The address of a data structure member was determined before
a corresponding null pointer check in the implementation of
the function “receive_timing_debugfs_show”.
Thus avoid the risk for undefined behaviour by moving the assignment
for the variable “vid” behind the null pointer check.
This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
Fixes: b5c84a9edc ("drm/bridge: add it6505 driver")
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/fa69384f-1485-142b-c4ee-3df54ac68a89@web.de
Reviewed-by: Robert Foss <rfoss@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Robert Foss <rfoss@kernel.org>
This bridge doesn't actually implement HPD due to it being way too slow
but instead expects the panel driver to wait enough to assume HPD is
asserted. However some panels (such as the generic 'edp-panel') expect
the bridge to deal with the delay and pass maximum delay to the aux
instead.
In order to support such panels, add a dummy implementation of wait
that would just sleep the maximum delay and assume no failure has
happened.
Signed-off-by: Nikita Travkin <nikita@trvn.ru>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230408082014.235425-1-nikita@trvn.ru
Backmerging drm-next to sync with msm tree. Resolves a conflict
between aperture-helper changes and msm's use of those interfaces.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
i.MX6SX has a single LVDS port and share a similar LDB_CTRL register layout
with i.MX8MP and i.MX93.
There is no LVDS CTRL register on the i.MX6SX, so only write to
this register on the appropriate SoCs.
Add support for the i.MX6SX LDB.
Tested on a imx6sx-sdb board with a Hannstar HSD100PXN1 LVDS panel
and also on a custom i.MX6SX-based board.
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@denx.de>
Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230404020129.509356-2-festevam@gmail.com
main pull request for v6.4
Core Display:
============
* Bugfixes for error handling during probe
* rework UBWC decoder programming
* prepare_commit cleanup
* bindings for SM8550 (MDSS, DPU), SM8450 (DP)
* timeout calculation fixup
* atomic: use drm_crtc_next_vblank_start() instead of our own
custom thing to calculate the start of next vblank
DP:
==
* interrupts cleanup
DPU:
===
* DSPP sub-block flush on sc7280
* support AR30 in addition to XR30 format
* Allow using REC_0 and REC_1 to handle wide (4k) RGB planes
* Split the HW catalog into individual per-SoC files
DSI:
===
* rework DSI instance ID detection on obscure platforms
GPU:
===
* uapi C++ compatibility fix
* a6xx: More robust gdsc reset
* a3xx and a4xx devfreq support
* update generated headers
* various cleanups and fixes
* GPU and GEM updates to avoid allocations which could trigger
reclaim (shrinker) in fence signaling path
* dma-fence deadline hint support and wait-boost
* a640 speedbin support
* a650 speedbin support
Conflicts in drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c:
Conflict between the 7fa5047a43 ("drm: Use of_property_present() for
testing DT property presence") and 9f251f9340 ("drm/msm/adreno: Use
OPP for every GPU generation"). The latter removed the of_ function
call outright, so I went with what's in the PR unchanged.
From: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/CAF6AEGvwuj5tabyW910+N-B=5kFNAC7QNYoQ=0xi3roBjQvFFQ@mail.gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
The LDB driver currently checks whether dual mode is used, otherwise it
assumes only channel 0 is in use. Add support for using only channel 1. In
device tree terms, this means linking port 2 only.
Doing this cleanly requires changing the logic of the probe functions from
this:
1. use of_graph_get_remote_node() on port 1 to find the panel
2. use drm_of_lvds_get_dual_link_pixel_order() to detect dual mode
to this:
1. use of_graph_get_remote_node() twice to find remote ports
2. reuse the result of the above to know whether each channel is enabled
and to find the panel
3. if (both channels as enabled)
use drm_of_lvds_get_dual_link_pixel_order() to detect dual mode
Also add a dev_dbg() to log the detected mode and log an error in case no
panel was found (no channel enabled).
Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: Robert Foss <rfoss@kernel.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230405081058.2347130-2-luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com
The TC358767/TC358867/TC9595 are capable of DSI burst mode, which
is more energy efficient than the non-burst modes. Make use of it.
The TC358767/TC358867/TC9595 are capable of DSI non-continuous clock,
since it sources the internal PLL clock from external clock source.
The DSI non-continuous clock further reduces power utilization.
The TC358767/TC358867/TC9595 may use DSI LPM for command transmissions,
make sure this is configured correctly in the DSI mode flags.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221016003632.406468-1-marex@denx.de
I just landed the fence deadline PR from Rob that a bunch of drivers
want/need to apply driver-specific patches. Backmerge -rc4 so that
they don't have to be stuck on -rc2 for no reason at all.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Samsung MIPI DSIM controller is common DSI IP that can be used in various
SoCs like Exynos, i.MX8M Mini/Nano.
In order to access this DSI controller between various platform SoCs,
the ideal way to incorporate this in the drm stack is via the drm bridge
driver.
We already have a consolidated code for supporting component and bridge
based DRM drivers, so keep the exynos component based code in existing
exynos_drm_dsi.c and move generic bridge code as part of samsung-dsim.c
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
Merge drm-next into msm-next to pick up external clk and PM dependencies
for improved a6xx GPU reset sequence.
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230318190804.234610-20-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230318190804.234610-19-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230318190804.234610-18-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230318190804.234610-17-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230318190804.234610-16-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230318190804.234610-15-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230318190804.234610-14-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230318190804.234610-13-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230318190804.234610-12-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230318190804.234610-11-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230318190804.234610-10-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230318190804.234610-9-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230318190804.234610-8-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230318190804.234610-7-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230318190804.234610-6-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230318190804.234610-5-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230318190804.234610-3-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
When dynamically switching lanes was removed, the intent of the code
was to check to make sure that higher speed items used 4 lanes, but
it had the unintended consequence of removing the slower speeds for
4-lane users.
This attempts to remedy this by doing a check to see that the
max frequency doesn't exceed the chip limit, and a second
check to make sure that the max bit-rate doesn't exceed the
number of lanes * max bit rate / lane.
Fixes: 9a0cdcd664 ("drm/bridge: adv7533: remove dynamic lane switching from adv7533 bridge")
Reviewed-by: Robert Foss <rfoss@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Foss <rfoss@kernel.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230319125524.58803-1-aford173@gmail.com
