The DT of_device.h and of_platform.h date back to the separate
of_platform_bus_type before it as merged into the regular platform bus.
As part of that merge prepping Arm DT support 13 years ago, they
"temporarily" include each other. They also include platform_device.h
and of.h. As a result, there's a pretty much random mix of those include
files used throughout the tree. In order to detangle these headers and
replace the implicit includes with struct declarations, users need to
explicitly include the correct includes.
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
Acked-by: Robert Foss <rfoss@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230714174545.4056287-1-robh@kernel.org
Wait until the command transfer FIFO is empty before loading in the next
command. The previous behavior where the code waited until command transfer
FIFO was not full suffered from transfer corruption, where the last command
in the FIFO could be overwritten in case the FIFO indicates not full, but
also does not have enough space to store another transfer yet.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Reviewed-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
Tested-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com> # imx8mm-icore
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230615201511.565923-1-marex@denx.de
The high-speed clock is hard-coded to the burst-clock
frequency specified in the device tree. However, when
using devices like certain bridge chips without burst mode
and varying resolutions and refresh rates, it may be
necessary to set the high-speed clock dynamically based
on the desired pixel clock for the connected device.
This also removes the need to set a clock speed from
the device tree for non-burst mode operation, since the
pixel clock rate is the rate requested from the attached
device like a bridge chip. This should have no impact
for people using burst-mode and setting the burst clock
rate is still required for those users. If the burst
clock is not present, change the error message to
dev_info indicating the clock use the pixel clock.
Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>
Reviewed-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
Tested-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com> # imx8mm-icore
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230526030559.326566-7-aford173@gmail.com
According to Table 13-45 of the i.MX8M Mini Reference Manual, the min
and max values for M and the frequency range for the VCO_out
calculator were incorrect. This information was contradicted in other
parts of the mini, nano and plus manuals. After reaching out to my
NXP Rep, when confronting him about discrepencies in the Nano manual,
he responded with:
"Yes it is definitely wrong, the one that is part
of the NOTE in MIPI_DPHY_M_PLLPMS register table against PMS_P,
PMS_M and PMS_S is not correct. I will report this to Doc team,
the one customer should be take into account is the Table 13-40
DPHY PLL Parameters and the Note above."
These updated values also match what is used in the NXP downstream
kernel.
To fix this, make new variables to hold the min and max values of m
and the minimum value of VCO_out, and update the PMS calculator to
use these new variables instead of using hard-coded values to keep
the backwards compatibility with other parts using this driver.
Fixes: 4d562c70c4 ("drm: bridge: samsung-dsim: Add i.MX8M Mini/Nano support")
Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Tested-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>
Reviewed-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
Tested-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com> # imx8mm-icore
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230526030559.326566-3-aford173@gmail.com
Implement support for DSI clock and data lane DN/DP polarity swap by
means of decoding 'lane-polarities' DT property. The controller does
support DN/DP swap of clock lane and all data lanes, the controller
does not support polarity swap of individual data lane bundles, add
a check which verifies all data lanes have the same polarity.
This has been validated on an imx8mm board that actually has the MIPI DSI
clock lanes inverted.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@denx.de>
Reviewed-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230514114625.98372-2-festevam@gmail.com
There is no need to exclusively set the .owner member of the struct
device_driver when defining the platform_driver struct. The Linux core
takes care of setting the .owner member as part of the call to
module_platform_driver() helper function.
Issue identified using the platform_no_drv_owner.cocci Coccinelle
semantic patch as:
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c:1957:6-11: No need to set .owner here.
The core will do it.
No functional changes are intended.
Signed-off-by: Anup Sharma <anupnewsmail@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/ZF9igb/nvL6GRBsq@yoga
Samsung MIPI DSIM controller is common DSI IP that can be used in various
SoCs like Exynos, i.MX8M Mini/Nano.
In order to access this DSI controller between various platform SoCs,
the ideal way to incorporate this in the drm stack is via the drm bridge
driver.
We already have a consolidated code for supporting component and bridge
based DRM drivers, so keep the exynos component based code in existing
exynos_drm_dsi.c and move generic bridge code as part of samsung-dsim.c
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
