0-day recently added the include-what-you-use header checker and
it gave a warning on an adis patch. As such I decided to
run it on all the adis drivers and see if it made sensible suggestions.
Note this doesn't represent a complete list of what it suggested changing
as I filtered out a few on the basis they are standard headers used to
effectively include a bunch of other headers.
Could split this into a patch per driver if people prefer.
Note to anyone else trying this tool is that it is somewhat
of a loose cannon so you will be wanting to carefully check any
suggestions before proposing patches!
I thought about also reorganising the headers whilst here, but
that would make this patch harder to read, or lead to another rather
noisy patch across most of the files.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210603193616.3708447-1-jic23@kernel.org
The bulk read size is based on the size of an array that also has
space for the timestamp alongside the channels.
Fix that and also fix alignment of the buffer passed
to iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp.
Found during an audit of all calls to this function.
Fixes: 1ce0eda0f7 ("iio: mxc4005: add triggered buffer mode for mxc4005")
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210501170121.512209-6-jic23@kernel.org
Remove() callback calls pm_runtime_put_noidle() but there it is not
balancing a get. No actual affect because the runtime pm core prevents
the reference count going negative.
Whilst here use pm_runtime_resume_and_get() rather than open coded version.
Again, coccinelle script missed this one due to more complex code
structure.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Sean Nyekjaer <sean@geanix.com>
Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210509113354.660190-6-jic23@kernel.org
This driver alls pm_runtime_put_noidle() in it's remove function, but there
is no matching get call. This isn't a bug as runtime pm will not allow
the reference counter to go negative, but it is missleading so lets remove
it.
Whilst here use pm_runtime_resume_and_get() to tidy up some boilerplate.
The coccicheck script didn't get this one due to the less obvious
structure. Found by inspection.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210509113354.660190-8-jic23@kernel.org
A call to pm_runtime_put_noidle() doesn't match any call that would
result in a get(). It is safe because runtime pm core protects against
the reference counter going 0, but it makes it harder to understand the
code.
Whilst here use pm_runtime_resume_and_get() to tidy things up.
The Coccinelle script didn't get this one due to more complex code
structure.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210509113354.660190-5-jic23@kernel.org
The KX023-1025 accelerometer [1] seems to be some mixture of
KXCJK and KXTF9. It has the motion interrupt functionality from KXCJK
but also the tap detection from KXTF9, and a lot more functionality.
The configuration register map seems fairly different at first,
but actually all register bits used by the kxcjk-1013 driver are
available at the same bit positions on KX023-1025. It's just quite
misleading because:
1. The registers have entirely different names and are at different
addresses, but the bits are mostly named the same (and mean the same).
2. There are many more registers and bits used that are reserved on KXCJK
to enable additional functionality.
Ignoring all additionally available functionality for now, the KX023
works just fine after setting up the struct with the correct register
addresses. The only difference that needs to be handled additionally
is that the KX023 supports two configurable interrupt lines (INT1/2).
For now only INT1 is supported so we route all interrupts used by
the driver there.
[1]: https://kionixfs.azureedge.net/en/datasheet/KX023-1025%20Specifications%20Rev%2012.0.pdf
Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Most Kionix accelerometers seem to use fairly consistent register bits,
but the register addresses are not necessarily the same. This is already
partially the case for the KXTF9 (added in commit 1540d0106b
("iio: accel: kxcjk1013: add support for KXTF9")), which has some
registers at different addresses.
However, it's even much worse for the KX023-1025. All register bits
used by the kxcjk-1013 driver seem to be fully compatible with KX023,
but it has most registers at totally different addresses.
In preparation to add support for KX023-1025, move the fixed register
addresses into a struct so we can change them for KX023 more easily.
Cc: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
When flushing the hw fifo there is a bug in the I2C that prevents burst
reads of more than one sample pair.
Signed-off-by: Sean Nyekjaer <sean@geanix.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
When buffered sampling is enabled, the accelerometer will dump data into
the internal fifo and interrupt at watermark. Then the driver flushes
all data to the iio buffer.
As the accelerometer doesn't have internal timestamps, they are
approximated between the current and last interrupt.
Signed-off-by: Sean Nyekjaer <sean@geanix.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Preparation commit for the next that adds hw buffered sampling.
Adds the interrupt function and reads the devicetree for which
interrupt pin that is used.
Signed-off-by: Sean Nyekjaer <sean@geanix.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
This adds support for setting de accelerometers output data rate.
Primarily used for hardware buffered reads.
Signed-off-by: Sean Nyekjaer <sean@geanix.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
With CONFIG_ACPI=n, W=1 and -Werror, 0-day reports:
drivers/iio/accel/stk8312.c:644:36: error:
'stk8312_acpi_id' defined but not used
Apparently STK8312 is not a valid ACPI ID. Remove the ID table
as this is the only entry. If ACPI support is desired an explicit
of_device_id table should be added (rather than relying on the fallback
to the existing ID table).
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Continuing from Alexandru Ardelean's introduction of the split between
driver modifiable fields and those that should only be set by the core.
This could have been done in two steps to make the actual move after
introducing iio_device_id() but there seemed limited point to that
given how mechanical the majority of the patch is.
Includes fixup from Alex for missing mxs-lradc-adc conversion.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210426174911.397061-2-jic23@kernel.org
During commit 067fda1c06 ("iio: hid-sensors: move triggered buffer
setup into hid_sensor_setup_trigger"), the
iio_triggered_buffer_{setup,cleanup}() functions got moved under the
hid-sensor-trigger module.
The above change works fine, if any of the sensors get built. However, when
only the common hid-sensor-trigger module gets built (and none of the
drivers), then the IIO_TRIGGERED_BUFFER symbol isn't selected/enforced.
Previously, each driver would enforce/select the IIO_TRIGGERED_BUFFER
symbol. With this change the HID_SENSOR_IIO_TRIGGER (for the
hid-sensor-trigger module) will enforce that IIO_TRIGGERED_BUFFER gets
selected.
All HID sensor drivers select the HID_SENSOR_IIO_TRIGGER symbol. So, this
change removes the IIO_TRIGGERED_BUFFER enforcement from each driver.
Fixes: 067fda1c06 ("iio: hid-sensors: move triggered buffer setup into hid_sensor_setup_trigger")
Reported-by: Thomas Deutschmann <whissi@gentoo.org>
Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <aardelean@deviqon.com>
Acked-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210414084955.260117-1-aardelean@deviqon.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Whilst running some basic tests as part of writing up the dt-bindings for
this driver (to follow), it became clear it doesn't actually load
currently.
iio iio:device1: tried to double register : in_incli_x_index
adis16201 spi0.0: Failed to create buffer sysfs interfaces
adis16201: probe of spi0.0 failed with error -16
Looks like a cut and paste / update bug. Fixes tag obviously not accurate
but we don't want to bother carry thing back to before the driver moved
out of staging.
Fixes: 591298e54c ("Staging: iio: accel: adis16201: Move adis16201 driver out of staging")
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: <Stable@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Himanshu Jha <himanshujha199640@gmail.com>
Cc: Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@analog.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210321182956.844652-1-jic23@kernel.org
Commit 2e2366c2d1 ("iio: cros_ec: unify hw fifo attributes into the core file")
should be reverted as it set buffer extended attributes at
the wrong place. However, to revert it will requires to revert more
commits:
commit 165aea80e2 ("iio: cros_ec: use devm_iio_triggered_buffer_setup_ext()")
commit 21232b4456 ("iio: buffer: remove iio_buffer_set_attrs() helper")).
and we would still have conflict with more recent development.
commit ee708e6baa ("iio: buffer: introduce support for attaching more IIO buffers")
Instead, this commit reverts the first 2 commits without re-adding
iio_buffer_set_attrs() and set the buffer extended attributes at the
right place:
1. Instead of adding has_fw_fifo, deduct it from the configuration:
- EC must support FIFO (EC_FEATURE_MOTION_SENSE_FIFO) set.
- sensors send data a regular interval (accelerometer, gyro,
magnetomer, barometer, light sensor).
- "Legacy accelerometer" is only present on EC without FIFO, so we don't
need to set buffer attributes.
2. devm_iio_triggered_buffer_setup_ext() does not need to be called when
EC does not support FIFO, as there is no FIFO to manage.
3. Use devm_iio_triggered_buffer_setup_ext() when EC has a FIFO to
specify the buffer extended attributes.
Fixes: 2e2366c2d1 ("iio: cros_ec: unify hw fifo attributes into the core file")
Fixes: 165aea80e2 ("iio: cros_ec: use devm_iio_triggered_buffer_setup_ext()")
Signed-off-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210318184857.2679181-1-gwendal@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
When allocated with [devm_]iio_trigger_alloc(), set trig device parent to
the device the trigger is allocated for by default.
It can always be reassigned in the probe routine.
Change iio_trigger_alloc() API to add the device pointer to be coherent
with devm_iio_trigger_alloc, using similar interface to
iio_device_alloc().
Signed-off-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210309193620.2176163-2-gwendal@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
No functional change has been made with this patch. The main intent here
is to reduce code repetition of getting sensitivity attribute.
In the current implementation, sensor_hub_input_get_attribute_info() is
called from multiple drivers to get attribute info for sensitivity
field. Moving this to common place will avoid code repetition.
Signed-off-by: Ye Xiang <xiang.ye@intel.com>
Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210201054921.18214-2-xiang.ye@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
This change makes use of the devm_iio_kfifo_buffer_setup() helper, however
the unwind order is changed.
The life-time of the kfifo object is attached to the parent device object.
This is to make the driver a bit more consistent with the other IIO
drivers, even though (as it is now before this change) it shouldn't be a
problem.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210215104043.91251-5-alexandru.ardelean@analog.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
All drivers that already call devm_iio_kfifo_allocate() &
iio_device_attach_buffer() are simple to convert to
iio_device_attach_kfifo_buffer() in a single go.
This change does that; the unwind order is preserved.
What is important, is that the devm_iio_kfifo_buffer_setup() be called
after the indio_dev->modes is assigned, to make sure that
INDIO_BUFFER_SOFTWARE flag is set and not overridden by the assignment to
indio_dev->modes.
Also, the INDIO_BUFFER_SOFTWARE has been removed from the assignments of
'indio_dev->modes' because it is set by devm_iio_kfifo_buffer_setup().
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Ranostay <matt.ranostay@konsulko.com>x
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210215104043.91251-4-alexandru.ardelean@analog.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Some 2-in-1 laptops / convertibles with 360° (yoga-style) hinges,
use 2 KXCJ91008 accelerometers:
1 in their display using an ACPI HID of "KIOX010A"; and
1 in their base using an ACPI HID of "KIOX020A"
Since in this case we know the location of each accelerometer,
set the label for the accelerometers to the standardized
"accel-display" resp. "accel-base" labels. This way userspace
can use the labels to get the location.
This was tested on a Medion Akoya E2228T MD60250.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210207160901.110643-4-hdegoede@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Some 2-in-1 laptops / convertibles with 360° (yoga-style) hinges,
use 2 bmc150 accelerometers, defined by a single BOSC0200 ACPI
device node (1 in their base and 1 in their display).
Since in this case we know the location of each accelerometer,
set the label for the accelerometers to the standardized
"accel-display" resp. "accel-base" labels. This way userspace
can use the labels to get the location.
This was tested on a Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 11e 4th gen (N3450 CPU).
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210207160901.110643-3-hdegoede@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
