The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new(), which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://msgid.link/r/d9954f02ae51b1b0b0077c710d16bfaeafa216ec.1701778038.git.u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new(), which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://msgid.link/r/89c5f261707bf178e1508cf5dd55121f0da2dc3f.1701778038.git.u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new(), which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://msgid.link/r/ced2a73a1aeca3f33d4b194e4dbe2672ad84a50a.1701778038.git.u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new(), which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://msgid.link/r/2e96cf99c8d97b728d891a745e8f94ee39fbfee8.1701778038.git.u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new(), which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://msgid.link/r/fcaa42d7dd707031ed8dd9e8c28483891b879965.1701778038.git.u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new(), which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://msgid.link/r/639e796b36815a219ff1172cc758ba7378211d74.1701778038.git.u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new(), which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://msgid.link/r/76c7af01e2c8b3ab6585a04bc3f0d163fbb7fdf7.1701778038.git.u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Acked-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Merge series from Dang Huynh <danct12@riseup.net>:
PM8937 is a power management IC. It is used in various boards with
MSM8917, MSM8937, MSM8940 and APQ variants.
Pointer pdata is being initialized with a value that is never read. It is
being re-assigned later on with the return from a devm_kzalloc call.
Remove the redundant initialization, cleans up clang scan build warning:
drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c:1597:36: warning: Value stored
to 'pdata' during its initialization is never read [deadcode.DeadStores]
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231111195330.338324-1-colin.i.king@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The use_count of a regulator should only be incremented when the
enable_count changes from 0 to 1. Similarly, the use_count should
only be decremented when the enable_count changes from 1 to 0.
In the previous implementation, use_count was sometimes decremented
to 0 when some consumer called unbalanced disable,
leading to unexpected disable even the regulator is enabled by
other consumers. With this change, the use_count accurately reflects
the number of users which the regulator is enabled.
This should make things more robust in the case where a consumer does
leak references.
Signed-off-by: Rui Zhang <zr.zhang@vivo.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231103074231.8031-1-zr.zhang@vivo.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
This may be useful for debugging and develompent purposes, when there are
drivers that depend on regulators to be enabled but do not request them.
It is inspired from the clk_ignore_unused and pd_ignore_unused parameters,
that are used to keep firmware-enabled clocks and power domains on even if
these are not used by drivers.
The parameter is not expected to be used in normal cases and should not be
needed on a platform with proper driver support.
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231107190926.1185326-1-javierm@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Add interrupt support for under-voltage notification. This functionality
can be used on systems capable to detect under-voltage state and having
enough capacity to let the SoC do some emergency preparation.
This change enforce default policy to shutdown system as soon as
interrupt is triggered.
Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231025084614.3092295-6-o.rempel@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
When support for the MT6366 PMIC regulators was added, it was assumed
that it had the same functionality as MT6358. In reality there are
differences. A few regulators have different ranges, or were renamed
and repurposed, or removed altogether.
Add the 3 regulators that were missing from the original submission.
These are added for completeness. VSRAM_CORE is not used in existing
projects. VM18 and VMDDR feed DRAM related consumers, and are not used
in-kernel.
Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230928085537.3246669-11-wenst@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The (undocumented) possible values for the buck operating modes on the
MT6358 are the same as those on the MT6397, both for the device tree
bindings and the actual hardware register values.
Reuse the macros for the MT6397 PMIC in the MT6358 regulator driver by
including the mt6397-regulator.h binding header and replacing the
existing macros. This aligns it with other PMIC.
Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230928085537.3246669-7-wenst@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Add the necessary definitions for the PMA8084 PMIC to the
qcom_spmi-regulator driver to allow reading the actual voltages applied
to the hardware at runtime. This is mainly intended for debugging since
the regulators are usually controlled through the RPM firmware (via
qcom_smd-regulator).
Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230912-spmi-pm8909-v1-6-ba4b3bfaf87d@gerhold.net
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Add the necessary definitions for the PM8019 PMIC to the
qcom_spmi-regulator driver to allow reading the actual voltages applied
to the hardware at runtime. This is mainly intended for debugging since
the regulators are usually controlled through the RPM firmware (via
qcom_smd-regulator).
Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230912-spmi-pm8909-v1-4-ba4b3bfaf87d@gerhold.net
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
When fixing a memory leak in commit d3c731564e ("regulator: plug
of_node leak in regulator_register()'s error path") it moved the
device_initialize() call earlier, but did not move the `dev->class`
initialization. The bug was spotted and fixed by reverting part of
the commit (in commit 5f4b204b6b "regulator: core: fix kobject
release warning and memory leak in regulator_register()") but
introducing a different bug: now early error paths use `kfree(dev)`
instead of `put_device()` for an already initialized `struct device`.
Move the missing assignments to just after `device_initialize()`.
Fixes: d3c731564e ("regulator: plug of_node leak in regulator_register()'s error path")
Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/b5b19cb458c40c9d02f3d5a7bd1ba7d97ba17279.1695077303.git.mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Merge series from Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>:
Hi,
This is v3 of the remainder of the MT6358 regulator driver cleanup
and improvement series. v1 can be found here [1]; v2 is here [2].
Changes since v2:
- Merged patches dropped
- Fixed up pickable linear ranges' selector values
- Collected tags
- Patch adding missing regulator definitions squashed into patch using
the definitions; recommended by Krzysztof on my MT6366 series.
- Remaining dts patch split out to be sent separately
Changes since v1:
- Merged patches dropped
- Added patch to move VCN33 regulator status sync after ID check
- Added patch to fix VCN33 sync fail error message
- Added patch to add missing register definitions
Various discrepancies were found while preparing to upstream MT8186
device trees, which utilize the MT6366 PMIC, that is also covered by
this driver.
Patches 1~3 should go through the regulator tree, and patch 4 through
the soc/mediatek tree.
** Note: patch 2 needs an ack from Lee for the mfd header change.
This v3 series can be seen as two parts. v1 had three parts, but one
part was fully merged, and then v2 gained another cleanup. v3 drops
the "fixing bogus regulators" part: driver changes are fully merged
and device tree change will be sent separately.
Part 1 - Robust chip ID checking (patch 1)
Angelo suggested making the driver fail to probe if an unexpected chip
ID was found. Patch 1 implements this.
Part 2 - Output voltage fine tuning support (patches 2, 3)
Many of the LDOs on these PMIC support an extra level of output voltage
fine tuning. Most default to no offset, but a couple have a non-zero
offset by default. Previously this was unaccounted for in the driver and
device tree constraints. On the outputs with non-zero offset, this ends
up becoming a discrepancy between the device tree and actual hardware.
These two patches adds support for this second level of tuning, modeled
as bunch of linear ranges. While it's unlikely we need this level of
control, it's nice to be able to read back the accurate hardware
settings.
Please have a look.
Thanks
ChenYu
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20230609083009.2822259-1-wenst@chromium.org/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mediatek/20230721082903.2038975-1-wenst@chromium.org/
Chen-Yu Tsai (3):
regulator: mt6358: Fail probe on unknown chip ID
regulator: mt6358: Add output voltage fine tuning to fixed regulators
regulator: mt6358: Add output voltage fine tuning to variable LDOs
drivers/regulator/mt6358-regulator.c | 304 ++++++++++++---------------
include/linux/mfd/mt6358/registers.h | 6 +
2 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 166 deletions(-)
--
2.42.0.283.g2d96d420d3-goog
Some of the LDO regulators in the MT6358/MT6366 have sparsely populated
voltage tables, supported by custom get/set operators. While it works,
it requires more code and an extra field to store the lookup table.
These LDOs also have fine voltage calibration settings that can slightly
boost the output voltage from 0 mV to 100 mV, in 10 mV increments.
These combined could be modeled as a pickable set of linear ranges. The
coarse voltage setting is modeled as the range selector, while each
range has 11 selectors, starting from the range's base voltage, up to
+100 mV, in 10mV increments.
Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230913082919.1631287-4-wenst@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The "fixed" LDO regulators found on the MT6358 and MT6366 PMICs have
either no voltage selection register, or only one valid setting.
However these do have a fine voltage calibration setting that can
slightly boost the output voltage from 0 mV to 100 mV, in 10 mV
increments.
Add support for this by changing these into linear range regulators.
Some register definitions that are missing are also added.
Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230913082919.1631287-3-wenst@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The MT6358 and MT6366 PMICs, and likely many others from MediaTek, have
a chip ID register, making the chip semi-discoverable.
The driver currently supports two PMICs and expects to be probed on one
or the other. It does not account for incorrect mfd driver entries or
device trees. While these should not happen, if they do, it could be
catastrophic for the device. The driver should be sure the hardware is
what it expects.
Make the driver fail to probe if the chip ID presented is not a known
one.
Suggested-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Fixes: f0e3c6261a ("regulator: mt6366: Add support for MT6366 regulator")
Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230913082919.1631287-2-wenst@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The buck and linear range LDO (VSRAM_*) regulators share one set of ops.
This set includes support for get/set mode. However this only makes
sense for buck regulators, not LDOs. The callbacks were not checking
whether the register offset and/or mask for mode setting was valid or
not. This ends up making the kernel report "normal" mode operation for
the LDOs.
Create a new set of ops without the get/set mode callbacks for the
linear range LDO regulators.
Fixes: f67ff1bd58 ("regulator: mt6358: Add support for MT6358 regulator")
Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920085336.136238-1-wenst@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Merge series from Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>:
This patch series aims to add match data improvements for pv880x0
regulator driver.
These patches are only compile tested.
