The BTI selftests are built both with and without BTI support, validating
both the generation of BTI signals as expected for binaries without BTI
support. Both versions of the binary currently skip all their tests when
the system does not support BTI, however this is excessive since we do have
a defined ABI for how the programs should function in this case (especially
for the non-BTI binary). Update the test program to run all the tests
unconditionally, adding a runtime adjustment of the expected results on
systems that don't support BTI where we currently handle the build time
case.
The tests all use HINT space instructions, BTI itself is a HINT as is
are the PAC instructions that function as landing pads, so nothing in the
tests depends on support for BTI in the kernel or hardware.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230110-arm64-bti-selftest-skip-v1-2-143ecdc84567@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
As documented in issue C215 in the known issues list for DDI0487I.a [1] Arm
will be making a retroactive change to SVE to remove the possibility of
selecting non power of two vector lengths. This has no impact on existing
physical implementations but most virtual implementations have implemented
the full range of permissible vector lengths. Given how demanding fp-stress
is for these implementations update to only attempt to enumerate the power
of two vector lengths, reducing the load created on existing virtual
implementations and only exercising the functionality that will be seen in
physical implementations.
[1] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/102105/ia-00/
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221220-arm64-fp-stress-pow2-v1-1-d0ce756b57af@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
As documented in issue C215 in the known issues list for DDI0487I.a [1] Arm
will be making a retroactive change to SVE to remove the possibility of
selecting non power of two vector lengths. This has no impact on existing
physical implementations but most virtual implementations have implemented
the full range of permissible vector lengths.
Since virtual implementations are noticeably slow in general and the larger
vector lengths amplify the issue there's a useful improvement in runtime
from only covering the vector lengths that will exist in practical systems,
adjust our enumeration accordingly. We have other tests that aim to cover
the enumeration interfaces.
For symmetry we apply the same change to the eumeration for SME vector
lengths, though the power of two restriction was already present for SME
so there is no impact on the set of vector lengths tested.
[1] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/102105/ia-00/
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221223-arm64-syscall-abi-sme-only-v1-4-4fabfbd62087@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Currently syscall-abi only covers SME in the case where the system supports
SVE however it is architecturally valid to support SME without SVE. Update
the program to cover this case, this requires adjustments in the code to
check for SVCR.SM being set when deciding if we're handling the FPSIMD or
SVE registers and the addition of new test cases for the SME only case.
Note that in the SME only case we should not save the SVE registers after a
syscall since even if we were in streaming mode and therefore set them the
syscall should have exited streaming mode, we check that we have done so by
looking at SVCR.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221223-arm64-syscall-abi-sme-only-v1-3-4fabfbd62087@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
* for-next/selftests:
kselftest/arm64: Allow epoll_wait() to return more than one result
kselftest/arm64: Don't drain output while spawning children
kselftest/arm64: Hold fp-stress children until they're all spawned
kselftest/arm64: Set test names prior to starting children
kselftest/arm64: Use preferred form for predicate load/stores
kselftest/arm64: fix array_size.cocci warning
kselftest/arm64: fix array_size.cocci warning
kselftest/arm64: Print ASCII version of unknown signal frame magic values
kselftest/arm64: Remove validation of extra_context from TODO
kselftest/arm64: Provide progress messages when signalling children
kselftest/arm64: Check that all children are producing output in fp-stress
When everything is starting up we are likely to have a lot of child
processes producing output at once. This means that we can reduce
overhead a bit by allowing epoll_wait() to return more than one
descriptor at once, it cuts down on the number of system calls we need
to do which on virtual platforms where the syscall overhead is a bit
more noticable and we're likely to have a lot more children active can
make a small but noticable difference.
On physical platforms the relatively small number of processes being run
and vastly improved speeds push the effects of this change into the
noise.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221129215926.442895-4-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
At present fp-stress has a bit of a thundering herd problem since the
children it spawns start running immediately, meaning that they can start
starving the parent process of CPU before it has even started all the
children. This is much more severe on virtual platforms since they tend to
support far more SVE and SME vector lengths, be slower in general and for
some have issues with performance when simulating multiple CPUs.
We can mitigate this problem by having all the child processes block before
starting the test program, meaning that we at least have all the child
processes started before we start heavily using CPU. We still have the same
load issues while waiting for the actual stress test programs to start up
and produce output but they're at least all ready to go before that kicks
in, resulting in substantial reductions in overall runtime on some of the
severely affected systems. One test was showing about 20% improvement.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221129215926.442895-2-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Fix following coccicheck warning:
tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/check_mmap_options.c:64:24-25:
WARNING: Use ARRAY_SIZE
tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/check_mmap_options.c:66:20-21:
WARNING: Use ARRAY_SIZE
tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/check_mmap_options.c:135:25-26:
WARNING: Use ARRAY_SIZE
tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/check_mmap_options.c:96:25-26:
WARNING: Use ARRAY_SIZE
tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/check_mmap_options.c:190:24-25:
WARNING: Use ARRAY_SIZE
Signed-off-by: KaiLong Wang <wangkailong@jari.cn>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/777ce8ba.12e.184705d4211.Coremail.wangkailong@jari.cn
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Use ARRAY_SIZE to fix the following coccicheck warnings:
tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/check_buffer_fill.c:341:20-21:
WARNING: Use ARRAY_SIZE
tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/check_buffer_fill.c:35:20-21:
WARNING: Use ARRAY_SIZE
tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/check_buffer_fill.c:168:20-21:
WARNING: Use ARRAY_SIZE
tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/check_buffer_fill.c:72:20-21:
WARNING: Use ARRAY_SIZE
tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/check_buffer_fill.c:369:25-26:
WARNING: Use ARRAY_SIZE
Signed-off-by: Kang Minchul <tegongkang@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221105073143.78521-1-tegongkang@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Currently we don't have an explicit check that when it's been a second
since we have seen output produced from the test programs starting up that
means all of them are running and we should start both sending signals and
timing out. This is not reliable, especially on very heavily loaded systems
where the test programs might take longer than a second to run.
We do skip sending signals to children that have not produced output yet
so we won't cause them to exit unexpectedly by sending a signal but this
can create confusion when interpreting output, for example appearing to
show the tests running for less time than expected or appearing to show
missed signal deliveries. Avoid issues by explicitly checking that we have
seen output from all the child processes before we start sending signals
or counting test run time.
This is especially likely on virtual platforms with large numbers of vector
lengths supported since the platforms are slow and there will be a lot of
tasks per CPU.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221017144553.773176-2-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
* for-next/kselftest: (28 commits)
: Kselftest updates for arm64
kselftest/arm64: Handle EINTR while reading data from children
kselftest/arm64: Flag fp-stress as exiting when we begin finishing up
kselftest/arm64: Don't repeat termination handler for fp-stress
kselftest/arm64: Don't enable v8.5 for MTE selftest builds
kselftest/arm64: Fix typo in hwcap check
kselftest/arm64: Add hwcap test for RNG
kselftest/arm64: Add SVE 2 to the tested hwcaps
kselftest/arm64: Add missing newline in hwcap output
kselftest/arm64: Fix spelling misakes of signal names
kselftest/arm64: Enforce actual ABI for SVE syscalls
kselftest/arm64: Correct buffer allocation for SVE Z registers
kselftest/arm64: Include larger SVE and SME VLs in signal tests
kselftest/arm64: Allow larger buffers in get_signal_context()
kselftest/arm64: Preserve any EXTRA_CONTEXT in handle_signal_copyctx()
kselftest/arm64: Validate contents of EXTRA_CONTEXT blocks
kselftest/arm64: Only validate each signal context once
kselftest/arm64: Remove unneeded protype for validate_extra_context()
kselftest/arm64: Fix validation of EXTRA_CONTEXT signal context location
kselftest/arm64: Fix validatation termination record after EXTRA_CONTEXT
kselftest/arm64: Validate signal ucontext in place
...
Currently we treat any error when reading from the child as a failure and
don't read any more output from that child as a result. This ignores the
fact that it is valid for read() to return EINTR as the error code if there
is a signal pending so we could stop handling the output of children,
especially during exit when we will get some SIGCHLD signals delivered to
us. Fix this by pulling the read handling out into a separate function
which returns a flag if reads should be continued and wrapping it in a
loop.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220921181345.618085-4-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
When fp-stress gets a termination signal it sets a flag telling itself to
exit and sends a termination signal to all the children. If the flag is set
then don't bother repeating this process, it isn't going to accomplish
anything other than consume CPU time which can be an issue when running in
emulation.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220921181345.618085-2-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Currently we set -march=armv8.5+memtag when building the MTE selftests,
allowing the compiler to emit v8.5 and MTE instructions for anything it
generates. This means that we may get code that will generate SIGILLs when
run on older systems rather than skipping on non-MTE systems as should be
the case. Most toolchains don't select any incompatible instructions but
I have seen some reports which suggest that some may be appearing which do
so. This is also potentially problematic in that if the compiler chooses to
emit any MTE instructions for the C code it may interfere with the MTE
usage we are trying to test.
Since the only reason we are specifying this option is to allow us to
assemble MTE instructions in mte_helper.S we can avoid these issues by
moving to using a .arch directive there and adding the -march explicitly to
the toolchain support check instead of the generic CFLAGS.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220928154517.173108-1-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
We use a local variable hwcap to refer to the element of the hwcaps array
which we are currently checking. When checking for the relevant hwcap bit
being set in testing we were dereferencing hwcaps rather than hwcap in
fetching the AT_HWCAP to use, which is perfectly valid C but means we were
always checking the bit was set in the hwcap for whichever feature is first
in the array. Remove the stray s.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220907113400.12982-1-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Extend the ptrace test support for NT_ARM_TLS to cover TPIDR2_EL0 - on
systems that support SME the NT_ARM_TLS regset can be up to 2 elements
long with the second element containing TPIDR2_EL0. On systems
supporting SME we verify that this value can be read and written while
on systems that do not support SME we verify correct truncation of reads
and writes.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220829154921.837871-5-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Currently syscall-abi permits the bits in Z registers not shared with the
V registers as well as all of the predicate registers to be preserved on
syscall but the actual implementation has always cleared them and our
documentation has now been updated to make that the documented ABI so
update the syscall-abi test to match.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220829162502.886816-4-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
The buffer used for verifying SVE Z registers allocated enough space for
16 maximally sized registers rather than 32 due to using the macro for the
number of P registers. In practice this didn't matter since for historical
reasons the maximum VQ defined in the ABI is greater the architectural
maximum so we will always allocate more space than is needed even with
emulated platforms implementing the architectural maximum. Still, we should
use the right define.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220829162502.886816-2-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Now that the core utilities for signal testing support handling data in
EXTRA_CONTEXT blocks we can test larger SVE and SME VLs which spill over
the limits in the base signal context. This is done by defining storage
for the context as a union with a ucontext_t and a buffer together with
some helpers for getting relevant sizes and offsets like we do for
fake_sigframe, this isn't the most lovely code ever but is fairly
straightforward to implement and much less invasive to the somewhat
unclear and indistinct layers of abstraction in the signal handling test
code.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220829160703.874492-11-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
When preserving the signal context for later verification by testcases
check for and include any EXTRA_CONTEXT block if enough space has been
provided.
Since the EXTRA_CONTEXT block includes a pointer to the start of the
additional data block we need to do at least some fixup on the copied
data. For simplicity in users we do this by extending the length of
the EXTRA_CONTEXT to include the following termination record, this
will cause users to see the extra data as part of the linked list of
contexts without needing any special handling. Care will be needed if
any specific tests for EXTRA_CONTEXT are added beyond the validation
done in ASSERT_GOOD_CONTEXT.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220829160703.874492-9-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Currently in validate_reserved() we check the basic form and contents of
an EXTRA_CONTEXT block but do not actually validate anything inside the
data block it provides. Extend the validation to do so, when we get to the
terminator for the main data block reset and start walking the extra data
block instead.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220829160703.874492-8-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Currently for the more complex signal context types we validate the context
specific details the end of the parsing loop validate_reserved() if we've
ever seen a context of that type. This is currently merely a bit inefficient
but will get a bit awkward when we start parsing extra_context, at which
point we will need to reset the head to advance into the extra space that
extra_context provides. Instead only do the more detailed checks on each
context type the first time we see that context type.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220829160703.874492-7-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
