On ICP-ADP the pins used by the second PPS can be alternatively
muxed to some other function. In that case the second power
sequencer is unusable.
Unfortunately (on my ADL Thinkpad T14 gen3 at least) the
BIOS still likes to enable the VDD on the second PPS (due
to the VBT declaring the second bogus eDP panel) even when
not correctly muxed, so we need to deal with it somehow.
For now let's just initialize the PPS as normal, and then
use the normal eDP probe failure VDD off path to turn it off
(and release the wakeref the PPS init grabbed). The
alternative of just declaring that the platform has a single
PPS doesn't really work since it would cause the second eDP
probe to also try to use the first PPS and thus clobber the
state for the first (real) eDP panel.
Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221125173156.31689-7-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Currently on bxt/glk we just grab the power sequencer index from
the VBT data even though it may not have been parsed yet. That
could lead us to using the incorrect power sequencer during the
initial panel probe.
To avoid that let's try to read out the current state of the
power sequencer from the hardware. Unfortunately the power
sequencer no longer has anything in its registers to associate
it with the port, so the best we can do is just iterate through
the power sequencers and pick the first one. This should be
sufficient for single panel cases.
For the dual panel cases we probably need to go back to
parsing the VBT before the panel probe (and hope that
panel_type=0xff is never a thing in those cases). To that
end the code always prefers the VBT panel sequencer, if
available.
v2: Restructure a bit for upcoming icp+ dual PPS support
Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221125173156.31689-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Lots of ADL machines out there with bogus VBTs that declare
two eDP child devices. In order for those to work we need to
figure out which power sequencer to use before we try the EDID
read. So let's do the panel VBT init early if we can, falling
back to the post-EDID init otherwise.
The post-EDID init panel_type=0xff approach of assuming the
power sequencer should already be enabled doesn't really work
with multiple eDP panels, and currently we just end up using
the same power sequencer for both eDP ports, which at least
confuses the wakeref tracking, and potentially also causes us
to toggle the VDD for the panel when we should not.
Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221125173156.31689-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Starting with MTL, there will be two GT-tiles, a render and media
tile. PXP as a service for supporting workloads with protected
contexts and protected buffers can be subscribed by process
workloads on any tile. However, depending on the platform,
only one of the tiles is used for control events pertaining to PXP
operation (such as creating the arbitration session and session
tear-down).
PXP as a global feature is accessible via batch buffer instructions
on any engine/tile and the coherency across tiles is handled implicitly
by the HW. In fact, for the foreseeable future, we are expecting this
single-control-tile for the PXP subsystem.
In MTL, it's the standalone media tile (not the root tile) because
it contains the VDBOX and KCR engine (among the assets PXP relies on
for those events).
Looking at the current code design, each tile is represented by the
intel_gt structure while the intel_pxp structure currently hangs off the
intel_gt structure.
Keeping the intel_pxp structure within the intel_gt structure makes some
internal functionalities more straight forward but adds code complexity to
code readability and maintainibility to many external-to-pxp subsystems
which may need to pick the correct intel_gt structure. An example of this
would be the intel_pxp_is_active or intel_pxp_is_enabled functionality
which should be viewed as a global level inquiry, not a per-gt inquiry.
That said, this series promotes the intel_pxp structure into the
drm_i915_private structure making it a top-level subsystem and the PXP
subsystem will select the control gt internally and keep a pointer to
it for internal reference.
This promotion comes with two noteworthy changes:
1. Exported pxp functions that are called by external subsystems
(such as intel_pxp_enabled/active) will have to check implicitly
if i915->pxp is valid as that structure will not be allocated
for HW that doesn't support PXP.
2. Since GT is now considered a soft-dependency of PXP we are
ensuring that GT init happens before PXP init and vice versa
for fini. This causes a minor ordering change whereby we previously
called intel_pxp_suspend after intel_uc_suspend but now is before
i915_gem_suspend_late but the change is required for correct
dependency flows. Additionally, this re-order change doesn't
have any impact because at that point in either case, the top level
entry to i915 won't observe any PXP events (since the GPU was
quiesced during suspend_prepare). Also, any PXP event doesn't
really matter when we disable the PXP HW (global GT irqs are
already off anyway, so even if there was a bug that generated
spurious events we wouldn't see it and we would just clean it
up on resume which is okay since the default fallback action
for PXP would be to keep the sessions off at this suspend stage).
Changes from prior revs:
v11: - Reformat a comment (Tvrtko).
v10: - Change the code flow for intel_pxp_init to make it more
cleaner and readible with better comments explaining the
difference between full-PXP-feature vs the partial-teelink
inits depending on the platform. Additionally, only do
the pxp allocation when we are certain the subsystem is
needed. (Tvrtko).
v9: - Cosmetic cleanups in supported/enabled/active. (Daniele).
- Add comments for intel_pxp_init and pxp_get_ctrl_gt that
explain the functional flow for when PXP is not supported
but the backend-assets are needed for HuC authentication
(Daniele and Tvrtko).
- Fix two remaining functions that are accessible outside
PXP that need to be checking pxp ptrs before using them:
intel_pxp_irq_handler and intel_pxp_huc_load_and_auth
(Tvrtko and Daniele).
- User helper macro in pxp-debugfs (Tvrtko).
v8: - Remove pxp_to_gt macro (Daniele).
- Fix a bug in pxp_get_ctrl_gt for the case of MTL and we don't
support GSC-FW on it. (Daniele).
- Leave i915->pxp as NULL if we dont support PXP and in line
with that, do additional validity check on i915->pxp for
intel_pxp_is_supported/enabled/active (Daniele).
- Remove unncessary include header from intel_gt_debugfs.c
and check drm_minor i915->drm.primary (Daniele).
- Other cosmetics / minor issues / more comments on suspend
flow order change (Daniele).
v7: - Drop i915_dev_to_pxp and in intel_pxp_init use 'i915->pxp'
through out instead of local variable newpxp. (Rodrigo)
- In the case intel_pxp_fini is called during driver unload but
after i915 loading failed without pxp being allocated, check
i915->pxp before referencing it. (Alan)
v6: - Remove HAS_PXP macro and replace it with intel_pxp_is_supported
because : [1] introduction of 'ctrl_gt' means we correct this
for MTL's upcoming series now. [2] Also, this has little impact
globally as its only used by PXP-internal callers at the moment.
- Change intel_pxp_init/fini to take in i915 as its input to avoid
ptr-to-ptr in init/fini calls.(Jani).
- Remove the backpointer from pxp->i915 since we can use
pxp->ctrl_gt->i915 if we need it. (Rodrigo).
v5: - Switch from series to single patch (Rodrigo).
- change function name from pxp_get_kcr_owner_gt to
pxp_get_ctrl_gt.
- Fix CI BAT failure by removing redundant call to intel_pxp_fini
from driver-remove.
- NOTE: remaining open still persists on using ptr-to-ptr
and back-ptr.
v4: - Instead of maintaining intel_pxp as an intel_gt structure member
and creating a number of convoluted helpers that takes in i915 as
input and redirects to the correct intel_gt or takes any intel_gt
and internally replaces with the correct intel_gt, promote it to
be a top-level i915 structure.
v3: - Rename gt level helper functions to "intel_pxp_is_enabled/
supported/ active_on_gt" (Daniele)
- Upgrade _gt_supports_pxp to replace what was intel_gtpxp_is
supported as the new intel_pxp_is_supported_on_gt to check for
PXP feature support vs the tee support for huc authentication.
Fix pxp-debugfs-registration to use only the former to decide
support. (Daniele)
- Couple minor optimizations.
v2: - Avoid introduction of new device info or gt variables and use
existing checks / macros to differentiate the correct GT->PXP
control ownership (Daniele Ceraolo Spurio)
- Don't reuse the updated global-checkers for per-GT callers (such
as other files within PXP) to avoid unnecessary GT-reparsing,
expose a replacement helper like the prior ones. (Daniele).
v1: - Add one more patch to the series for the intel_pxp suspend/resume
for similar refactoring
References: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221202011407.4068371-1-alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Acked-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221208180542.998148-1-alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com
If the GSC was loaded, the only way to stop it during the driver unload
flow is to do a driver-FLR.
The driver-initiated FLR is not the same as PCI config space FLR in
that it doesn't reset the SGUnit and doesn't modify the PCI config
space. Thus, it doesn't require a re-enumeration of the PCI BARs.
However, the driver-FLR does cause a memory wipe of graphics memory
on all discrete GPU platforms or a wipe limited to stolen memory
on the integrated GPU platforms.
We perform the FLR as the last action before releasing the MMIO bar, so
that we don't have to care about the consequences of the reset on the
unload flow.
v2: rename FLR function, add comment to explain FLR impact (Rodrigo),
better explain why GSC needs FLR (Alan)
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221208200521.2928378-5-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
On mtl (at least) clearing the guardband bits in the same write
as the enable bit gets cleared seems to cause an immediate FIFO
underrun. Thus is seems that we need to first clear just the
enable bit, then wait for the VRR live status to indicate the
transcoder has exited VRR mode (this step is documented in Bspec
as well), and finally we can clear out the rest of the TRANS_VRR_CTL
for good measure.
I did this without any RMWs in case we want to toggle VRR on/off
via DSB in the future, and as we know DSB can't read registers.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221202134412.21943-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
On mtl it looks like disabling VRR after the transcoder has
been disabled can cause the pipe/transcoder to get stuck
when re-enabled in non-vrr mode. Reversing the order seems to
help.
Bspec is extremely confused about the VRR enable/disable sequence
anyway, and this now more closely matches the non-modeset VRR
sequence, whereas the full modeset sequence still claims that
the original order is fine. But since we eventually want to toggle
VRR without a full modeset anyway this seems like the better order
to follow.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221202134412.21943-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
We are miscalculating both the guardband value, and the resulting
vblank exit length on adl+. This means that our start of vblank
(double buffered register latch point) is incorrect, and we also
think that it's not where it actually is (hence vblank evasion/etc.
may not work properly). Fix up the calculations to match the real
hardware behaviour (as reverse engineered by intel_display_poller).
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221202134412.21943-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Account for the framestart delay when calculating the "pipeline full"
value for icl/tgl vrr. This puts the start of vblank (ie. where the
double bufferd registers get latched) to a consistent place regardless
of what framestart delay value is used. framestart delay does not
change where start of vblank occurs in non-vrr mode and I can't see
any reason why we'd want different behaviour in vrr mode.
Currently framestart delay is always set to 1, and the hardcoded 4
scanlines in the code means we're currently delaying the start of
vblank by three extra lines. And with framestart delay set to 4 we'd
have no extra delay.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221202134412.21943-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
hwm_pcode_read_i1 is called during i915 load. This results in the following
warning from snb_pcode_read because POWER_SETUP_SUBCOMMAND_READ_I1 is
unsupported on DG1/DG2.
[drm:snb_pcode_read [i915]] warning: pcode (read from mbox 47c) \
mailbox access failed for snb_pcode_read_p [i915]: -6
The code handles the unsupported command but the warning in dmesg is
a red herring which has resulted in a couple of bugs being filed.
Therefore silence the warning by avoiding calling snb_pcode_read_p
for DG1/DG2.
Signed-off-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221203031454.1280538-1-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com
VT-d may cause overfetch of the scanout PTE, both before and after the
vma (depending on the scanout orientation). bspec recommends that we
provide a tile-row in either directions, and suggests using 168 PTE,
warning that the accesses will wrap around the ends of the GGTT.
Currently, we fill the entire GGTT with scratch pages when using VT-d to
always ensure there are valid entries around every vma, including
scanout. However, writing every PTE is slow as on recent devices we
perform 8MiB of uncached writes, incurring an extra 100ms during resume.
If instead we focus on only putting guard pages around scanout, we can
avoid touching the whole GGTT. To avoid having to introduce extra nodes
around each scanout vma, we adjust the scanout drm_mm_node to be smaller
than the allocated space, and fixup the extra PTE during dma binding.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Tejas Upadhyay <tejaskumarx.surendrakumar.upadhyay@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221130235805.221010-5-andi.shyti@linux.intel.com
