We don't spam the debug when we create a normal object, nor when we
allocate their pages. Yet we do for stolen objects, and since these are
quite frequently used (at least once per context), the resulting spam
floods the dmesg in CI.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
A small selection of macros which can only accept dev_priv from
now on and a resulting trickle of fixups.
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: David Weinehall <david.weinehall@linux.intel.com>
A while ago we switched from a contiguous array of pages into an sglist,
for that was both more convenient for mapping to hardware and avoided
the requirement for a vmalloc array of pages on every object. However,
certain GEM API calls (like pwrite, pread as well as performing
relocations) do desire access to individual struct pages. A quick hack
was to introduce a cache of the last access such that finding the
following page was quick - this works so long as the caller desired
sequential access. Walking backwards, or multiple callers, still hits a
slow linear search for each page. One solution is to store each
successful lookup in a radix tree.
v2: Rewrite building the radixtree for clarity, hopefully.
v3: Rearrange execbuf to avoid calling i915_gem_object_get_sg() from
within an atomic section and so relax the allocation context to a simple
GFP_KERNEL and mutex.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161028125858.23563-10-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Since we now subclass struct drm_device, we can save pointer dances by
noting the equivalence of struct drm_device and struct drm_i915_private,
i.e. by using to_i915().
text data bss dec hex filename
1073824 4562 416 1078802 107612 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
1068976 4562 416 1073954 106322 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
Created by the coccinelle script:
@@
expression E;
identifier p;
@@
- struct drm_i915_private *p = E->dev_private;
+ struct drm_i915_private *p = to_i915(E);
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467628477-25379-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Do not use magic numbers, do not prefix stuff with "PCI_", do not
declare registers in implementation files. Also move the PCI
registers under correct comment in i915_reg.h.
v2:
- Consistently use BSM (not BDSM or other variants from PRM) (Chris)
- Also include register address to help identify the register (Chris)
v3:
- Refer to register value as *_val instead of *_reg (Chris)
v4:
- Make style checker happy
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Refer to the GGTT VM consistently as "ggtt->base" instead of just "ggtt",
"vm" or indirectly through other variables like "dev_priv->ggtt.base"
to avoid confusion with the i915_ggtt object itself and PPGTT VMs.
Refer to the GGTT as "ggtt" instead of indirectly through chaining.
As a bonus gets rid of the long-standing i915_obj_to_ggtt vs.
i915_gem_obj_to_ggtt conflict, due to removal of i915_obj_to_ggtt!
v2:
- Added some more after grepping sources with Chris
v3:
- Refer to GGTT VM through ggtt->base consistently instead of ggtt_vm
(Chris)
v4:
- Convert all dev_priv->ggtt->foo accesses to ggtt->foo.
v5:
- Make patch checker happy
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Refer to Global GTT consistently as GGTT, thus rename dev_priv->gtt
to dev_priv->ggtt and struct i915_gtt to struct i915_ggtt.
Fix a couple of whitespace problems while at it.
v2:
- Fix a typo in commit message.
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Elsewhere we have adopted the convention of using '_link' to denote
elements in the list (and '_list' for the actual list_head itself), and
that the name should indicate which list the link belongs to (and
preferrably not just where the link is being stored).
s/vma_link/obj_link/ (we iterate over obj->vma_list)
s/mm_list/vm_link/ (we iterate over vm->[in]active_list)
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
VMA creation and GEM list management need the big lock.
v2:
Mutex unlock ended on the wrong path somehow. (0-day, Julia Lawall)
Not to mention drm_gem_object_unreference was there in existing
code with no mutex held.
v3:
Some callers of i915_gem_object_create_stolen_for_preallocated
already hold the lock so move the mutex into the other caller
as well.
v4:
Changed to lockdep_assert_held. (Chris Wilson)
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
RC6 setup is shared between BIOS and Driver. BIOS sets up subset of RC6
setup registers. If those are not setup Driver should not enable RC6.
For implementing this, driver can check RC_CTRL0 and RC_CTRL1 values
to know if BIOS has enabled HW/SW RC6.
This will also enable user to control RC6 using BIOS settings alone.
RC6 related instability can be avoided by disabling via BIOS settings
till driver fixes it.
v2: Had placed logic in gen8 function by mistake. Fixed it.
Ensuring RPM is not enabled in case BIOS disabled RC6.
v3: Need to disable RPM if RC6 is disabled due to BIOS settings. (Daniel)
Runtime PM enabling happens before gen9_enable_rc6.
Moved the updation of enable_rc6 parameter in intel_uncore_sanitize.
v4: Added elaborate check for BIOS RC6 setup. Prepared check_pctx for bxt.
(Imre)
v5: Caching reserved stolen base and size in the driver private data.
Reorganized RC6 setup check. Moved from gen9_enable_rc6 to
intel_uncore_sanitize. (Imre)
v6: Rebasing on the patch submitted by Imre that moves gem_init_stolen
earlier in the load.
v7: Removed PWRCTX_MAXCNT_VCSUNIT1 check as it applies to SKL. (Imre)
v8: Fixed formatting and checkpatch issues. Fixed functional issue where
RC6 ctx size check was missing. (Imre)
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1454697809-22113-1-git-send-email-sagar.a.kamble@intel.com
Kabylake is a Intel® Processor containing Intel® HD Graphics
following Skylake.
It is Gen9p5, so it inherits everything from Skylake.
Let's start by adding the platform separated from Skylake
but reusing most of all features, functions etc. Later we
rebase the PCI-ID patch without is_skylake=1
so we don't replace what original Author did there.
Few IS_SKYLAKEs if statements are not being covered by this patch
on purpose:
- Workarounds: Kabylake is derivated from Skylake H0 so no
W/As apply here.
- GuC: A following patch removes Kabylake support with an
explanation: No firmware available yet.
- DMC/CSR: Done in a separated patch since we need to be carefull
and load the version for revision 7 since
Kabylake is Skylake H0.
v2: relative cleaner commit message and added the missed
IS_KABYLAKE to intel_i2c.c as pointed out by Jani.
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
There isn't an explicit stolen memory base register on gen2.
Some old comment in the i915 code suggests we should get it via
max_low_pfn_mapped, but that's clearly a bad idea on my MGM.
The e820 map in said machine looks like this:
[ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x000000000009f7ff] usable
[ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000000009f800-0x000000000009ffff] reserved
[ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000ce000-0x00000000000cffff] reserved
[ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000dc000-0x00000000000fffff] reserved
[ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000100000-0x000000001f6effff] usable
[ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f0000-0x000000001f6f7fff] ACPI data
[ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f8000-0x000000001f6fffff] ACPI NVS
[ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f700000-0x000000001fffffff] reserved
[ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fec10000-0x00000000fec1ffff] reserved
[ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000ffb00000-0x00000000ffbfffff] reserved
[ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fff00000-0x00000000ffffffff] reserved
That makes max_low_pfn_mapped = 1f6f0000, so assuming our stolen memory
would start there would place it on top of some ACPI memory regions.
So not a good idea as already stated.
The 9MB region after the ACPI regions at 0x1f700000 however looks
promising given that the macine reports the stolen memory size to be
8MB. Looking at the PGTBL_CTL register, the GTT entries are at offset
0x1fee00000, and given that the GTT entries occupy 128KB, it looks like
the stolen memory could start at 0x1f700000 and the GTT entries would
occupy the last 128KB of the stolen memory.
After some more digging through chipset documentation, I've determined
the BIOS first allocates space for something called TSEG (something to
do with SMM) from the top of memory, and then it allocates the graphics
stolen memory below that. Accordind to the chipset documentation TSEG
has a fixed size of 1MB on 855. So that explains the top 1MB in the
e820 region. And it also confirms that the GTT entries are in fact at
the end of the the stolen memory region.
Derive the stolen memory base address on gen2 the same as the BIOS does
(TOM-TSEG_SIZE-stolen_size). There are a few differences between the
registers on various gen2 chipsets, so a few different codepaths are
required.
865G is again bit more special since it seems to support enough memory
to hit 4GB address space issues. This means the PCI allocations will
also affect the location of the stolen memory. Fortunately there
appears to be the TOUD register which may give us the correct answer
directly. But the chipset docs are a bit unclear, so I'm not 100%
sure that the graphics stolen memory is always the last thing the
BIOS steals. Someone would need to verify it on a real system.
I tested this on the my 830 and 855 machines, and so far everything
looks peachy.
v2: Rewrite to use the TOM-TSEG_SIZE-stolen_size and TOUD methods
v3: Fix TSEG size for 830
v4: Add missing 'else' (Chris)
Tested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
The spec says we just can't use it.
v2:
- Add WA name (Ville).
- Add a big comment explaining that we still didn't fix the problem
where we inherit a framebuffer on the first page (Chris, Ville).
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Finally managed to dig up enough hints as to where the stolen
reserved stuff lives on ctg/elk. So add the code to decode it.
This was a combination of old chipset specs, diggin up an old
elk grits release with an ctg/elk AubLoad etc.
This was only tested on an elk as I don't have a ctg here
unfortunately.
This leaves ilk as the only platform that doesn't have a way
to detect this stuff. Looking at the register contents on my
ilk, it might be that the elk way works there too, but I
can't be sure since I can't affect the amount of reserved
memory on that machine, and if I am to trust the register
contents, by default it would reserve 0 bytes.
v2: s/WARN_ON_ONCE/WARN_ON/ since it's in one time init code
anyway (Paulo)
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
The FBC hardware for these platforms doesn't have access to the
bios_reserved range, so it always assumes the maximum (8mb) is used.
So avoid this range while allocating.
This solves a bunch of FIFO underruns that happen if you end up
putting the CFB in that memory range. On my machine, with 32mb of
stolen, I need a 2560x1440 mode for that.
Testcase: igt/kms_frontbuffer_tracking/fbc-* (given the right setup)
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
This stolen reserved stuff was introduced on g4x, so no need to waste
stolen on older platforms. Unfortunately configdb is no more so I can't
look up the right way to detect this stuff. I do have one hint as to
where the register might be on ctg, but I don't have a ctg to test it,
and on the elk I have here it doesn't contain sensible looking data.
For ilk grits suggegsts it might be in the same place as on snb (the
original PCI reg, not the mirror) but I can't be entirely sure about it
The register shows a round zero on my ilk.
So when there's no really good data for any of these platforms leave the
current "assume 1MiB" approach in place.
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
The gtt.stolen_size field is of type size_t, and so should be printed
using %zu to avoid build warnings on either 32-bit and 64-bit builds.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
I started digging this when I noticed that the BDW code was just
reserving 1mb by coincidence since it was reading reserved fields.
Then I noticed we didn't have any values set for SNB and earlier, and
that the HSW sizes were wrong. After that, I noticed that the reserved
area has a specific start, and may not exactly end where the stolen
memory ends. I also noticed the base pointer can be zero. So I decided
to just write a single patch fixing everything instead of 20 patches
that would be much harder to review.
This patch may solve random stolen memory corruption/problems on
almost all platforms. Notice that since this is always dealing with
the top of the stolen memory, the problems are not so easy to
reproduce - especially since FBC is still disabled by default.
One of the major differences of this patch is that we now look at both
the size and base address. By only looking at the size we were
assuming that the reserved area was always at the very top of
stolen, which is not always true.
After we merge the patch series that allows user space to allocate
stolen memory we'll be able to write IGT tests that maybe catch the
bugs fixed by this patch.
v2:
- s/BIOS reserved/stolen reserved/g (Chris)
- Don't DRM_ERROR if we can't do anything about it (Chris)
- Improve debug messages (Chris).
- Use the gen7 version instead of gen6 on HSW. Tom found some
documentation problems, so I think with gen7 we're on the safer
side (Tom).
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Backmerge fixes since it's getting out of hand again with the massive
split due to atomic between -next and 4.2-rc. All the bugfixes in
4.2-rc are addressed already (by converting more towards atomic
instead of minimal duct-tape) so just always pick the version in next
for the conflicts in modeset code.
All the other conflicts are just adjacent lines changed.
Conflicts:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
After the previous patch this flag will check always clear, as it's
never set for shmem backed and userptr objects, so we can remove it.
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
[danvet: Yeah this isn't really fixes but it's a nice cleanup to
clarify the code but not really worth the hassle of backmerging. So
just add to -fixes, we're still early in -rc.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Which should protect dev_priv->mm.stolen usage. This will allow us to
simplify the relationship between stolen memory, FBC and struct_mutex.
v2:
- Rebase after the stolen_remove_node() dev_priv patch move.
- I realized that after we fixed a few things related to the FBC CFB
size checks, we're not reallocating the CFB anymore with FBC
enabled, so we can just move all the locking to i915_gem_stolen.c
and stop worrying about freezing all the stolen alocations while
freeing/rellocating the CFB. This allows us to fix the "Too
coarse" observation from Chris.
Suggested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
With the abstractions created by the last patch, we can move this code
and the only thing inside intel_fbc.c that knows about dev_priv->mm is
the code that reads stolen_base.
We also had to move a call to i915_gem_stolen_cleanup_compression()
- now called intel_fbc_cleanup_cfb() - outside i915_gem_stolen.c.
v2:
- Rebase after the remove_node() changes on the previous patch.
Requested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
We want to move the FBC code out of i915_gem_stolen.c, but that code
directly adds/removes stolen memory nodes. Let's create this
abstraction, so i915_gme_stolen.c is still in control of all the
stolen memory handling. The abstraction will also allow us to add
locking assertions later.
v2:
- Add dev_priv as remove_node() argument since we'll need it later
(Chris).
Requested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
