The common reserved-memory bindings have recently been copied from the
kernel tree into dtschema. The preference is to host common, stable
bindings in dtschema. As reserved-memory is documented in the DT Spec,
it meets the criteria.
The v2023.09 version of dtschema is what contains the reserved-memory
schemas we depend on, so bump the minimum version to that. Otherwise,
references to these schemas will generate errors.
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231013200851.347042-1-robh@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Introduce the new compatible string, restricted-dma-pool, for restricted
DMA. One can specify the address and length of the restricted DMA memory
region by restricted-dma-pool in the reserved-memory node.
Signed-off-by: Claire Chang <tientzu@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
In order to make the reserved-memory bindings more consistent with other
existing bindings, add a memory-region-names property that contains an
array of strings that name the entries of the memory-region property and
allows these regions to be looked up by name.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Reserved memory nodes allow for the reservation of static (fixed
address) regions, or dynamically allocated regions for a specific
purpose.
[joshc: Based on binding document proposed (in non-patch form) here:
http://lkml.kernel.org/g/20131030134702.19B57C402A0@trevor.secretlab.ca
adapted to support #memory-region-cells]
Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright <joshc@codeaurora.org>
[mszyprow: removed #memory-region-cells property]
Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
[grant.likely: removed residual #memory-region-cells example]
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
