When working on OpenRISC support for restartable sequences I noticed
and fixed these two issues with the riscv support bits.
1 The 'inc' argument to RSEQ_ASM_OP_R_DEREF_ADDV was being implicitly
passed to the macro. Fix this by adding 'inc' to the list of macro
arguments.
2 The inline asm input constraints for 'inc' and 'off' use "er", The
riscv gcc port does not have an "e" constraint, this looks to be
copied from the x86 port. Fix this by just using an "r" constraint.
I have compile tested this only for riscv. However, the same fixes I
use in the OpenRISC rseq selftests and everything passes with no issues.
Fixes: 171586a6ab ("selftests/rseq: riscv: Template memory ordering and percpu access mode")
Signed-off-by: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Acked-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250114170721.3613280-1-shorne@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Use rseq_unqual_scalar_typeof() rather than typeof() in macros to remove
the volatile qualifier (if there is one in the input argument), thus
generating better assembly code in those scenarios.
Also add extra brackets around the "p" parameter in RSEQ_READ_ONCE(),
RSEQ_WRITE_ONCE(), and rseq_unqual_scalar_typeof() across architectures
to preserve expectations of operator priority. Here is an example that
shows how operator priority may be an issue with missing parentheses:
#define m(p) \
do { \
__typeof__(*p) v = 0; \
} while (0)
void fct(unsigned long long *p1)
{
m(p1 + 1); /* works */
m(1 + p1); /* broken */
}
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
