This patch uses an approach closer to the nvidia driver to configure
both PLLs for high gddr5 memory clocks (usually above 2400MHz)
Previously nouveau used the one PLL as it was used for the lower clocks
and just adjusted the second PLL to get as close as possible to the
requested clock. This means for my card, that I got a 4050 MHz clock
although 4008 MHz was requested.
Now the driver iterates over a list of PLL configuration also used by
the nvidia driver and then adjust the second PLL to get near the
requested clock. Also it hold to some restriction I found while
analyzing the PLL configurations
This won't fix all gddr5 high clock issues itself, but it should be
fine on hybrid gpu systems as found on many laptops these days. Also
switching while normal desktop usage should be a lot more stable than
before.
v2: move the pll code into ramgk104
Signed-off-by: Karol Herbst <nouveau@karolherbst.de>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Pretty much every subdev/engine is going to need access to nvkm_device
shortly to touch registers and/or output messages.
The odd placement of the includes is necessary to work around some
inter-dependencies that currently exist. This will be fixed later.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
The namespace of NVKM is being changed to nvkm_ instead of nouveau_,
which will be used for the DRM part of the driver. This is being
done in order to make it very clear as to what part of the driver a
given symbol belongs to, and as a minor step towards splitting the
DRM driver out to be able to stand on its own (for virt).
Because there's already a large amount of churn here anyway, this is
as good a time as any to also switch to NVIDIA's device and chipset
naming to ease collaboration with them.
A comparison of objdump disassemblies proves no code changes.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
The namespace of NVKM is being changed to nvkm_ instead of nouveau_,
which will be used for the DRM part of the driver. This is being
done in order to make it very clear as to what part of the driver a
given symbol belongs to, and as a minor step towards splitting the
DRM driver out to be able to stand on its own (for virt).
Because there's already a large amount of churn here anyway, this is
as good a time as any to also switch to NVIDIA's device and chipset
naming to ease collaboration with them.
A comparison of objdump disassemblies proves no code changes.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>