Let's just do a full DRRS disable/enable across all pipe updates.
This guarantees that the DRRS work doesn't interfere with anything
while the atomic commit is busy reprogramming the pipe.
Needed so that we can start reprogramming M/N seamlessly during
fastsets whenever possible. Also avoids the pre-bdw DRRS PIPECONF
rmw racing with the potential PIPECONF write from the atomic
commit (eg. due to GAMMA_MODE changes).
v2: Include has_drrs in state dump (José)
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220315213944.17132-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
With static DRRS the user might ask for the lowest possible refresh
rate of the panel, in which case we're not going to find a suitable
downclock mode for it and we should not try to enable seamless DRRS.
This will in fact oops.
We used to check for the presence of the downclock mode here, but
that got removed in commit f0a57798fb ("drm/i915: Introduce
intel_panel_drrs_type()") as redundant (which it was at the time).
But we do need the check again now that static DRRS is a thing.
I must have not re-tested static DRRS fully after introducing
intel_panel_drrs_type() :/
Fixes: c5ee23437c ("drm/i915: Implement static DRRS")
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220315132752.11849-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
struct drm_display_mode embeds a list head, so overwriting
the full struct with another one will corrupt the list
(if the destination mode is on a list). Use drm_mode_copy()
instead which explicitly preserves the list head of
the destination mode.
Even if we know the destination mode is not on any list
using drm_mode_copy() seems decent as it sets a good
example. Bad examples of not using it might eventually
get copied into code where preserving the list head
actually matters.
Obviously one case not covered here is when the mode
itself is embedded in a larger structure and the whole
structure is copied. But if we are careful when copying
into modes embedded in structures I think we can be a
little more reassured that bogus list heads haven't been
propagated in.
@is_mode_copy@
@@
drm_mode_copy(...)
{
...
}
@depends on !is_mode_copy@
struct drm_display_mode *mode;
expression E, S;
@@
(
- *mode = E
+ drm_mode_copy(mode, &E)
|
- memcpy(mode, E, S)
+ drm_mode_copy(mode, E)
)
@depends on !is_mode_copy@
struct drm_display_mode mode;
expression E;
@@
(
- mode = E
+ drm_mode_copy(&mode, &E)
|
- memcpy(&mode, E, S)
+ drm_mode_copy(&mode, E)
)
@@
struct drm_display_mode *mode;
@@
- &*mode
+ mode
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220218100403.7028-20-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Commit 13ea6db2cf ("drm/i915/edp: Ignore short pulse when panel
powered off") completely broke short pulse handling for eDP as it is
usually generated by sink when it is displaying image and there is
some error or status that source needs to handle.
When power panel is enabled, this state is enough to power aux
transactions and VDD override is disabled, so intel_pps_have_power()
is always returning false causing short pulses to be ignored.
So here better naming this function that intends to check if aux
lines are powered to avoid the endless cycle mentioned in the commit
being fixed and fixing the check for what it is intended.
v2:
- renamed to intel_pps_have_panel_power_or_vdd()
- fixed indentation
Fixes: 13ea6db2cf ("drm/i915/edp: Ignore short pulse when panel powered off")
Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220311185149.110527-1-jose.souza@intel.com
(cherry picked from commit 8f0c1c0949)
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
GuC has its own steering mechanism and can't use the default set by i915,
so we need to provide the steering information that the FW will need to
save/restore registers while processing an engine reset. The GUC
interface allows us to do so as part of the register save/restore list
and it requires us to specify the steering for all multicast register, even
those that would be covered by the default setting for cpu access. Given
that we do not distinguish between registers that do not need steering and
registers that are guaranteed to work the default steering, we set the
steering for all entries in the guc list that do not require a special
steering (e.g. mslice) to the default settings; this will cost us a few
extra writes during engine reset but allows us to keep the steering
logic simple.
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220314234203.799268-3-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Add a new 'steering' node in each gt's debugfs directory that tells
whether we're using explicit steering for various types of MCR ranges
and, if so, what MMIO ranges it applies to.
We're going to be transitioning away from implicit steering, even for
slice/dss steering soon, so the information reported here will become
increasingly valuable once that happens.
v2:
- Adding missing 'static' on intel_steering_types[] (Jose, sparse)
v3:
- "static const char *" -> "static const char * const" (sparse)
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220315170250.954380-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Commit 13ea6db2cf ("drm/i915/edp: Ignore short pulse when panel
powered off") completely broke short pulse handling for eDP as it is
usually generated by sink when it is displaying image and there is
some error or status that source needs to handle.
When power panel is enabled, this state is enough to power aux
transactions and VDD override is disabled, so intel_pps_have_power()
is always returning false causing short pulses to be ignored.
So here better naming this function that intends to check if aux
lines are powered to avoid the endless cycle mentioned in the commit
being fixed and fixing the check for what it is intended.
v2:
- renamed to intel_pps_have_panel_power_or_vdd()
- fixed indentation
Fixes: 13ea6db2cf ("drm/i915/edp: Ignore short pulse when panel powered off")
Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220311185149.110527-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Let's start supporting static DRRS by trying to match the refresh
rate the user has requested, assuming the panel supports suitable
timings.
For now we stick to just our current two timings:
- fixed_mode: the panel's preferred mode
- downclock_mode: the lowest refresh rate mode we found
Some panels may support more timings than that, but we'll
have to convert our fixed_mode/downclock_mode pointers
into a full list before we can handle that.
v2: Rebase due to intel_panel_get_modes()
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> #v1
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220311172428.14685-16-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Abstract away the details on where we store the fixed/downclock
modes, and also how we select them. Will be useful for static
DRRS (aka. allowing the user to select the refresh rate for the
panel).
We pass in the user requested mode to intel_panel_fixed_mode()
so that in the future it may try to match the refresh rate.
And intel_panel_downclock_mode() gets passed the adjusted_mode
we actually chose to use so that it may find a suitable lower
resresh rate variant.
v2: Hook it up for all encoders
s/fixed_mode/adjusted_mode/ in intel_panel_downclock_mode() (Jani)
Elaborate on the choice or arguments for the functions (Jani)
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220311172428.14685-7-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
When running on Xe_HP or beyond, let's use an updated format for
describing topology in our error state dumps and debugfs to give a
more accurate view of the hardware:
- Just report DSS directly without the legacy "slice0" output that's no
longer meaningful.
- Indicate whether each DSS is accessible for geometry and/or compute.
- Rename "rcs_topology" to "sseu_topology" since the information
reported is common to both RCS and CCS engines now.
v2:
- Name static functions in a more consistent manner. (Lucas)
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220311225459.385515-2-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Xe_HP removed "slice" as a first-class unit in the hardware design.
Instead we now have a single pool of subslices (which are now referred
to as "DSS") that different hardware units have different ways of
grouping ("compute slices," "geometry slices," etc.). For the purposes
of topology representation, we treat Xe_HP-based platforms as having a
single slice that contains all of the platform's DSS. There's no need
to allocate storage space for (max legacy slices * max dss); let's
update some of our macros to minimize the storage requirement for sseu
topology. We'll also document some of the constants to make it a little
bit more clear what they represent.
v2:
- s/LEGACY/HSW/ in macro names. (Lucas)
- Rename MAX() to SSEU_MAX() to avoid any potential clashes with other
definitions elsewhere. Unfortunately max()/max_t() from
linux/minmax.h cannot be used in this context. (Lucas)
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220311225459.385515-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
As a preparation for moving to -std=gnu11, turn off the
-Wshift-negative-value option. This warning is enabled by gcc when
building with -Wextra for c99 or higher, but not for c89. Since
the kernel already relies on well-defined overflow behavior,
the warning is not helpful and can simply be disabled in
all locations that use -Wextra.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> # LLVM/Clang v13.0.0 (x86-64)
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
We shouldn't really be keeping track of how many SFC_DONE registers
our platforms can have, but rather how many SFC hardware units there can
be (each SFC unit will have one corresponding SFC_DONE register). So
drop the stray GEN12_SFC_DONE_MAX definition we had in the register
definition file and replace it with an I915_MAX_SFC that follows the
pattern we use for other hardware units. Note that our hardware has a
2:1:1 ratio of VD:VE:SFC, and as far as we know that pattern should
carry forward to future platforms, so we'll define it as #VCS/2.
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220311062835.163744-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
