cppcheck reports
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/dcn32/dcn32_fpu.c:1403:76: style:
Expression is always true because 'else if' condition is opposite to previous condition at line 1396. [multiCondition]
} else if (context->res_ctx.pipe_ctx[i].stream->mall_stream_config.type == SUBVP_PHANTOM) {
^
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/dcn32/dcn32_fpu.c:1396:69: note: first condition
if (context->res_ctx.pipe_ctx[i].stream->mall_stream_config.type != SUBVP_PHANTOM) {
^
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/dcn32/dcn32_fpu.c:1403:76: note: else if condition is opposite to first condition
} else if (context->res_ctx.pipe_ctx[i].stream->mall_stream_config.type == SUBVP_PHANTOM) {
It is not necessary to explicitly the check != condition, an else is simplier.
Fixes: 238debcaeb ("drm/amd/display: Use DML for MALL SS and Subvp allocation calculations")
Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
Currently we set FCLK p-state change
watermark calculated based on dummy
p-state latency when UCLK p-state is
not supported
[How]
Calculate FCLK p-state change watermark
based on on FCLK pstate change latency
in case UCLK p-state is not supported
Reviewed-by: Nevenko Stupar <Nevenko.Stupar@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alex Hung <alex.hung@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Stempen <vladimir.stempen@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
It's not supported in multi-display, but it is supported in 2nd eDP
screen only.
[How]
Remove multi display support, restrict number of planes for all
z-states support, but still allow Z8 if we're not using PWRSEQ0.
Reviewed-by: Charlene Liu <Charlene.Liu@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alex Hung <alex.hung@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[why]
Temporarly merge dc_link_dp functions into dc_link for the
purpose of removing dc_link_dp files. This is a transitional
change for later commits where we will further refactor dc_link
file.
Reviewed-by: George Shen <George.Shen@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alan Liu <HaoPing.Liu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenjing Liu <wenjing.liu@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
MALL size available can vary for different SKUs.
Use num_chans read from VBIOS to determine the available MALL size we can use
[How]
Define max_chans for DCN32 and DCN321.
If num_chans is max_chans, then return max_chans as we can access the
entire MALL space.
Otherwise, define avail_chans as the number of available channels we are
allowed instead.
Return corresponding number of channels back and use this to calculate
available MALL size.
Reviewed-by: Nevenko Stupar <Nevenko.Stupar@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alan Liu <HaoPing.Liu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Samson Tam <Samson.Tam@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Description]
- We cannot enable subvp on PSR panels because when
PSR is active, HUBP is turned off and we cannot rely
on the HUBP vline interrupt
- When in PSR, surface data also cannot be prefetched to MALL
because the main HUBP will be off
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Nevenko Stupar <Nevenko.Stupar@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alan Liu <HaoPing.Liu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alvin Lee <Alvin.Lee2@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[WHY and HOW]
When fast validating, we should be agnostic to any sort of optimizations
such as supporting Pstate or stutter in Vblank. We should change our
prefetch mode for fast validate to support none of these optimizations.
For example, Valve Index running at 144Hz can only be validated without
any support these optimizations.
Reviewed-by: Alvin Lee <Alvin.Lee2@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alan Liu <HaoPing.Liu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Saaem Rizvi <SyedSaaem.Rizvi@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
Iterating over every voltage state when we need to validate thousands of
configurations all at once (i.e. display hotplug) can take a significant
amount of time.
[How]
Check just the highest voltage state when fast_validate is true to
verify whether the configuration can work at all, then do a proper
validation including all voltage states later when fast_validate is false.
Reviewed-by: Nevenko Stupar <Nevenko.Stupar@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alan Liu <HaoPing.Liu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Bakoulin <Ilya.Bakoulin@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Dillon Varone <Dillon.Varone@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[WHY?]
Cannot only consider the MALL required from top pipes because of the MPO
case.
[HOW?]
Only count a pipe if it fits the following criteria:
1) does not have a top pipe (is the topmost pipe for that plane)
2) it does have a top pipe, but that pipe is associated with a different
plane
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <Daniel.Wheeler@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Nevenko Stupar <Nevenko.Stupar@amd.com>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Dillon Varone <Dillon.Varone@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
DCC meta was found to be detached from usable pixel data. Due to this
DCC meta and the end of the fetched part of the frame will be on not
be on the same mblk. Furthermore if the meta is not aligned to the mblk
size, then we require an extra mblk in MALL to account for this.
[How]
Always add an additional mblk when DCC is enabled for detachment and
misalignment.
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <Daniel.Wheeler@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Dillon Varone <Dillon.Varone@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Saaem Rizvi <SyedSaaem.Rizvi@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
MALL SS and Subvp use the same calculations for determining the size of
the required allocation for a given surface, which is already done in
DML. Add an interface to extract this information from VBA variables and
use in their respective helper functions. Also refactor existing code to
remove stale workarounds.
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <Daniel.Wheeler@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alvin Lee <Alvin.Lee2@amd.com>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Dillon Varone <Dillon.Varone@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Two issues existed:
1) Configs that support DRR, but have it disabled will fail subvp+vblank
validation incorrectly. Use subvp+vblank path for this case.
2) Configs that support DRR and have it enabled can use higher voltage level
than required if they also support subvp+vblank. Use lowest supported voltage
level for this case.
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <Daniel.Wheeler@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alvin Lee <Alvin.Lee2@amd.com>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Dillon Varone <Dillon.Varone@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
SwathSizePerSurfaceY[] and SwathSizePerSurfaceC[] values are uninitialized
because we are using += instead of = operator.
[How]
Assign values in loop with = operator.
Acked-by: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Samson Tam <samson.tam@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Aric Cyr <aric.cyr@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[WHY]
Subvp portion validation currently assumes that if vlevel provided does not
support pstate, then none will, and so subvp is not used.
[HOW]
After get vlevel, use lowest vlevel that supports pstate if it
exists, and use that for subvp validation.
Reviewed-by: Alvin Lee <Alvin.Lee2@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Jasdeep Dhillon <jdhillon@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Dillon Varone <Dillon.Varone@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Description]
- When merging a pipe that was previously pipe split, we need
to also clear the link resources or the next stream/plane that
uses the pipe may have an incorrect link resource state
Reviewed-by: Wenjing Liu <Wenjing.Liu@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Nevenko Stupar <Nevenko.Stupar@amd.com>
Acked-by: Jasdeep Dhillon <jdhillon@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alvin Lee <Alvin.Lee2@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Description]
- FW scheduling algorithm doesn't take into account of it's
a center timing
- This affects where the subvp mclk switch can be scheduled
(prevents HUBP vline interrupt from coming in if scheduled
incorrectly)
- Block subvp center timing cases for now
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Jasdeep Dhillon <jdhillon@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alvin Lee <Alvin.Lee2@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
Iterating over every voltage state when we need to validate thousands of
configurations all at once (i.e. display hotplug) can take a significant
amount of time.
[How]
Check just the highest voltage state when fast_validate is true to
verify whether the configuration can work at all, then do a proper
validation including all voltage states later when fast_validate is false.
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Jasdeep Dhillon <jdhillon@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Bakoulin <Ilya.Bakoulin@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why&How]
LinkCapacitySupport array is indexed with the number of voltage states and
not the number of max DPPs. Fix the error by changing the array
declaration to use the correct (larger) array size of total number of
voltage states.
Signed-off-by: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Description]
- This is a workaround to avoid concurrency issues -- a fast update
creates a shallow copy of the dc current_state, and removes all
subvp/phantom related flags.
- We want to prevent the fast update thread from removing those
flags in case there's another thread running that requires
the info for proper programming
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Jasdeep Dhillon <jdhillon@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alvin Lee <Alvin.Lee2@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
The 'commit 52e4fdf09ebc ("drm/amd/display: use low clocks for no plane
configs")' introduced a change that set low clock values for DCN31 and
DCN32. As a result of these changes, DC started to spam the log with the
following warning:
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 8 PID: 1486 at
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn20/dcn20_dccg.c:58
dccg2_update_dpp_dto+0x3f/0xf0 [amdgpu]
[..]
CPU: 8 PID: 1486 Comm: kms_atomic Tainted: G W 5.18.0+ #1
RIP: 0010:dccg2_update_dpp_dto+0x3f/0xf0 [amdgpu]
RSP: 0018:ffffbbd8025334d0 EFLAGS: 00010206
RAX: 00000000000001ee RBX: ffffa02c87dd3de0 RCX: 00000000000a7f80
RDX: 000000000007dec3 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffffa02c87dd3de0
RBP: ffffbbd8025334e8 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000005
R10: 00000000000331a0 R11: ffffffffc0b03d80 R12: ffffa02ca576d000
R13: ffffa02cd02c0000 R14: 00000000001453bc R15: ffffa02cdc280000
[..]
dcn20_update_clocks_update_dpp_dto+0x4e/0xa0 [amdgpu]
dcn32_update_clocks+0x5d9/0x650 [amdgpu]
dcn20_prepare_bandwidth+0x49/0x100 [amdgpu]
dcn30_prepare_bandwidth+0x63/0x80 [amdgpu]
dc_commit_state_no_check+0x39d/0x13e0 [amdgpu]
dc_commit_streams+0x1f9/0x3b0 [amdgpu]
dc_commit_state+0x37/0x120 [amdgpu]
amdgpu_dm_atomic_commit_tail+0x5e5/0x2520 [amdgpu]
? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x1f/0x40
? down_trylock+0x2c/0x40
? vprintk_emit+0x186/0x2c0
? vprintk_default+0x1d/0x20
? vprintk+0x4e/0x60
We can easily trigger this issue by using a 4k@120 or a 2k@165 and
running some of the kms_atomic tests. This warning is triggered because
the per-pipe clock update is not happening; this commit fixes this issue
by ensuring that DPPCLK is updated when calculating the watermark and
dlg is invoked.
Fixes: 2641c7b780 ("drm/amd/display: use low clocks for no plane configs")
Reported-by: Mark Broadworth <mark.broadworth@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmytro Laktyushkin <Dmytro.Laktyushkin@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[WHY?]
When calculating watermark and dlg values, the max mclk level index and
associated speed are needed to find the correlated dummy latency value.
Currently the incorrect index is given due to a clock manager refactor.
[HOW?]
Use num_memclk_level from num_entries_per_clk struct for getting the correct max
mem speed.
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Brian Chang <Brian.Chang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Dillon Varone <Dillon.Varone@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[WHY?]
Some configurations are constructed with very marginal DET buffers relative to
the worst possible time required to fetch a swath.
[HOW?]
Add a check to see that the DET buffer allocated for each pipe can hide the
latency for all pipes to fetch at least one swath.
Reviewed-by: Alvin Lee <Alvin.Lee2@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Brian Chang <Brian.Chang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Dillon Varone <Dillon.Varone@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[WHY?]
Prefetch is not budgetting time for dummy pstate when using subvp and low uclk.
[HOW?]
Override fclk change latency to use dummy pstate latency when calculating
prefetch schedule for subvp configs with low uclk.
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Brian Chang <Brian.Chang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Dillon Varone <Dillon.Varone@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
Even if we block Z9 based on crossover threshold it's possible to
allow for Z8.
[How]
There's support for this on DCN314, so update the support types to
include a z8 only and z8_z10 only state.
Update the decide_zstate_support function to allow for specifying
these modes based on the Z8 threshold.
DCN31 has z-state disabled, but still update the legacy code to
map z8_only = disallow and z10_z8_only = z10_only to keep the support
the same.
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Brian Chang <Brian.Chang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
This patch is used to fix following compilation issue with legacy gcc
error: ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only allowed in C99 mode
for (int i = flag_vlevel; i < context->bw_ctx.dml.soc.num_states; i++) {
Signed-off-by: Bob zhou <bobzhou2@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Guchun Chen <guchun.chen@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[WHY?]
DCN32 uses fclk pstate watermarks for dummy pstate, and must always be
supported.
[HOW?]
Validation needs to be run with fclk pstate latency set
as the dummy pstate latency to get correct prefetch and bandwidth outputs.
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Tom Chung <chiahsuan.chung@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Dillon Varone <Dillon.Varone@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Description]
- If we're enabling phantom pipe for a high
link rate display we could
fail DML on the phantom pipe since it's
set to virtual signal
- Therefore don't consider Output BPP for
phantom pipe
Reviewed-by: Dillon Varone <Dillon.Varone@amd.com>
Acked-by: Tom Chung <chiahsuan.chung@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alvin Lee <Alvin.Lee2@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[WHY?]
Subvp src/dst stream rectangles are not being created with the same scaling
factors as the main stream.
[HOW?]
Make sure subvp stream src rectangle scales its height to have the same src/dst
ratio as the main stream.
Reviewed-by: Alvin Lee <Alvin.Lee2@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Tom Chung <chiahsuan.chung@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Dillon Varone <Dillon.Varone@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[WHY?]
After applying pipesplit flags, DML can select a different configuration upon
revalidation, despite the desired one still being valid.
[HOW?]
Check the configuration is still has mode support, and apply it.
Reviewed-by: Martin Leung <Martin.Leung@amd.com>
Acked-by: Tom Chung <chiahsuan.chung@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Dillon Varone <Dillon.Varone@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
