Rather than using the passed in GT, use the BO's GT determine dma_offset
when programming PTEs as these two GT's could differ (i.e. mapping a BO
from a remote GT). The BO's GT is correct GT to use as this where BO
resides, while the passed in GT is where the mapping is created.
v2:
(Thomas) - Kernel doc, extra new line
(CI) - Rebase to tip
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Sort includes and split them in blocks:
1) .h corresponding to the .c. Example: xe_bb.c should have a "#include
"xe_bb.h" first.
2) #include <linux/...>
3) #include <drm/...>
4) local includes
5) i915 includes
This is accomplished by running
`clang-format --style=file -i --sort-includes drivers/gpu/drm/xe/*.[ch]`
and ignoring all the changes after the includes. There are also some
manual tweaks to split the blocks.
v2: Also sort includes in headers
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
If we add an TLB invalidation fence for rebinds issued from execs we
should be able to drop the TLB invalidation from the ring operations.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
Only the GuC should be issuing TLB invalidations if it is enabled. Part
of this patch is sanitize the device on driver unload to ensure we do
not send GuC based TLB invalidations during driver unload.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
This gets tricky as we can't do the TLB invalidation until the unbind
operation is done on the hardware and we can't signal the unbind as
complete until the TLB invalidation is done. To work around this we
create an unbind fence which does a TLB invalidation after unbind is
done on the hardware, signals on TLB invalidation completion, and this
fence is installed in the BO dma-resv slot and installed in out-syncs
for the unbind operation.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com
Suggested-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
On DG2 when running the xe_vm IGT, the kernel generates loads of CAT
errors and GT resets (sometimes at least). On small-bar systems seems
to trigger a lot more easily (maybe due to difference in allocation
strategy). Appears to be related to scratch, since we seem to use the
64K TLB hint on scratch entries, even though the scratch page is a 4K
vram page. Bumping the scratch page size and physical alignment seems
to fix it. Or at least we no longer hit:
[ 148.872683] xe 0000:03:00.0: [drm] Engine memory cat error: guc_id=0
[ 148.872701] xe 0000:03:00.0: [drm] Engine memory cat error: guc_id=0
[ 148.875108] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 953 at drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c:797
However to keep things simple, so we don't have to deal with 64K TLB
hints, just move the scratch page into system memory on platforms that
require 64K VRAM pages.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
This adds support for stolen memory, with the same allocator as
vram_mgr. This allows us to skip a whole lot of copy-paste,
by re-using parts of xe_ttm_vram_mgr.
The stolen memory may be bound using VM_BIND, so it performs like any
other memory region.
We should be able to map a stolen BO directly using the physical memory
location instead of through GGTT even on old platforms, but I don't know
what the effects are on coherency.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Xe, is a new driver for Intel GPUs that supports both integrated and
discrete platforms starting with Tiger Lake (first Intel Xe Architecture).
The code is at a stage where it is already functional and has experimental
support for multiple platforms starting from Tiger Lake, with initial
support implemented in Mesa (for Iris and Anv, our OpenGL and Vulkan
drivers), as well as in NEO (for OpenCL and Level0).
The new Xe driver leverages a lot from i915.
As for display, the intent is to share the display code with the i915
driver so that there is maximum reuse there. But it is not added
in this patch.
This initial work is a collaboration of many people and unfortunately
the big squashed patch won't fully honor the proper credits. But let's
get some git quick stats so we can at least try to preserve some of the
credits:
Co-developed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Philippe Lecluse <philippe.lecluse@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Co-developed-by: Faith Ekstrand <faith.ekstrand@collabora.com>
Co-developed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Co-developed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>