We weren't sending the high bits, though they're zero currently anyway.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
NVIDIA provided this on Turing, but we kept using the hardcoded version
from Volta (where they didn't).
Switch to the firmware version prior to Ampere.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Essentially ripped verbatim from NVGPU, comments and all, and adapted to
nvkm's structs and style.
- maybe fixes an nvgpu bug though, a small tweak was needed to match RM
v2:
- remove unnecessary WARN_ON
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
We'll want to reuse the former for loading from proper netlist images.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
This won't work on Ampere, and, it's questionable whether we should have
been using our FW's method of storing the golden context image with NV's
firmware to begin with.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
This was thought to be per-channel initially - it's not. The backing
pages for the VMM mappings are shared for all channels.
- switches to more straight-forward patch interfaces
- prepares for sub-context support
- this is saving a *sizeable* amount of vram
v2:
- whitespace
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
This was thought to be per-channel initially - it's not. The backing
pages for the VMM mappings are shared for all channels.
- switches to more straight-forward patch interfaces
- prepares for sub-context support
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
This was thought to be per-channel initially - it's not. The backing
pages for the VMM mappings are shared for all channels.
- switches to more straight-forward patch interfaces
- prepares for sub-context support
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
gp10b doesn't have all the registers that gp102_gr_zbc wants to access,
which causes IBUS MMIO faults to occur. Avoid this by using the gp100
variants of grctx and gr_zbc.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
ACR is responsible for managing the firmware for LS (Low Secure) falcons,
this was previously handled in the driver by SECBOOT.
This rewrite started from some test code that attempted to replicate the
procedure RM uses in order to debug early Turing ACR firmwares that were
provided by NVIDIA for development.
Compared with SECBOOT, the code is structured into more individual steps,
with the aim of making the process easier to follow/debug, whilst making
it possible to support newer firmware versions that may have a different
binary format or API interface.
The HS (High Secure) binary(s) are now booted earlier in device init, to
match the behaviour of RM, whereas SECBOOT would delay this until we try
to boot the first LS falcon.
There's also additional debugging features available, with the intention
of making it easier to solve issues during FW/HW bring-up in the future.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
This will allow us to register the falcon with ACR, and further customise
its behaviour by providing the nvkm_falcon_func structure directly.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
ACR LS FW loading is moving out of SECBOOT and into their specific subdevs,
and the available GP107/GP108 FWs have interface differences.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
These were missed the first time around due to the driver version I traced
using the older registers still.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
There are differences on GM200 and newer too, but we can't fix them there
as they come from firmware packages.
A request has been made to NVIDIA to release updated firmware.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
There's a number of places that require this data, so let's separate out
the calculations to ensure they remain consistent.
This is incorrect for GM200 and newer, but will produce the same results
as we did before.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
There's also a couple of hardcoded tables for a couple of very specific
configurations that NVGPU's algorithm didn't work for.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
The algorithm for GM200 and newer matches RM for all the boards I have, but
I don't have enough data to try and figure something out for earlier boards,
so these will still write zeroes to the table as we did before.
The code in NVGPU isn't helpful here, it appears to handle specific cases.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
I haven't yet been able to find a fully programatic way of calculating the
same mapping as NVIDIA for GF100-GF119, so the algorithm partially depends
on data tables for specific configurations.
I couldn't find traces for every possibility, so the algorithm will switch
to a mapping similar to what GK104-GM10x use if it encounters one. We did
the wrong thing before anyway, so shouldn't matter too much.
The algorithm used in the GK104 implementation was ported from NVGPU.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
