prefetch bw
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Qingqing Zhuo <qingqing.zhuo@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alvin Lee <Alvin.Lee2@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Description]
- Single 4K60 playing YUV420 MPO video blocks P-State because
the required VRatio for prefetch is too high (luma plane for
YUV420 is 1bpe, so swath height is 16 and prefetch requires
more lines)
- Allow max vratio per plane to be 7.9 for single display YUV420
MPO video cases
- Ensure that global vratio prefetch (i.e. total prefetch BW vs.
total active bandwidth) does not excited 4.0
Reviewed-by: Nevenko Stupar <Nevenko.Stupar@amd.com>
Acked-by: Qingqing Zhuo <qingqing.zhuo@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alvin Lee <Alvin.Lee2@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
cppcheck reports
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/dcn32/dcn32_fpu.c:1403:76: style:
Expression is always true because 'else if' condition is opposite to previous condition at line 1396. [multiCondition]
} else if (context->res_ctx.pipe_ctx[i].stream->mall_stream_config.type == SUBVP_PHANTOM) {
^
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/dcn32/dcn32_fpu.c:1396:69: note: first condition
if (context->res_ctx.pipe_ctx[i].stream->mall_stream_config.type != SUBVP_PHANTOM) {
^
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/dcn32/dcn32_fpu.c:1403:76: note: else if condition is opposite to first condition
} else if (context->res_ctx.pipe_ctx[i].stream->mall_stream_config.type == SUBVP_PHANTOM) {
It is not necessary to explicitly the check != condition, an else is simplier.
Fixes: 238debcaeb ("drm/amd/display: Use DML for MALL SS and Subvp allocation calculations")
Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
Currently we set FCLK p-state change
watermark calculated based on dummy
p-state latency when UCLK p-state is
not supported
[How]
Calculate FCLK p-state change watermark
based on on FCLK pstate change latency
in case UCLK p-state is not supported
Reviewed-by: Nevenko Stupar <Nevenko.Stupar@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alex Hung <alex.hung@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Stempen <vladimir.stempen@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[why]
Temporarly merge dc_link_dp functions into dc_link for the
purpose of removing dc_link_dp files. This is a transitional
change for later commits where we will further refactor dc_link
file.
Reviewed-by: George Shen <George.Shen@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alan Liu <HaoPing.Liu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenjing Liu <wenjing.liu@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
MALL size available can vary for different SKUs.
Use num_chans read from VBIOS to determine the available MALL size we can use
[How]
Define max_chans for DCN32 and DCN321.
If num_chans is max_chans, then return max_chans as we can access the
entire MALL space.
Otherwise, define avail_chans as the number of available channels we are
allowed instead.
Return corresponding number of channels back and use this to calculate
available MALL size.
Reviewed-by: Nevenko Stupar <Nevenko.Stupar@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alan Liu <HaoPing.Liu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Samson Tam <Samson.Tam@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Description]
- We cannot enable subvp on PSR panels because when
PSR is active, HUBP is turned off and we cannot rely
on the HUBP vline interrupt
- When in PSR, surface data also cannot be prefetched to MALL
because the main HUBP will be off
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Nevenko Stupar <Nevenko.Stupar@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alan Liu <HaoPing.Liu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alvin Lee <Alvin.Lee2@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[WHY and HOW]
When fast validating, we should be agnostic to any sort of optimizations
such as supporting Pstate or stutter in Vblank. We should change our
prefetch mode for fast validate to support none of these optimizations.
For example, Valve Index running at 144Hz can only be validated without
any support these optimizations.
Reviewed-by: Alvin Lee <Alvin.Lee2@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alan Liu <HaoPing.Liu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Saaem Rizvi <SyedSaaem.Rizvi@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
Iterating over every voltage state when we need to validate thousands of
configurations all at once (i.e. display hotplug) can take a significant
amount of time.
[How]
Check just the highest voltage state when fast_validate is true to
verify whether the configuration can work at all, then do a proper
validation including all voltage states later when fast_validate is false.
Reviewed-by: Nevenko Stupar <Nevenko.Stupar@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alan Liu <HaoPing.Liu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Bakoulin <Ilya.Bakoulin@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Dillon Varone <Dillon.Varone@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[WHY?]
Cannot only consider the MALL required from top pipes because of the MPO
case.
[HOW?]
Only count a pipe if it fits the following criteria:
1) does not have a top pipe (is the topmost pipe for that plane)
2) it does have a top pipe, but that pipe is associated with a different
plane
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <Daniel.Wheeler@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Nevenko Stupar <Nevenko.Stupar@amd.com>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Dillon Varone <Dillon.Varone@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
DCC meta was found to be detached from usable pixel data. Due to this
DCC meta and the end of the fetched part of the frame will be on not
be on the same mblk. Furthermore if the meta is not aligned to the mblk
size, then we require an extra mblk in MALL to account for this.
[How]
Always add an additional mblk when DCC is enabled for detachment and
misalignment.
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <Daniel.Wheeler@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Dillon Varone <Dillon.Varone@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Saaem Rizvi <SyedSaaem.Rizvi@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
MALL SS and Subvp use the same calculations for determining the size of
the required allocation for a given surface, which is already done in
DML. Add an interface to extract this information from VBA variables and
use in their respective helper functions. Also refactor existing code to
remove stale workarounds.
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <Daniel.Wheeler@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alvin Lee <Alvin.Lee2@amd.com>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Dillon Varone <Dillon.Varone@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Two issues existed:
1) Configs that support DRR, but have it disabled will fail subvp+vblank
validation incorrectly. Use subvp+vblank path for this case.
2) Configs that support DRR and have it enabled can use higher voltage level
than required if they also support subvp+vblank. Use lowest supported voltage
level for this case.
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <Daniel.Wheeler@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alvin Lee <Alvin.Lee2@amd.com>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Dillon Varone <Dillon.Varone@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
SwathSizePerSurfaceY[] and SwathSizePerSurfaceC[] values are uninitialized
because we are using += instead of = operator.
[How]
Assign values in loop with = operator.
Acked-by: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Samson Tam <samson.tam@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Aric Cyr <aric.cyr@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[WHY]
Subvp portion validation currently assumes that if vlevel provided does not
support pstate, then none will, and so subvp is not used.
[HOW]
After get vlevel, use lowest vlevel that supports pstate if it
exists, and use that for subvp validation.
Reviewed-by: Alvin Lee <Alvin.Lee2@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Jasdeep Dhillon <jdhillon@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Dillon Varone <Dillon.Varone@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Description]
- When merging a pipe that was previously pipe split, we need
to also clear the link resources or the next stream/plane that
uses the pipe may have an incorrect link resource state
Reviewed-by: Wenjing Liu <Wenjing.Liu@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Nevenko Stupar <Nevenko.Stupar@amd.com>
Acked-by: Jasdeep Dhillon <jdhillon@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alvin Lee <Alvin.Lee2@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Description]
- FW scheduling algorithm doesn't take into account of it's
a center timing
- This affects where the subvp mclk switch can be scheduled
(prevents HUBP vline interrupt from coming in if scheduled
incorrectly)
- Block subvp center timing cases for now
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Jasdeep Dhillon <jdhillon@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alvin Lee <Alvin.Lee2@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
Iterating over every voltage state when we need to validate thousands of
configurations all at once (i.e. display hotplug) can take a significant
amount of time.
[How]
Check just the highest voltage state when fast_validate is true to
verify whether the configuration can work at all, then do a proper
validation including all voltage states later when fast_validate is false.
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Jasdeep Dhillon <jdhillon@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Bakoulin <Ilya.Bakoulin@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Description]
- This is a workaround to avoid concurrency issues -- a fast update
creates a shallow copy of the dc current_state, and removes all
subvp/phantom related flags.
- We want to prevent the fast update thread from removing those
flags in case there's another thread running that requires
the info for proper programming
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Jasdeep Dhillon <jdhillon@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alvin Lee <Alvin.Lee2@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
The 'commit 52e4fdf09ebc ("drm/amd/display: use low clocks for no plane
configs")' introduced a change that set low clock values for DCN31 and
DCN32. As a result of these changes, DC started to spam the log with the
following warning:
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 8 PID: 1486 at
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn20/dcn20_dccg.c:58
dccg2_update_dpp_dto+0x3f/0xf0 [amdgpu]
[..]
CPU: 8 PID: 1486 Comm: kms_atomic Tainted: G W 5.18.0+ #1
RIP: 0010:dccg2_update_dpp_dto+0x3f/0xf0 [amdgpu]
RSP: 0018:ffffbbd8025334d0 EFLAGS: 00010206
RAX: 00000000000001ee RBX: ffffa02c87dd3de0 RCX: 00000000000a7f80
RDX: 000000000007dec3 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffffa02c87dd3de0
RBP: ffffbbd8025334e8 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000005
R10: 00000000000331a0 R11: ffffffffc0b03d80 R12: ffffa02ca576d000
R13: ffffa02cd02c0000 R14: 00000000001453bc R15: ffffa02cdc280000
[..]
dcn20_update_clocks_update_dpp_dto+0x4e/0xa0 [amdgpu]
dcn32_update_clocks+0x5d9/0x650 [amdgpu]
dcn20_prepare_bandwidth+0x49/0x100 [amdgpu]
dcn30_prepare_bandwidth+0x63/0x80 [amdgpu]
dc_commit_state_no_check+0x39d/0x13e0 [amdgpu]
dc_commit_streams+0x1f9/0x3b0 [amdgpu]
dc_commit_state+0x37/0x120 [amdgpu]
amdgpu_dm_atomic_commit_tail+0x5e5/0x2520 [amdgpu]
? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x1f/0x40
? down_trylock+0x2c/0x40
? vprintk_emit+0x186/0x2c0
? vprintk_default+0x1d/0x20
? vprintk+0x4e/0x60
We can easily trigger this issue by using a 4k@120 or a 2k@165 and
running some of the kms_atomic tests. This warning is triggered because
the per-pipe clock update is not happening; this commit fixes this issue
by ensuring that DPPCLK is updated when calculating the watermark and
dlg is invoked.
Fixes: 2641c7b780 ("drm/amd/display: use low clocks for no plane configs")
Reported-by: Mark Broadworth <mark.broadworth@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmytro Laktyushkin <Dmytro.Laktyushkin@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[WHY?]
When calculating watermark and dlg values, the max mclk level index and
associated speed are needed to find the correlated dummy latency value.
Currently the incorrect index is given due to a clock manager refactor.
[HOW?]
Use num_memclk_level from num_entries_per_clk struct for getting the correct max
mem speed.
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Brian Chang <Brian.Chang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Dillon Varone <Dillon.Varone@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[WHY?]
Some configurations are constructed with very marginal DET buffers relative to
the worst possible time required to fetch a swath.
[HOW?]
Add a check to see that the DET buffer allocated for each pipe can hide the
latency for all pipes to fetch at least one swath.
Reviewed-by: Alvin Lee <Alvin.Lee2@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Brian Chang <Brian.Chang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Dillon Varone <Dillon.Varone@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[WHY?]
Prefetch is not budgetting time for dummy pstate when using subvp and low uclk.
[HOW?]
Override fclk change latency to use dummy pstate latency when calculating
prefetch schedule for subvp configs with low uclk.
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Brian Chang <Brian.Chang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Dillon Varone <Dillon.Varone@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
