[why]
When populating dml pipes, odm combine policy should be assigned based
on the pipe topology of the context passed in. DML pipes could be
repopulated multiple times during single validate bandwidth attempt. We
need to make sure that whenever we repopulate the dml pipes it is always
aligned with the updated context. There is a case where DML pipes get
repopulated during FPO optimization after ODM combine policy is changed.
Since in the current code we reinitlaize ODM combine policy, even though
the current context has ODM combine enabled, we overwrite it despite the
pipes are already split. This causes DML to think that MPC combine is
used so we mistakenly enable MPC combine because we apply pipe split
with ODM combine policy reset. This issue doesn't impact non windowed
MPO with ODM case because the legacy policy has restricted use cases. We
don't encounter the case where both ODM and FPO optimizations are
enabled together. So we decide to leave it as is because it is about to
be replaced anyway.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.6+
Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Dhere <chaitanya.dhere@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alvin Lee <alvin.lee2@amd.com>
Acked-by: Hamza Mahfooz <hamza.mahfooz@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenjing Liu <wenjing.liu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why & How]
For FPO and SubVP/DRR cases we need to ensure to program
OTG_V_TOTAL_MIN/MAX_SEL, otherwise stretching the vblank
in FPO / SubVP / DRR cases will not have any effect
and we could hit underflow / corruption.
Reviewed-by: Alvin Lee <alvin.lee2@amd.com>
Acked-by: Tom Chung <chiahsuan.chung@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alvin Lee <alvin.lee2@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[why]
Originally, PMFW said min FCLK is 300Mhz, but min DCFCLK can be increased
to 400Mhz because min FCLK is now 600Mhz so FCLK >= 1.5 * DCFCLK hardware
requirement will still be satisfied. Increasing min DCFCLK addresses
underflow issues (underflow occurs when phantom pipe is turned on for some
Sub-Viewport configs).
[how]
Increasing DCFCLK by raising the min_dcfclk_mhz
Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Dhere <chaitanya.dhere@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alvin Lee <alvin.lee2@amd.com>
Acked-by: Tom Chung <chiahsuan.chung@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Sohaib Nadeem <sohaib.nadeem@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
For FPO and SubVP/DRR cases we need to ensure to program
OTG_V_TOTAL_MIN/MAX_SEL, otherwise stretching the vblank in FPO / SubVP
/ DRR cases will not have any effect and we could hit underflow /
corruption.
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Aric Cyr <aric.cyr@amd.com>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <rodrigo.siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alvin Lee <alvin.lee2@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
In DCN32/321 FPO uses per-pipe P-State force. If there is no plane, then
then HUBP is power gated, in which case any programming in HUBP has no
effect and the pipe is always asserting P-State allow. This is contrary
to what we want to happen for FPO (FW should moderate the P-State
assertion), so block FPO if there's no plane for the FPO pipe.
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <rodrigo.siqueira@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Samson Tam <samson.tam@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Dhere <chaitanya.dhere@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alvin Lee <alvin.lee2@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[WHY?]
Phantom streams and planes were previously not referenced explcitly on creation.
[HOW?]
To reduce memory management complexity, add an additional phantom streams and planes
reference into dc_state, and move mall_stream_config to stream_status inside
the state to make it safe to modify in shallow copies. Also consildates any logic
that is affected by this change to dc_state.
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <jun.lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Wayne Lin <wayne.lin@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Dillon Varone <dillon.varone@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[WHY?]
Part of the dc_state interface that deals with adding streams and planes should
remain public, while others that deal with internal status' and subvp should be
private to DC.
[HOW?]
Move and rename the public functions to dc_state.h and private functions to
dc_state_priv.h. Also add some additional functions for extracting subvp meta
data from the state.
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <jun.lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Wayne Lin <wayne.lin@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Dillon Varone <dillon.varone@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Description]
For mode programming we want to extend the prefetch as much as possible
(up to oto, or as long as we can for equ) if we're not already applying
the 60us prefetch requirement. This is to avoid intermittent underflow
issues during prefetch.
The prefetch extension is applied under the following scenarios:
1. We're in prefetch mode 1 (i.e. we don't support MCLK switch in blank)
2. We're using subvp or drr methods of p-state switch, in which case we
we don't care if prefetch takes up more of the blanking time
Mode programming typically chooses the smallest prefetch time possible
(i.e. highest bandwidth during prefetch) presumably to create margin between
p-states / c-states that happen in vblank and prefetch. Therefore we only
apply this prefetch extension when p-state in vblank is not required (UCLK
p-states take up the most vblank time).
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <jun.lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alvin Lee <alvin.lee2@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[why]
When querying DML for a vlevel after pipes have been split or merged the
ODM policy would revert to a default policy, which could cause the query
to use the incorrect ODM status. In this case ODM 2to1 was validated,
but the last DML query would assume no ODM and return the incorrect
vlevel.
[how]
Added ODM check to apply the correct ODM policy before querying DML.
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alvin Lee <alvin.lee2@amd.com>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <rodrigo.siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Relja Vojvodic <relja.vojvodic@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Description]
- To reduce vlevel further, we can try to apply subvp on
configs that already support p-state since the natural
p-state support may not allow for DPM0.
- Add code to try subvp to reduce UCLK DPM level further
if already supported, but don't use subvp if it does not
optimize the DPM level even lower
Reviewed-by: Samson Tam <samson.tam@amd.com>
Acked-by: Hamza Mahfooz <hamza.mahfooz@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alvin Lee <alvin.lee2@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Description]
- Previously SubVP would never be selected on 1080p60 displays because
it has too much vactive margin. However, implement a change to allow
it like how 1440p60 is allowed.
- Add a new struct such that we have a list of allowed modes for
enabling subvp with vactive margin (currently 1080p60 and 1440p60)
- Also ensure to block drr + vblank cases to prevent unexpected
enablement of new display configs
- Update SW cursor fallback for these new potential cases as well
Reviewed-by: Samson Tam <samson.tam@amd.com>
Acked-by: Hamza Mahfooz <hamza.mahfooz@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alvin Lee <alvin.lee2@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Description]
When choosing which dummy p-state latency to use, we
need to use the DRAM speed from validation. The DRAMSpeed
DML variable can change because we use different input
params to DML when populating watermarks set B.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Reviewed-by: Samson Tam <samson.tam@amd.com>
Acked-by: Hamza Mahfooz <hamza.mahfooz@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alvin Lee <alvin.lee2@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[why]
In dcn32 DML pipes are ordered the same as dc pipes but only for used
pipes. For example, if dc pipe 1 and 2 are used, their dml pipe indices
would be 0 and 1 respectively. However
update_pipe_slice_table_with_split_flags doesn't skip indices for free
pipes. This causes us to not reference correct dml pipe output when
building pipe topology.
[how]
Use two variables to iterate dc and dml pipes respectively and only
increment dml pipe index when current dc pipe is not free.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Dhere <chaitanya.dhere@amd.com>
Acked-by: Hamza Mahfooz <hamza.mahfooz@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenjing Liu <wenjing.liu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
Enabling DPG causes HUBP to stay in blank constantly. If DPG is enabled
while an MCLK switch is taking place with SubVP, it will cause the MCLK
to never complete. This is because SubVP MCLK switch relies a HUBP
VLine interrupt, which will never occur when HUBP is constantly in
blank.
[How]
Disable SubVP when test pattern is enabled.
Reviewed-by: Alvin Lee <alvin.lee2@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Nevenko Stupar <nevenko.stupar@amd.com>
Acked-by: Tom Chung <chiahsuan.chung@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: George Shen <george.shen@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
DC is transitioning from DML to DML2, and this commit introduces all the
required changes for some of the already available ASICs and adds the
required code infra to support new ASICs under DML2. DML2 is also a
generated code that provides better mode verification and programming
models for software/hardware, and it enables a better way to create
validation tools. This version is more like a middle step to the
complete transition to the DML2 version.
Changes since V1:
- Alex: Fix typos
Changes since V2:
- Update DC includes
Changes since V3:
- Fix 32 bit compilation issues on x86
Changes since V4:
- Avoid compilation of DML2 on some not supported 32-bit architecture
- Update commit message
Co-developed-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Co-developed-by: Roman Li <roman.li@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Roman Li <roman.li@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Qingqing Zhuo <Qingqing.Zhuo@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[why]
There is a corner use case where the same plane pointer can be added into
dc state twice. In addition to plane state pointer check we also need to match
primary pipe before identifying the same plane.
Reviewed-by: Dillon Varone <dillon.varone@amd.com>
Acked-by: Wayne Lin <wayne.lin@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenjing Liu <wenjing.liu@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[why]
ODM power optimization excludes subvp power optimization but subvp
optimization can override ODM power optimization even if subvp optimization
configuration is not found. This happens with 4k144hz + 1 5k desktop plane.
We could have applied ODM power optimization however this is overridden by
subvp but subvp ends up deciding not apply its optimization.
[how]
Move ODM power optimization decision after subvp so it will try ODM power
optimization after subvp optimization is not possible.
Reviewed-by: Dillon Varone <dillon.varone@amd.com>
Acked-by: Stylon Wang <stylon.wang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenjing Liu <wenjing.liu@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Why:
vrr_active_fixed should also be checked when
determining if DRR is in use
How:
Add check for vrr_active_fixed when allow_freesync
and vrr_active_variable are also checked
Reviewed-by: Alvin Lee <alvin.lee2@amd.com>
Acked-by: Stylon Wang <stylon.wang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Austin Zheng <austin.zheng@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[why]
Current dc update design has limitation to support transition from
ODM combine to minimum transition to MPC combine state seamlessly
at the capability boundary when MPO plane is resizing. This will
require dc update high level refactor in order to remove the design
limitation. The decision is to block such use case for existing products
by limiting ODM power optimization support for only those surfaces
within guaranteed viewport size. This will prevent us from transitioning
to MPC combine state when ODM power optimization is enabled.
Reviewed-by: Dillon Varone <dillon.varone@amd.com>
Acked-by: Stylon Wang <stylon.wang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenjing Liu <wenjing.liu@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[why]
In some cases such as 8k desktop surface with 144Hz timing, we decide to
enable ODM power optimization but this surface doesn't have a minimum
transition state. Therefore we cannot switch off ODM power optimization seamlessly
This creates path depedency on ODM power optimization decision. i.e
whether or not we should switch off ODM power optimization is dependent
on if the transition to switch off ODM power optimization from current state
is seamless. We don't desire a path dependent power optimization policy
as it is too dynamic and difficult to maintain.
[how]
Attempt ODM power optimization only after we can validate new state without
using pipe combine.
Reviewed-by: Dillon Varone <dillon.varone@amd.com>
Acked-by: Stylon Wang <stylon.wang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenjing Liu <wenjing.liu@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[why]
The result of predict_pipe_split calculation is no longer used but the
function is not removed. This will cause unnecessary calculation
of pipe split prediction in every frame update.
Reviewed-by: Dillon Varone <dillon.varone@amd.com>
Acked-by: Stylon Wang <stylon.wang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenjing Liu <wenjing.liu@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
This commit implements a new pipe resource allocation logic for DCN32
when windowed ODM MPO flag is set to enable testing. By default the
flag is not set. It will be toggled on after we complete testing.
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <jun.lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Hamza Mahfooz <hamza.mahfooz@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenjing Liu <wenjing.liu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
- Override the det to adjust microschedule timings allow for
1080p configs with SubVP
- To lower unnecessary risk, we prevent multi 1080p configs
from using SubVP, as multi 1080p already has low idle power.
- Count the number of streams to verify that we are in a
SubVP config before overriding
Reviewed-by: Alvin Lee <alvin.lee2@amd.com>
Acked-by: Hamza Mahfooz <hamza.mahfooz@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Ethan Bitnun <ethan.bitnun@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Description]
SubVP needs to "calculate" the earliest in use META address
by using the current primary / meta addresses, but this leads
to a race condition where FW and driver can read/write the
address at the same time and intermittently produce inconsistent
address offsets. To mitigate this issue without locking (too slow),
save each surface flip addr into scratch registers and use this
to keep track of the earliest in use META addres.
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <jun.lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Wayne Lin <wayne.lin@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alvin Lee <alvin.lee2@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[why]
There is a lack of encapsulation of pipe connection representation in pipe context.
This has caused many challenging bugs and coding errors with repeated
logic to identify the same pipe type.
[how]
Formally define pipe types and provide getters to identify a pipe type and
find a pipe based on specific requirements. Update existing logic in non dcn
specific files and dcn32 and future versions to use the new accessors.
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <jun.lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Stylon Wang <stylon.wang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenjing Liu <wenjing.liu@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
Current recout calculation has a few assumptions and implementation
for MPO + ODM combine calculation is very specific. The equation has
too many cases without enough comments to document the detail.
[How]
The change remove the following assumptions:
1. When MPO is enabled, we only allow ODM Combine 2:1
2. ODM Combine always has even segment width.
3. Secondary MPO plane's pipe_ctx copies pre_odm_pipe from
its top pipe.
The change applies a generic formula with more details in comment to
document this solution so it is eaiser to learn and debug later.
Reviewed-by: Dmytro Laktyushkin <dmytro.laktyushkin@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alex Hung <alex.hung@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenjing Liu <wenjing.liu@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
Want to further constrain these refresh rate conditions for SubVP:
- SubVP + SubVP: either both <= 120Hz or both between 120-165Hz
- SubVP + DRR: SubVP <= 120Hz
- SubVP + VBlank: SubVP <= 120Hz
[How]
Add constraints in subvp_subvp_admissable(),
dcn32_subvp_drr_admissable() and dcn32_subvp_vblank_admissable()
Reviewed-by: Alvin Lee <alvin.lee2@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alan Liu <haoping.liu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Samson Tam <samson.tam@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Description]
- SubVP high refresh should only be enabled if all displays
are >= 120hz. We do not want to accidentally enables configs
such as 60hz[SubVP] + 120hz[SubVP]
- Ensure that the SubVP config generation code does not produce
configs such as 60hz[SubVP] + 120hz[SubVP]
- Also add admissibility checks to ensure these configs do not
pass as valid configs
Acked-by: Stylon Wang <stylon.wang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alvin Lee <alvin.lee2@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Dillon Varone <Dillon.Varone@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Why:
Limit maximum clock speeds to DC mode limits for DC mode systems
How:
Store DC mode limits when individual clocks are initialized and
cap the values when building the clock table
Acked-by: Stylon Wang <stylon.wang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Austin Zheng <austin.zheng@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alvin Lee <Alvin.Lee2@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Fixes the following gcc with W=1:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/dcn32/dcn32_fpu.c:2806: warning: Cannot understand * *************************************************************************
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/dcn32/dcn32_fpu.c:2855: warning: Cannot understand * *************************************************************************
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/dcn32/dcn32_fpu.c:2900: warning: Function parameter or member 'dc' not described in 'dcn32_assign_fpo_vactive_candidate'
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/dcn32/dcn32_fpu.c:2900: warning: Function parameter or member 'context' not described in 'dcn32_assign_fpo_vactive_candidate'
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/dcn32/dcn32_fpu.c:2900: warning: Function parameter or member 'fpo_candidate_stream' not described in 'dcn32_assign_fpo_vactive_candidate'
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/dcn32/dcn32_fpu.c:2929: warning: Function parameter or member 'dc' not described in 'dcn32_find_vactive_pipe'
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/dcn32/dcn32_fpu.c:2929: warning: Function parameter or member 'context' not described in 'dcn32_find_vactive_pipe'
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/dcn32/dcn32_fpu.c:2929: warning: Function parameter or member 'vactive_margin_req_us' not described in 'dcn32_find_vactive_pipe'
Cc: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Cc: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Cc: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Srinivasan Shanmugam <srinivasan.shanmugam@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Description]
- Previously we wanted to apply extra 60us of prefetch for min DCFCLK
(200Mhz), but DCFCLK can be calculated to be 201Mhz which underflows
also without the extra prefetch
- Instead, apply the the extra 60us prefetch for any DCFCLK freq <=
300Mhz
Reviewed-by: Nevenko Stupar <nevenko.stupar@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <jun.lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Tom Chung <chiahsuan.chung@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alvin Lee <alvin.lee2@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why && How]
We would like to have visual confirm color support for MCLK switch.
1. Set visual confirm color to yellow: Vblank MCLK switch.
2. Set visual confirm color to cyan: FPO + Vblank MCLK
switch.
3. Set visual confirm color to pink: Vactive MCLK switch.
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <jun.lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Leo (Hanghong) Ma <hanghong.ma@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
