Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Ville Syrjälä
a815362752 drm/i915: Try to relocate the BIOS fb to the start of ggtt
On MTL the GOP (for whatever reason) likes to bind its framebuffer
high up in the ggtt address space. This can conflict with whatever
ggtt_reserve_guc_top() is trying to do, and the result is that
ggtt_reserve_guc_top() fails and then we proceed to explode when
trying to tear down the driver. Thus far I haven't analyzed what
causes the actual fireworks, but it's not super important as even
if it didn't explode we'd still fail the driver load and the user
would be left with an unusable GPU.

To remedy this (without having to figure out exactly what
ggtt_reserve_guc_top() is trying to achieve) we can attempt to
relocate the BIOS framebuffer to a lower ggtt address. We can do
this at this early point in driver init because nothing else is
supposed to be clobbering the ggtt yet. So we simply change where
in the ggtt we pin the vma, the original PTEs will be left as is,
and the new PTEs will get written with the same dma addresses.
The plane will keep on scanning out from the original PTEs until
we are done with the whole process, and at that point we rewrite
the plane's surface address register to point at the new ggtt
address.

Since we don't need a specific ggtt address for the plane
(apart from needing it to land in the mappable region for
normal stolen objects) we'll just try to pin it without a fixed
offset first. It should end up at the lowest available address
(which really should be 0 at this point in the driver init).
If that fails we'll fall back to just pinning it exactly to the
origianal address.

To make sure we don't accidentlally pin it partially over the
original ggtt range (as that would corrupt the original PTEs)
we reserve the original range temporarily during this process.

v2: Try to pin explicitly to ggtt offset 0 as otherwise DG2 puts it
    even higher (atm we have no PIN_LOW flag to force it low)
v3: "fix" xe

Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
Tested-by: Paz Zcharya <pazz@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240202224340.30647-16-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Acked-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
2024-02-07 02:01:49 +02:00
Ville Syrjälä
ea5e150ac2 drm/i915: Tweak BIOS fb reuse check
Currently we assume that we bind the BIOS fb exactly into the same
ggtt address where the BIOS left it. That is about to change, and
in order to keep intel_reuse_initial_plane_obj() working as intended
we need to compare the original ggtt offset (called 'base' here)
as opposed to the actual vma ggtt offset we selected. Otherwise
the first plane could change the ggtt offset, and then subsequent
planes would no longer notice that they are in fact using the same
ggtt offset that the first plane was already using. Thus the reuse
check will fail and we proceed to turn off these subsequent planes.

TODO: would probably make more sense to do the pure readout first
for all the planes, then check for fb reuse, and only then proceed
to pin the object into the final location in the ggtt...

v2: "fix" xe

Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
Tested-by: Paz Zcharya <pazz@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240202224340.30647-15-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Acked-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
2024-02-07 02:01:44 +02:00
Ville Syrjälä
30865e4abb drm/i915: Simplify intel_initial_plane_config() calling convention
There's no reason the caller of intel_initial_plane_config() should
have to loop over the CRTCs. Pull the loop into the function to
make life simpler for the caller.

v2: "fix" xe

Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
Tested-by: Paz Zcharya <pazz@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240202224340.30647-13-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Acked-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
2024-02-07 02:01:36 +02:00
Maarten Lankhorst
44e694958b drm/xe/display: Implement display support
As for display, the intent is to share the display code with the i915
driver so that there is maximum reuse there.

We do this by recompiling i915/display code twice.
Now that i915 has been adapted to support the Xe build, we can add
the xe/display support.

This initial work is a collaboration of many people and unfortunately
this squashed patch won't fully honor the proper credits.
But let's try to add a few from the squashed patches:

Co-developed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
Co-developed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
2023-12-21 11:43:39 -05:00