MALL SS and Subvp use the same calculations for determining the size of
the required allocation for a given surface, which is already done in
DML. Add an interface to extract this information from VBA variables and
use in their respective helper functions. Also refactor existing code to
remove stale workarounds.
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <Daniel.Wheeler@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alvin Lee <Alvin.Lee2@amd.com>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Dillon Varone <Dillon.Varone@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Two issues existed:
1) Configs that support DRR, but have it disabled will fail subvp+vblank
validation incorrectly. Use subvp+vblank path for this case.
2) Configs that support DRR and have it enabled can use higher voltage level
than required if they also support subvp+vblank. Use lowest supported voltage
level for this case.
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <Daniel.Wheeler@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alvin Lee <Alvin.Lee2@amd.com>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Dillon Varone <Dillon.Varone@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
amd-drm-next-6.3-2023-01-13:
amdgpu:
- Fix possible segfault in failure case
- Rework FW requests to happen in early_init for all IPs so
that we don't lose the sbios console if FW is missing
- PSR fixes
- Misc cleanups
- Unload fix
- SMU13 fixes
amdkfd:
- Fix for cleared VRAM BOs
- Fix cleanup if GPUVM creation fails
- Memory accounting fix
- Use resource_size rather than open codeing it
- GC11 mGPU fix
radeon:
- Fix memory leak on shutdown
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
From: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230113225911.7776-1-alexander.deucher@amd.com
[why]
1. Move dd_link_ddc functions to link_ddc.
2. Move link ddc functions declaration exposed in dc to link.h
3. Move link ddc functions declaration exposed in dm to dc_link.h
4. Remove i2caux_interface.h file
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <Daniel.Wheeler@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenjing Liu <wenjing.liu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[WHY?]
FIFO enable sequence is incomplete as it is currently implemented in FW,
and requires reset to prevent the FIFO to be enabled in an invalid
state. This cannot be done until DIG FE is connected to the BE.
[HOW?]
Add FIFO enable sequence in driver for dcn32 with reset after DIG FE is
connected to BE.
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <Daniel.Wheeler@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alvin Lee <Alvin.Lee2@amd.com>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Dillon Varone <Dillon.Varone@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
The DPIA link encoder (DIG) was not released when a Display XDR 6K
monitor was disconnected. That's because the DPIA link encoder logic
checked the BW when it removed the link encoder for it. And the timing
BW was less than DP link BW. So, it failed to release the link encoder.
And that caused the DIG was occupied and can't be used. The reason it
checked the BW is it wants to identify whether this link was using DIG
or HPO. It skips if it's not DIG.
[How]
Not to check the BW when it removes the link encoder because it's
already in the assignment table, it must be the DIG.
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <Daniel.Wheeler@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Cruise Hung <Cruise.Hung@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
A previous fix attempted to correct mismatch between DM display
targets and dc panel instancing by only counting connected panels.
This behaviour breaks a feature, thus this is an alternative solution
that allows mapping display targets to dc links during mod_power_create.
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <Daniel.Wheeler@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <Nicholas.Kazlauskas@amd.com>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmytro Laktyushkin <Dmytro.Laktyushkin@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
A logical evaluation already results in bool. There is no need for using
a ternary operator based evaluation and bool conversion of the outcome.
Issue identified using boolconv.cocci Coccinelle semantic patch.
This was also reported by the Kernel Test Robot. Hence
Fixes: 473683a034 ("drm/amd/display: Create a file dedicated for CRTC")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <drv@mailo.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
On DCN314 when resuming from s0i3 an ASSERT is shown indicating that
`VBIOSSMC_MSG_SetHardMinDcfclkByFreq` returned `VBIOSSMC_Result_Failed`.
This isn't a driver bug; it's a BIOS/configuration bug. To make this
easier to triage, add an explicit warning when this issue happens.
This matches the behavior utilized for failures with
`VBIOSSMC_MSG_TransferTableDram2Smu` configuration.
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
Setting scaling does not correctly update CRTC state. As a result
dc stream state's src (composition area) && dest (addressable area)
was not calculated as expected. This causes set scaling doesn's work.
[How]
Correctly update CRTC state when setting scaling property.
Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Tested-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: hongao <hongao@uniontech.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
It is possible that adev->dm.dc->caps.max_links is greater than
AMDGPU_MAX_CRTCS. So, to not potentially access unallocated memory use
adev->mode_info.num_crtc to do the bounds check instead of
adev->dm.dc->caps.max_links.
Fixes: 1b11ff764a ("drm/amd/display: Implement multiple secure display")
Fixes: b8ff7e08ba ("drm/amd/display: Fix when disabling secure_display")
Reviewed-by: Alan Liu <HaoPing.Liu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Hamza Mahfooz <hamza.mahfooz@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
kfree() & vfree() internally performs NULL check on the pointer handed
to it and take no action if it indeed is NULL. Hence there is no need
for a pre-check of the memory pointer before handing it to
kfree()/vfree().
Issue reported by ifnullfree.cocci Coccinelle semantic patch script.
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <drv@mailo.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
The `amdgpu_ucode_request` helper will ensure that the return code for
missing firmware is -ENODEV so that early_init can fail.
The `amdgpu_ucode_release` helper is for symmetry on unloading.
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Lijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
If DMUB is required for an ASIC, ensure that the microcode is available
and validates during early_init.
Any failures will cause the driver to fail to probe before the firmware
framebuffer has been removed.
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Lijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Smatch report warning as follows:
Line 53679: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_stream.c:402
dc_stream_set_cursor_position() warn: variable dereferenced before
check 'stream'
The value of 'dc' has been assigned after check whether 'stream' is
NULL. Fix it by remove redundant assignment.
Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Yi Yang <yiyang13@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Currently, there are issues with enabling PSR-SU + DSC. This stems from
the fact that DSC imposes a slice height on transmitted video data and
we are not conforming to that slice height in PSR-SU regions. So, pass
slice_height into su_y_granularity to feed the DSC slice height into
PSR-SU code.
Acked-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Hamza Mahfooz <hamza.mahfooz@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
1. Rename securedisplay_cmd to ta_securedisplay_cmd.
2. Rename ta_securedisplay_max_phy to ta_securedisplay_phy_ID.
3. update securedisplay_cmd to ta_securedisplay_cmd
Signed-off-by: Aaron Liu <aaron.liu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Shane Xiao <shane.xiao@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alan Liu <HaoPing.Liu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
pipe_ctx pointer cannot be NULL when getting the address of
an element of the pipe_ctx array. Moreover, the MAX_PIPES is
defined as 6, so pipe_ctx is not NULL after the loop either.
Detected using the static analysis tool - Svace.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Kodanev <aleksei.kodanev@bell-sw.com>
Signed-off-by: Hamza Mahfooz <hamza.mahfooz@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Fix all kernel-doc warnings in dc/core/dc.c:
dc.c:385: warning: missing initial short description on line:
* dc_stream_adjust_vmin_vmax:
dc.c:392: warning: contents before sections
dc.c:399: warning: No description found for return value of 'dc_stream_adjust_vmin_vmax'
dc.c:434: warning: Excess function parameter 'adjust' description in 'dc_stream_get_last_used_drr_vtotal'
dc.c:434: warning: No description found for return value of 'dc_stream_get_last_used_drr_vtotal'
dc.c:574: warning: No description found for return value of 'dc_stream_configure_crc'
dc.c:1746: warning: No description found for return value of 'dc_commit_state_no_check'
dc.c:4991: warning: This comment starts with '/**', but isn't a kernel-doc comment. Refer Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst
* dc_extended_blank_supported 0 Decide whether extended blank is supported
dc.c:4991: warning: missing initial short description on line:
* dc_extended_blank_supported 0 Decide whether extended blank is supported
dc.c:4723: warning: Function parameter or member 'dc' not described in 'dc_enable_dmub_outbox'
dc.c:4926: warning: Function parameter or member 'dc' not described in 'dc_process_dmub_dpia_hpd_int_enable'
dc.c:4926: warning: Function parameter or member 'hpd_int_enable' not described in 'dc_process_dmub_dpia_hpd_int_enable'
12 warnings
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: Hamza Mahfooz <hamza.mahfooz@amd.com>
Cc: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Cc: Leo Li <sunpeng.li@amd.com>
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: "Pan, Xinhui" <Xinhui.Pan@amd.com>
Cc: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Signed-off-by: Hamza Mahfooz <hamza.mahfooz@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
We skip dsc_validation on pipes that are underlays, but in the
acquire_dsc code we don't have this check.
In certain conditions (when underlay pipe index is lower) we will assign
the dsc resource to the underlay pipe and skip the base pipe.
Now during dsc_validation we will skip the underlay pipe (this has the
dsc resource) but try to validate the base pipe(this doesn't have a dsc
resource) due to this mismatch we hit a NULLPTR
[How]
In the acquire_dsc add a check for underlay pipe so we
don't acquire a dsc resource for this pipe. This will match the
acquire/validation conditions.
Reviewed-by: Wenjing Liu <Wenjing.Liu@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Hersen Wu <Hersenxs.Wu@amd.com>
Acked-by: Praful Swarnakar <Praful.Swarnakar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Bhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[why & how]
By moving bw_ctx field to the end of the dc_state the state can be
cleared more efficiently without resulting in large DML memcpy
operations, resulting in better mode enumeration performance on some
platforms.
Acked-by: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Aric Cyr <aric.cyr@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Nevenko Stupar <Nevenko.Stupar@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why&How]
ignore_msa_timing_param is used by SubVP logic to determine if SubVP
+ DRR is possible. Linux does not support freesync on multi display
config, which results in incorrect assumption of VRR support if we
set this parameter when VRR is supported, but not enabled.
Signed-off-by: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <rodrigo.siqueira@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[why]
During DP2.1 LL CTS if test equipment requests to change between
DP2.1 and DP1.4 link rates, we need to swap between HPO and DIO
encoders by remapping encoder resource.
[how]
Add a function dc resource to update encoder resources and toggle
dpms state for all enabled stream associated witht the link under test.
Acked-by: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenjing Liu <wenjing.liu@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[why]
Pixel rate div depends on the type of encoder
that we are enabling stream with. If we swap between
HPO and DIO encoder at the time we call enable stream
for the new encoder, we must reprogram pixel rate div
based on the new encoder type.
Acked-by: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenjing Liu <wenjing.liu@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
