When doing CSA in multi-link, there really isn't a need to
stop transmissions entirely. Add a feature flag for drivers
to indicate they can handle quiet in CSA (be it by parsing
themselves, or by implementing drv_pre_channel_switch()),
to make that possible.
Also clean up the csa_block_tx handling: it clearly cannot
handle multi-link due to the way queues are stopped, move
it to the sdata. Drivers should be doing it themselves for
working properly during CSA in MLO anyway. Also rename it
to indicate that it reflects TX was blocked at mac80211.
Reviewed-by: Miriam Rachel Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com>
Link: https://msgid.link/20240228095719.258439191541.I2469d206e2bf5cb244cfde2b4bbc2ae6d1cd3dd9@changeid
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
In the association request, we make some parameters depend on the
AP's HT/VHT information. This was broken by my code because it no
longer filled that information, making it all zero.
For HT that meant we wouldn't reduce our capabilities to 20 MHz if
needed, and for VHT we lost beamforming capabilities.
Fix this. It seems like it may even have been broken for all but
the assoc link before.
Fixes: 310c8387c6 ("wifi: mac80211: clean up connection process")
Reviewed-by: Miriam Rachel Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com>
Link: https://msgid.link/20240228094207.7dc812c2060a.Ibd591f9c214b4e166cf7171db3cf63bda8e3c9fd@changeid
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Whenever sta_flush() function is invoked, all STAs present in that
interface are flushed. In case of MLO, it is desirable to only flush such
STAs that are at least using a given link id as one of their links.
Add support for this by making change in the __sta_info_flush API argument
to accept a link ID. And then, only if the STA is using the given link as
one of its links, it would be flushed.
Signed-off-by: Aditya Kumar Singh <quic_adisi@quicinc.com>
Link: https://msgid.link/20240205162952.1697646-3-quic_adisi@quicinc.com
[reword commit message, in particular this isn't about "active" links]
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
If intending to associate with a lower bandwidth, remove capabilities
related to 320 MHz from the EHT capabilities element. Also change the
EHT MCS-NSS set accordingly: if just reducing 320->160 or similar the
format doesn't change, just cut off the last bytes. If changing from
higher bandwidth to 20 MHz only EHT STA, adjust the format.
Note that this also requires adjusting the caller in mlme.c since the
data written can now be shorter than it determined. We need to clean
all that up. Since the other callers pass NULL for the conn limit, we
don't need to change things there.
Link: https://msgid.link/20240129202041.b5f6df108c77.I0d8ea04079c61cb3744cc88625eeaf0d4776dc2b@changeid
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
EHT requires that stations are able to participate in
wider bandwidth OFDMA, i.e. parse downlink OFDMA and
uplink OFDMA triggers when they're not capable of (or
not connected at) the (wider) bandwidth that the AP
is using. This requires hardware configuration, since
the entity responsible for parsing (possibly hardware)
needs to know the AP bandwidth.
To support this, change the channel request to have
the AP's bandwidth for clients, and track that in the
channel context in mac80211. This means that the same
chandef might need to be split up into two different
contexts, if the APs are different. Interfaces other
than client are not participating in OFDMA the same
way, so they don't request any AP setting.
Note that this doesn't introduce any API to split a
channel context, so that there are cases where this
might lead to a disconnect, e.g. if there are two
client interfaces using the same channel context, e.g.
both 160 MHz connected to different 320 MHz APs, and
one of the APs switches to 160 MHz.
Note also there are possible cases where this can be
optimised, e.g. when using the upper or lower 160 Mhz,
but I haven't been able to really fully understand the
spec and/or hardware limitations.
If, for some reason, there are no hardware limits on
this because the OFDMA (downlink/trigger) parsing is
done in firmware and can take the transmitter into
account, then drivers can set the new flag
IEEE80211_VIF_IGNORE_OFDMA_WIDER_BW on interfaces to
not have them request any AP bandwidth in the channel
context and ignore this issue entirely. The bss_conf
still contains the AP configuration (if any, i.e. EHT)
in the chanreq.
Link: https://msgid.link/20240129194108.d3d5b35dd783.I939d04674f4ff06f39934b1591c8d36a30ce74c2@changeid
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
For channel contexts, mac80211 currently uses the cfg80211
chandef struct (control channel, center freq(s), width) to
define towards drivers and internally how these behave. In
fact, there are _two_ such structs used, where the min_def
can reduce bandwidth according to the stations connected.
Unfortunately, with EHT this is longer be sufficient, at
least not for all hardware. EHT requires that non-AP STAs
that are connected to an AP with a lower bandwidth than it
(the AP) advertises (e.g. 160 MHz STA connected to 320 MHz
AP) still be able to receive downlink OFDMA and respond to
trigger frames for uplink OFDMA that specify the position
and bandwidth for the non-AP STA relative to the channel
the AP is using. Therefore, they need to be aware of this,
and at least for some hardware (e.g. Intel) this awareness
is in the hardware. As a result, use of the "same" channel
may need to be split over two channel contexts where they
differ by the AP being used.
As a first step, introduce a concept of a channel request
('chanreq') for each interface, to control the context it
requests. This step does nothing but reorganise the code,
so that later the AP's chandef can be added to the request
in order to handle the EHT case described above.
Link: https://msgid.link/20240129194108.2e88e48bd2e9.I4256183debe975c5ed71621611206fdbb69ba330@changeid
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
There are still surprisingly many non-chanctx drivers, but in
mac80211 that code is a bit awkward. Simplify this by having
those drivers assign 'emulated' ops, so that the mac80211 code
can be more unified between non-chanctx/chanctx drivers. This
cuts the number of places caring about it by about 15, which
are scattered across - now they're fewer and no longer in the
channel context handling.
Link: https://msgid.link/20240129194108.6d0ead50f5cf.I60d093b2fc81ca1853925a4d0ac3a2337d5baa5b@changeid
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
In the code we currently check for support 80+80, 160
and 320 channel widths, but really the way this should
be (and is otherwise) handled is that we compute the
highest channel bandwidth given there, and then cut it
down to what we support. This is also needed for wider
bandwidth OFDMA support.
Change the code to remove this limitation and always
parse the highest possible channel width.
Reviewed-by: Miriam Rachel Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com>
Link: https://msgid.link/20240129194108.d06f85082e29.I47e68ed3d97b0a2f4ee61e5d8abfcefc8a5b9c08@changeid
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Rewrite the station-side connection handling. The connection
flags (IEEE80211_DISABLE_*) are rather confusing, and they're
not always maintained well. Additionally, for wider-bandwidth
OFDMA support we need to know the precise bandwidth of the AP,
which is currently somewhat difficult.
Rewrite this to have a 'mode' (S1G/legacy/HT/...) and a limit
on the bandwidth. This is not entirely clean because some of
those modes aren't completely sequenced (as this assumes in
some places), e.g. VHT doesn't exist on 2.4 GHz, but HE does.
However, it still simplifies things and gives us a good idea
what we're operating as, so we can parse elements accordingly
etc.
This leaves a FIXME for puncturing, this is addressed in a
later patch.
Reviewed-by: Ilan Peer <ilan.peer@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Miriam Rachel Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com>
Link: https://msgid.link/20240129194108.9451722c0110.I3e61f4cfe9da89008e1854160093c76a1e69dc2a@changeid
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
There are some changes coming to wireless-next that will
otherwise cause conflicts, pull wireless in first to be
able to resolve that when applying the individual changes
rather than having to do merge resolution later.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
An MLD may send TID-to-Link mapping request frame to negotiate
TID to link mapping with a peer MLD.
Support handling negotiated TID-to-Link mapping request frame
by parsing the frame, asking the driver whether it supports the
received mapping or not, and sending a TID-to-Link mapping response
to the AP MLD.
Theoretically, links that became inactive due to the received TID-to-Link
mapping request, can be selected to be activated but this would require
tearing down the negotiated TID-to-Link mapping, which is still not
supported.
Signed-off-by: Ayala Beker <ayala.beker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gregory Greenman <gregory.greenman@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Miri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com>
Link: https://msgid.link/20240102213313.0bc1a24fcc9d.Ie72e47dc6f8c77d4a2f0947b775ef6367fe0edac@changeid
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Johannes Berg says:
====================
Just a couple of more things over the holidays:
- first kunit tests for both cfg80211 and mac80211
- a few multi-link fixes
- DSCP mapping update
- RCU fix
* tag 'wireless-next-2024-01-03' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wireless/wireless-next:
wifi: mac80211: remove redundant ML element check
wifi: cfg80211: parse all ML elements in an ML probe response
wifi: cfg80211: correct comment about MLD ID
wifi: cfg80211: Update the default DSCP-to-UP mapping
wifi: cfg80211: tests: add some scanning related tests
wifi: mac80211: kunit: extend MFP tests
wifi: mac80211: kunit: generalize public action test
wifi: mac80211: add kunit tests for public action handling
kunit: add a convenience allocation wrapper for SKBs
kunit: add parameter generation macro using description from array
wifi: mac80211: fix spelling typo in comment
wifi: cfg80211: fix RCU dereference in __cfg80211_bss_update
====================
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240103144423.52269-3-johannes@sipsolutions.net
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Kalle Valo says:
====================
wireless-next patches for v6.8
The third "new features" pull request for v6.8. This is a smaller one
to clear up our tree before the break and nothing really noteworthy
this time.
Major changes:
stack
* cfg80211: introduce cfg80211_ssid_eq() for SSID matching
* cfg80211: support P2P operation on DFS channels
* mac80211: allow 64-bit radiotap timestamps
iwlwifi
* AX210: allow concurrent P2P operation on DFS channels
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
