Pull drm fixes from Dave Airlie:
"Things do seem to have finally settled down, just four i915 and one
amdgpu this week. Probably won't have much for next week if you do
push rc8 out.
i915:
- Fix dram info readout
- Remove non-existent pipes from bigjoiner pipe mask
- Fix negative value passed as remaining time
- Never return 0 if not all requests retired
amdgpu:
- VCN fix for vangogh"
* tag 'drm-fixes-2022-12-02' of git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm:
drm/amdgpu: enable Vangogh VCN indirect sram mode
drm/i915: Never return 0 if not all requests retired
drm/i915: Fix negative value passed as remaining time
drm/i915: Remove non-existent pipes from bigjoiner pipe mask
drm/i915/mtl: Fix dram info readout
Starting with MTL, the driver needs to not only protect the steering
control register from simultaneous software accesses, but also protect
against races with hardware/firmware agents. The hardware provides a
dedicated locking mechanism to support this via the MTL_STEER_SEMAPHORE
register. Reading the register acts as a 'trylock' operation; the read
will return 0x1 if the lock is acquired or 0x0 if something else is
already holding the lock; once acquired, writing 0x1 to the register
will release the lock.
We'll continue to grab the software lock as well, just so lockdep can
track our locking; assuming the hardware lock is behaving properly,
there should never be any contention on the software lock in this case.
v2:
- Extend hardware semaphore timeout and add a taint for CI if it ever
happens (this would imply misbehaving hardware/firmware). (Mika)
- Add "MTL_" prefix to new steering semaphore register. (Mika)
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Balasubramani Vivekanandan <balasubramani.vivekanandan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221128233014.4000136-5-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
The GuC firmware includes an extra version number to specify the
submission API level. So use that rather than the main firmware
version number for submission related checks.
Also, while it is guaranteed that GuC version number components are
only 8-bits in size, other firmwares do not have that restriction. So
stop making assumptions about them generically fitting in a u16
individually, or in a u32 as a combined 8.8.8.
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221129232031.3401386-4-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com
We've been overloading uncore->lock to protect access to the MCR
steering register. That's not really what uncore->lock is intended for,
and it would be better if we didn't need to hold such a high-traffic
spinlock for the whole sequence of (apply steering, access MCR register,
restore steering). Let's create a dedicated MCR lock to protect the
steering control register over this critical section and stop relying on
the high-traffic uncore->lock.
For now the new lock is a software lock. However some platforms (MTL
and beyond) have a hardware-provided locking mechanism that can be used
to serialize not only software accesses, but also hardware/firmware
accesses as well; support for that hardware level lock will be added in
a future patch.
v2:
- Use irqsave/irqrestore spinlock calls; platforms using execlist
submission rather than GuC submission can perform MCR accesses in
interrupt context because reset -> errordump happens in a tasklet.
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris.p.wilson@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Balasubramani Vivekanandan <balasubramani.vivekanandan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Balasubramani Vivekanandan <balasubramani.vivekanandan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221128233014.4000136-4-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
In case of Gen12 video and compute engines, TLB_INV registers are masked -
to modify one bit, corresponding bit in upper half of the register must
be enabled, otherwise nothing happens.
CVE: CVE-2022-4139
Suggested-by: Chris Wilson <chris.p.wilson@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Fixes: 7938d61591 ("drm/i915: Flush TLBs before releasing backing store")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Users of intel_gt_retire_requests_timeout() expect 0 return value on
success. However, we have no protection from passing back 0 potentially
returned by a call to dma_fence_wait_timeout() when it succedes right
after its timeout has expired.
Replace 0 with -ETIME before potentially using the timeout value as return
code, so -ETIME is returned if there are still some requests not retired
after timeout, 0 otherwise.
v3: Use conditional expression, more compact but also better reflecting
intention standing behind the change.
v2: Move the added lines down so flush_submission() is not affected.
Fixes: f33a8a5160 ("drm/i915: Merge wait_for_timelines with retire_request")
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.5+
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221121145655.75141-3-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
(cherry picked from commit f301a29f14)
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Commit b97060a99b ("drm/i915/guc: Update intel_gt_wait_for_idle to work
with GuC") extended the API of intel_gt_retire_requests_timeout() with an
extra argument 'remaining_timeout', intended for passing back unconsumed
portion of requested timeout when 0 (success) is returned. However, when
request retirement happens to succeed despite an error returned by a call
to dma_fence_wait_timeout(), that error code (a negative value) is passed
back instead of remaining time. If we then pass that negative value
forward as requested timeout to intel_uc_wait_for_idle(), an explicit BUG
will be triggered.
If request retirement succeeds but an error code is passed back via
remaininig_timeout, we may have no clue on how much of the initial timeout
might have been left for spending it on waiting for GuC to become idle.
OTOH, since all pending requests have been successfully retired, that
error code has been already ignored by intel_gt_retire_requests_timeout(),
then we shouldn't fail.
Assume no more time has been left on error and pass 0 timeout value to
intel_uc_wait_for_idle() to give it a chance to return success if GuC is
already idle.
v3: Don't fail on any error passed back via remaining_timeout.
v2: Fix the issue on the caller side, not the provider.
Fixes: b97060a99b ("drm/i915/guc: Update intel_gt_wait_for_idle to work with GuC")
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.15+
Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221121145655.75141-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
(cherry picked from commit f235dbd5b7)
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Users of intel_gt_retire_requests_timeout() expect 0 return value on
success. However, we have no protection from passing back 0 potentially
returned by a call to dma_fence_wait_timeout() when it succedes right
after its timeout has expired.
Replace 0 with -ETIME before potentially using the timeout value as return
code, so -ETIME is returned if there are still some requests not retired
after timeout, 0 otherwise.
v3: Use conditional expression, more compact but also better reflecting
intention standing behind the change.
v2: Move the added lines down so flush_submission() is not affected.
Fixes: f33a8a5160 ("drm/i915: Merge wait_for_timelines with retire_request")
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.5+
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221121145655.75141-3-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
(cherry picked from commit f301a29f14)
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Commit b97060a99b ("drm/i915/guc: Update intel_gt_wait_for_idle to work
with GuC") extended the API of intel_gt_retire_requests_timeout() with an
extra argument 'remaining_timeout', intended for passing back unconsumed
portion of requested timeout when 0 (success) is returned. However, when
request retirement happens to succeed despite an error returned by a call
to dma_fence_wait_timeout(), that error code (a negative value) is passed
back instead of remaining time. If we then pass that negative value
forward as requested timeout to intel_uc_wait_for_idle(), an explicit BUG
will be triggered.
If request retirement succeeds but an error code is passed back via
remaininig_timeout, we may have no clue on how much of the initial timeout
might have been left for spending it on waiting for GuC to become idle.
OTOH, since all pending requests have been successfully retired, that
error code has been already ignored by intel_gt_retire_requests_timeout(),
then we shouldn't fail.
Assume no more time has been left on error and pass 0 timeout value to
intel_uc_wait_for_idle() to give it a chance to return success if GuC is
already idle.
v3: Don't fail on any error passed back via remaining_timeout.
v2: Fix the issue on the caller side, not the provider.
Fixes: b97060a99b ("drm/i915/guc: Update intel_gt_wait_for_idle to work with GuC")
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.15+
Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221121145655.75141-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
(cherry picked from commit f235dbd5b7)
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
On XE_LPM+ platforms the media engines are carved out into a separate
GT but have a common GGTMMADR address range which essentially makes
the GGTT address space to be shared between media and render GT. As a
result any updates in GGTT shall invalidate TLB of GTs sharing it and
similarly any operation on GGTT requiring an action on a GT will have to
involve all GTs sharing it. setup_private_pat was being done on a per
GGTT based as that doesn't touch any GGTT structures moved it to per GT
based.
BSPEC: 63834
v2:
1. Add details to commit msg
2. includes fix for failure to add item to ggtt->gt_list, as suggested
by Lucas
3. as ggtt_flush() is used only for ggtt drop i915_is_ggtt check within
it.
4. setup_private_pat moved out of intel_gt_tiles_init
v3:
1. Move out for_each_gt from i915_driver.c (Jani Nikula)
v4: drop using RCU primitives on ggtt->gt_list as it is not an RCU list
(Matt Roper)
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Aravind Iddamsetty <aravind.iddamsetty@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221122070126.4813-1-aravind.iddamsetty@intel.com
Users of intel_gt_retire_requests_timeout() expect 0 return value on
success. However, we have no protection from passing back 0 potentially
returned by a call to dma_fence_wait_timeout() when it succedes right
after its timeout has expired.
Replace 0 with -ETIME before potentially using the timeout value as return
code, so -ETIME is returned if there are still some requests not retired
after timeout, 0 otherwise.
v3: Use conditional expression, more compact but also better reflecting
intention standing behind the change.
v2: Move the added lines down so flush_submission() is not affected.
Fixes: f33a8a5160 ("drm/i915: Merge wait_for_timelines with retire_request")
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.5+
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221121145655.75141-3-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
Commit b97060a99b ("drm/i915/guc: Update intel_gt_wait_for_idle to work
with GuC") extended the API of intel_gt_retire_requests_timeout() with an
extra argument 'remaining_timeout', intended for passing back unconsumed
portion of requested timeout when 0 (success) is returned. However, when
request retirement happens to succeed despite an error returned by a call
to dma_fence_wait_timeout(), that error code (a negative value) is passed
back instead of remaining time. If we then pass that negative value
forward as requested timeout to intel_uc_wait_for_idle(), an explicit BUG
will be triggered.
If request retirement succeeds but an error code is passed back via
remaininig_timeout, we may have no clue on how much of the initial timeout
might have been left for spending it on waiting for GuC to become idle.
OTOH, since all pending requests have been successfully retired, that
error code has been already ignored by intel_gt_retire_requests_timeout(),
then we shouldn't fail.
Assume no more time has been left on error and pass 0 timeout value to
intel_uc_wait_for_idle() to give it a chance to return success if GuC is
already idle.
v3: Don't fail on any error passed back via remaining_timeout.
v2: Fix the issue on the caller side, not the provider.
Fixes: b97060a99b ("drm/i915/guc: Update intel_gt_wait_for_idle to work with GuC")
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.15+
Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221121145655.75141-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
It was noticed that the table order verification step was only being
run once rather than once per firmware type. Fix that.
Note that the long term plan is to convert this code to be a mock
selftest. It is already only compiled in when selftests are enabled.
And the work involved in the conversion was estimated to be
non-trivial. So that conversion is currently low on the priority list.
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221122233328.854217-1-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com
Engine busyness samples around a 10ms period is failing with busyness
ranging approx. from 87% to 115% as shown below. The expected range is
+/- 5% of the sample period. Fail 10% of the time.
rcs0: reported 11716042ns [91%] busyness while spinning [for 12805719ns]
When determining busyness of active engine, the GuC based engine
busyness implementation relies on a 64 bit timestamp register read. The
latency incurred by this register read causes the failure.
On DG1, when the test fails, the observed latencies range from 900us -
1.5ms.
Optimizing the 2x32 read by acquiring the lock and forcewake prior to
all reg reads reduces the rate of failure to around 2%, but does not
eliminate it.
In order to make the selftest more robust and always account for such
latencies, increase the sample period to 100 ms. This eliminates the
issue as seen in a 1000 runs.
v2: (Ashutosh)
- Add error to commit msg
- Include gitlab bug
- Update commit for inclusion of 2x32 optimized read
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/4418
Signed-off-by: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
Acked-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221110171913.670286-3-umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com
(cherry picked from commit 529d95a606)
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
The GT MCR code currently relies on uncore->lock to avoid race
conditions on the steering control register during MCR operations. The
*_fw() versions of MCR operations expect the caller to already hold
uncore->lock, while the non-fw variants manage the lock internally.
However the sole callsite of intel_gt_mcr_wait_for_reg_fw() does not
currently obtain the forcewake lock, allowing a potential race condition
(and triggering an assertion on lockdep builds). Furthermore, since
'wait for register value' requests may not return immediately, it is
undesirable to hold a fundamental lock like uncore->lock for the entire
wait and block all other MMIO for the duration; rather the lock is only
needed around the MCR read operations and can be released during the
delays.
Convert intel_gt_mcr_wait_for_reg_fw() to a non-fw variant that will
manage uncore->lock internally. This does have the side effect of
causing an unnecessary lookup in the forcewake table on each read
operation, but since the caller is still holding the relevant forcewake
domain, this will ultimately just incremenent the reference count and
won't actually cause any additional MMIO traffic.
In the future we plan to switch to a dedicated MCR lock to protect the
steering critical section rather than using the overloaded and
high-traffic uncore->lock; on MTL and beyond the new lock can be
implemented on top of the hardware-provided synchonization mechanism for
steering.
Fixes: 3068bec83e ("drm/i915/gt: Add intel_gt_mcr_wait_for_reg_fw()")
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221117173358.1980230-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
(cherry picked from commit 192bb40f03)
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
GVT Changes:
- gvt-next stuff mostly with refactor for the new MDEV interface.
i915 Changes:
- PSR fixes and improvements (Jouni)
- DP DSC fixes (Vinod, Jouni)
- More general display cleanups (Jani)
- More display collor management cleanup targetting degamma (Ville)
- remove circ_buf.h includes (Jiri)
- wait power off delay at driver remove to optimize probe (Jani)
- More audio cleanup targeting the ELD precompute readout (Ville)
- Enable DC power states on all eDP ports (Imre)
- RPL-P stepping info (Matt Atwood)
- MTL enabling patches (RK)
- Removal of DG2 force_probe (Matt)
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/Y3f71obyEkImXoUF@intel.com
Engine busyness samples around a 10ms period is failing with busyness
ranging approx. from 87% to 115% as shown below. The expected range is
+/- 5% of the sample period. Fail 10% of the time.
rcs0: reported 11716042ns [91%] busyness while spinning [for 12805719ns]
When determining busyness of active engine, the GuC based engine
busyness implementation relies on a 64 bit timestamp register read. The
latency incurred by this register read causes the failure.
On DG1, when the test fails, the observed latencies range from 900us -
1.5ms.
Optimizing the 2x32 read by acquiring the lock and forcewake prior to
all reg reads reduces the rate of failure to around 2%, but does not
eliminate it.
In order to make the selftest more robust and always account for such
latencies, increase the sample period to 100 ms. This eliminates the
issue as seen in a 1000 runs.
v2: (Ashutosh)
- Add error to commit msg
- Include gitlab bug
- Update commit for inclusion of 2x32 optimized read
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/4418
Signed-off-by: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
Acked-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221110171913.670286-3-umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com
The GT MCR code currently relies on uncore->lock to avoid race
conditions on the steering control register during MCR operations. The
*_fw() versions of MCR operations expect the caller to already hold
uncore->lock, while the non-fw variants manage the lock internally.
However the sole callsite of intel_gt_mcr_wait_for_reg_fw() does not
currently obtain the forcewake lock, allowing a potential race condition
(and triggering an assertion on lockdep builds). Furthermore, since
'wait for register value' requests may not return immediately, it is
undesirable to hold a fundamental lock like uncore->lock for the entire
wait and block all other MMIO for the duration; rather the lock is only
needed around the MCR read operations and can be released during the
delays.
Convert intel_gt_mcr_wait_for_reg_fw() to a non-fw variant that will
manage uncore->lock internally. This does have the side effect of
causing an unnecessary lookup in the forcewake table on each read
operation, but since the caller is still holding the relevant forcewake
domain, this will ultimately just incremenent the reference count and
won't actually cause any additional MMIO traffic.
In the future we plan to switch to a dedicated MCR lock to protect the
steering critical section rather than using the overloaded and
high-traffic uncore->lock; on MTL and beyond the new lock can be
implemented on top of the hardware-provided synchonization mechanism for
steering.
Fixes: 3068bec83e ("drm/i915/gt: Add intel_gt_mcr_wait_for_reg_fw()")
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221117173358.1980230-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Add support for C6 residency and C state type for MTL SAMedia. Also add
mtl_drpc.
v2: Fixed review comments (Ashutosh)
v3: Sort registers and fix whitespace errors in intel_gt_regs.h (Matt R)
Remove MTL_CC_SHIFT (Ashutosh)
Adapt to RC6 residency register code refactor (Jani N)
v4: Move MTL branch to top in drpc_show
v5: Use FORCEWAKE_MT identical to gen6_drpc (Ashutosh)
v6: Add MISSING_CASE for gt_core_status switch statement (Rodrigo)
Change state name for MTL_CC0 to C0 (from "on") (Rodrigo)
v7: Change state name for MTL_CC0 to RC0 (Rodrigo)
Signed-off-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221114123348.3474216-6-badal.nilawar@intel.com
Previously RC6 residency functions directly accepted RC6 residency register
MMIO offsets (there are four RC6 residency registers). This worked but
required an assumption on the residency register layout so was not future
proof.
Therefore change RC6 residency functions to accept RC6 residency types
instead of register MMIO offsets. The knowledge of register offsets as well
as ID to offset mapping is now maintained solely in intel_rc6 and can be
tailored for different platforms and different register layouts as need
arises.
v2: Address review comments by Jani N
- Change residency functions to accept RC6 residency types instead of
register ID's
- s/intel_rc6_print_rc5_res/intel_rc6_print_residency/
- Remove "const enum" in function arguments
- Naming: intel_rc6_* for enum
- Use INTEL_RC6_RES_MAX and other minor changes
v3: Don't include intel_rc6_types.h in intel_rc6.h (Jani)
Suggested-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Reported-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221114123348.3474216-5-badal.nilawar@intel.com
