[why]
There is a lack of encapsulation of pipe connection representation in pipe context.
This has caused many challenging bugs and coding errors with repeated
logic to identify the same pipe type.
[how]
Formally define pipe types and provide getters to identify a pipe type and
find a pipe based on specific requirements. Update existing logic in non dcn
specific files and dcn32 and future versions to use the new accessors.
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <jun.lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Stylon Wang <stylon.wang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenjing Liu <wenjing.liu@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[why]
Secondary DPP pipes are used for rendering secondary layers of planes.
The name "for layer" doesn't make it obvious. The function is acquiring
a free pipe as secondary dpp pipe only. We rename it so it is more obvious.
In a future follow up change, we want to add functions to acquire free pipe as
opp head pipe or otg master pipe as well. They will have their separate
allocation priority.
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <jun.lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Tom Chung <chiahsuan.chung@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenjing Liu <wenjing.liu@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[why]
Preivous algorithm for finding an optimal idle pipe for a new plane was
implemented to handle dynamic pipe allocation when MPO plane moves
from one ODM slice to the other. Now pipe allocation is more static so
it no longer depends on the MPO plane's position. We are simplifying
our logic and remove unnecessary handling in our code.
[how]
Apply a new simplified version of pipe resource allocation logic to reduce
unnecessary flip delay caused by swapping secondary dpp pipe to other
MPC blending tree.
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <jun.lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Tom Chung <chiahsuan.chung@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenjing Liu <wenjing.liu@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Description]
- Refactor HW sequencer to use a build / execute sequence
- Also move gamma updates to become fast
v2: squash in build fix ("drm/amd/display: Fix guarding of 'if (dc->debug.visual_confirm)'")
Acked-by: Stylon Wang <stylon.wang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alvin Lee <alvin.lee2@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <jun.lei@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
The fields blends_with_above and blends_with_below of struct
dc_plane_cap (defined in dc/dc.h) are boolean and set to true by
default. All instances of a dc_plane_cap maintain the default values of
both. Also, there is only one if statement that checks those fields and
there would be the same effect if it was deleted (assuming that those
fields are always going to be true).
For this reason, considering both fields as legacy ones, this commit
removes them and the aforementioned if statement.
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: David Tadokoro <davidbtadokoro@usp.br>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
smatch reports these similar problems in dcn201
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/clk_mgr/dcn201/dcn201_clk_mgr.c:165:22:
warning: symbol 'dcn201_funcs' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn201/dcn201_resource.c:77:30:
warning: symbol 'dcn201_ip' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn201/dcn201_resource.c:139:37:
warning: symbol 'dcn201_soc' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn201/dcn201_mpc.c:79:24:
warning: symbol 'dcn201_mpc_funcs' was not declared. Should it be static?
All of these are only used in their definition file, so they should be static
Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why&How]
Preparation to enable run time initialization of register offsets to add
dc_context to the link_enc_create callback. This is needed to get the
dc_ctx handle where register offset initialization routine is called.
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alan Liu <HaoPing.Liu@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alex Hung <alex.hung@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
This turns previously global functions into static, thus removing
compile-time warnings such as:
warning: no previous prototype for 'get_highest_allowed_voltage_level'
[-Wmissing-prototypes]
742 | unsigned int get_highest_allowed_voltage_level(uint32_t chip_family, uint32_t hw_internal_rev, uint32_t pci_revision_id)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
warning: no previous prototype for 'rv1_vbios_smu_send_msg_with_param'
[-Wmissing-prototypes]
102 | int rv1_vbios_smu_send_msg_with_param(struct clk_mgr_internal *clk_mgr, unsigned int msg_id, unsigned int param)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Changes since v1:
- As suggested by Rodrigo Siqueira:
1. Rewrite function signatures to make them more readable.
2. Get rid of unused functions in order to remove 'defined but not
used' warnings.
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Isabella Basso <isabbasso@riseup.net>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
Current FPU code for DCN2x is located under dml/dcn2x.
This is not aligned with DC's general source tree
structure.
[How]
Move FPU code for DCN2x to dml/dcn20.
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Acked-by: Solomon Chiu <solomon.chiu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Qingqing Zhuo <qingqing.zhuo@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
