The use of "masked" in this function is due to its history. Once upon a
time it received a mask and a value as parameter. Since
commit eeec73f8a4 ("drm/i915/gt: Skip rmw for masked registers")
that is not true anymore and now there is a clear and a set parameter.
Depending on the case, that can still be thought as a mask and value,
but there are some subtle differences: what we clear doesn't need to be
the same bits we are setting, particularly when we are using masked
registers.
The fact that we also have "masked registers", i.e. registers whose mask
is stored in the upper 16 bits of the register, makes it even more
confusing, because "masked" in wa_write_masked_or() has little to do
with masked registers, but rather refers to the old mask parameter the
function received (that can also, but not exclusively, be used to write
to masked register).
Avoid the ambiguity and misnomer by renaming it to something else,
hopefully less confusing: wa_write_clr_set(), to designate that we are
doing both clr and set operations in the register.
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201209045246.2905675-2-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
When using masked registers, there is nothing to clear since a masked
register has the mask in the upper 16b: we can just write to the
location we want and use the mask to control what bits we are writing
to.
However that doesn't mean we don't want to read back the register and
check the value actually matched what we wanted to write, i.e. that
the WA stick. That should be an explicit opt-out for registers that are
either write-only or that are affected by hardware misbehavior.
Moreover both wa_masked_en() and wa_masked_dis() check the WA stick, so
skipping the check just because the field is more than 1 bit is
surprising and error-prone.
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201209045246.2905675-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
drm/i915 features for v5.11:
Highlights:
- Enable big joiner to join two pipes to one port to overcome pipe restrictions
(Manasi, Ville, Maarten)
Display:
- More DG1 enabling (Lucas, Aditya)
- Fixes to cases without display (Lucas, José, Jani)
- Initial PSR state improvements (José)
- JSL eDP vswing updates (Tejas)
- Handle EDID declared max 16 bpc (Ville)
- Display refactoring (Ville)
Other:
- GVT features
- Backmerge
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/87czzzkk1s.fsf@intel.com
We treat idling the GT (intel_rps_park) as a downclock event, and reduce
the frequency we intend to restart the GT with. Since the two workloads
are likely related (e.g. a compositor rendering every 16ms), we want to
carry the frequency and load information from across the idling.
However, we do also need to update the frequencies so that workloads
that run for less than 1ms are autotuned by RPS (otherwise we leave
compositors running at max clocks, draining excess power). Conversely,
if we try to run too slowly, the next workload has to run longer. Since
there is a hysteresis in the power graph, below a certain frequency
running a short workload for longer consumes more energy than running it
slightly higher for less time. The exact balance point is unknown
beforehand, but measurements with 30fps media playback indicate that RPe
is a better choice.
Reported-by: Edward Baker <edward.baker@intel.com>
Tested-by: Edward Baker <edward.baker@intel.com>
Fixes: 043cd2d14e ("drm/i915/gt: Leave rps->cur_freq on unpark")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Edward Baker <edward.baker@intel.com>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.8+
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201124183521.28623-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit f7ed83cc19)
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Allow a brief period for continued access to a dead intel_context by
deferring the release of the struct until after an RCU grace period.
As we are using a dedicated slab cache for the contexts, we can defer
the release of the slab pages via RCU, with the caveat that individual
structs may be reused from the freelist within an RCU grace period. To
handle that, we have to avoid clearing members of the zombie struct.
This is required for a later patch to handle locking around virtual
requests in the signaler, as those requests may want to move between
engines and be destroyed while we are holding b->irq_lock on a physical
engine.
v2: Drop mutex_reinit(), if we never mark the mutex as destroyed we
don't need to reset the debug code, at the loss of having the mutex
debug code spot us attempting to destroy a locked mutex.
v3: As the intended use will remain strongly referenced counted, with
very little inflight access across reuse, drop the ctor.
v4: Drop the unrequired change to remove the temporary reference around
dropping the active context, and add back some more missing ctor
operations.
v5: The ctor is back. Tvrtko spotted that ce->signal_lock [introduced
later] maybe accessed under RCU and so needs special care not to be
reinitialised.
v6: Don't mix SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU and RCU list iteration.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201126140407.31952-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit 14d1eaf088)
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
We treat idling the GT (intel_rps_park) as a downclock event, and reduce
the frequency we intend to restart the GT with. Since the two workloads
are likely related (e.g. a compositor rendering every 16ms), we want to
carry the frequency and load information from across the idling.
However, we do also need to update the frequencies so that workloads
that run for less than 1ms are autotuned by RPS (otherwise we leave
compositors running at max clocks, draining excess power). Conversely,
if we try to run too slowly, the next workload has to run longer. Since
there is a hysteresis in the power graph, below a certain frequency
running a short workload for longer consumes more energy than running it
slightly higher for less time. The exact balance point is unknown
beforehand, but measurements with 30fps media playback indicate that RPe
is a better choice.
Reported-by: Edward Baker <edward.baker@intel.com>
Tested-by: Edward Baker <edward.baker@intel.com>
Fixes: 043cd2d14e ("drm/i915/gt: Leave rps->cur_freq on unpark")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Edward Baker <edward.baker@intel.com>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.8+
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201124183521.28623-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Allow a brief period for continued access to a dead intel_context by
deferring the release of the struct until after an RCU grace period.
As we are using a dedicated slab cache for the contexts, we can defer
the release of the slab pages via RCU, with the caveat that individual
structs may be reused from the freelist within an RCU grace period. To
handle that, we have to avoid clearing members of the zombie struct.
This is required for a later patch to handle locking around virtual
requests in the signaler, as those requests may want to move between
engines and be destroyed while we are holding b->irq_lock on a physical
engine.
v2: Drop mutex_reinit(), if we never mark the mutex as destroyed we
don't need to reset the debug code, at the loss of having the mutex
debug code spot us attempting to destroy a locked mutex.
v3: As the intended use will remain strongly referenced counted, with
very little inflight access across reuse, drop the ctor.
v4: Drop the unrequired change to remove the temporary reference around
dropping the active context, and add back some more missing ctor
operations.
v5: The ctor is back. Tvrtko spotted that ce->signal_lock [introduced
later] maybe accessed under RCU and so needs special care not to be
reinitialised.
v6: Don't mix SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU and RCU list iteration.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201126140407.31952-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Pull the repeated check for the last active request being completed to a
single spot, when deciding whether or not execlist preemption is
required.
In doing so, we remove the tasklet kick, introduced with the completion
checks in commit 35f3fd8182 ("drm/i915/execlists: Workaround switching
back to a completed context"), if we find the request was completed but
have not yet seen the corresponding CS event. This was devolving into a
busy spin of the tasklet while we waited for the event as the delivery
was not as instantaneous as expected. Under load this is sufficient to
exhaust the tasklet softirq timeslice, and force ksoftirqd. Quite
noticeable overhead for no apparent improvement in latency.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201126140407.31952-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Since the introduction of preempt-to-busy, requests can complete in the
background, even while they are not on the engine->active.requests list.
As such, the engine->active.request list itself is not in strict
retirement order, and we have to scan the entire list while unwinding to
not miss any. However, if the request is completed we currently leave it
on the list [until retirement], but we could just as simply remove it
and stop treating it as active. We would only have to then traverse it
once while unwinding in quick succession.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201126140407.31952-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Since preempt-to-busy, we may unsubmit a request while it is still on
the HW and completes asynchronously. That means it may be retired and in
the process destroy the virtual engine (as the user has closed their
context), but that engine may still be holding onto the unsubmitted
compelted request. Therefore we need to potentially cleanup the old
request on destroying the virtual engine. We also have to keep the
virtual_engine alive until after the sibling's execlists_dequeue() have
finished peeking into the virtual engines, for which we serialise with
RCU.
v2: Be paranoid and flush the tasklet as well.
v3: And flush the tasklet before the engines, as the tasklet may
re-attach an rb_node after our removal from the siblings.
Fixes: 6d06779e86 ("drm/i915: Load balancing across a virtual engine")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201123113717.20500-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit 46eecfccb4)
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Move the register slow register write and readback from out of the
critical path for execlists submission and delay it until the following
worker, shaving off around 200us. Note that the same signal_irq_work() is
allowed to run concurrently on each CPU (but it will only be queued once,
once running though it can be requeued and reexecuted) so we have to
remember to lock the global interactions as we cannot rely on the
signal_irq_work() itself providing the serialisation (in constrast to a
tasklet).
By pushing the arm/disarm into the central signaling worker we can close
the race for disarming the interrupt (and dropping its associated
GT wakeref) on parking the engine. If we loose the race, that GT wakeref
may be held indefinitely, preventing the machine from sleeping while
the GPU is ostensibly idle.
v2: Move the self-arming parking of the signal_irq_work to a flush of
the irq-work from intel_breadcrumbs_park().
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/2271
Fixes: e23005604b ("drm/i915/gt: Hold context/request reference while breadcrumbs are active")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201123113717.20500-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit 9d5612ca16)
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Since preempt-to-busy, we may unsubmit a request while it is still on
the HW and completes asynchronously. That means it may be retired and in
the process destroy the virtual engine (as the user has closed their
context), but that engine may still be holding onto the unsubmitted
compelted request. Therefore we need to potentially cleanup the old
request on destroying the virtual engine. We also have to keep the
virtual_engine alive until after the sibling's execlists_dequeue() have
finished peeking into the virtual engines, for which we serialise with
RCU.
v2: Be paranoid and flush the tasklet as well.
v3: And flush the tasklet before the engines, as the tasklet may
re-attach an rb_node after our removal from the siblings.
Fixes: 6d06779e86 ("drm/i915: Load balancing across a virtual engine")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201123113717.20500-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Move the register slow register write and readback from out of the
critical path for execlists submission and delay it until the following
worker, shaving off around 200us. Note that the same signal_irq_work() is
allowed to run concurrently on each CPU (but it will only be queued once,
once running though it can be requeued and reexecuted) so we have to
remember to lock the global interactions as we cannot rely on the
signal_irq_work() itself providing the serialisation (in constrast to a
tasklet).
By pushing the arm/disarm into the central signaling worker we can close
the race for disarming the interrupt (and dropping its associated
GT wakeref) on parking the engine. If we loose the race, that GT wakeref
may be held indefinitely, preventing the machine from sleeping while
the GPU is ostensibly idle.
v2: Move the self-arming parking of the signal_irq_work to a flush of
the irq-work from intel_breadcrumbs_park().
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/2271
Fixes: e23005604b ("drm/i915/gt: Hold context/request reference while breadcrumbs are active")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201123113717.20500-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
We plan to expand upon the number of available statuses for when we
pretty-print the requests along the timelines, and so need a new set of
flags. We have settled upon:
Unready [U]
- initial status after being submitted, the request is not
ready for execution as it is waiting for external fences
Ready [R]
- all fences the request was waiting on have been signaled,
and the request is now ready for execution and will be
in a backend queue
- a ready request may still need to wait on semaphores
[internal fences]
Ready/virtual [V]
- same as ready, but queued over multiple backends
Executing [E]
- the request has been transferred from the backend queue and
submitted for execution on HW
- a completed request may still be regarded as executing, its
status may not be updated until it is retired and removed
from the lists
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201119165616.10834-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
