[Why]
Enabling DPG causes HUBP to stay in blank constantly. If DPG is enabled
while an MCLK switch is taking place with SubVP, it will cause the MCLK
to never complete. This is because SubVP MCLK switch relies a HUBP
VLine interrupt, which will never occur when HUBP is constantly in
blank.
[How]
Disable SubVP when test pattern is enabled.
Reviewed-by: Alvin Lee <alvin.lee2@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Nevenko Stupar <nevenko.stupar@amd.com>
Acked-by: Tom Chung <chiahsuan.chung@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: George Shen <george.shen@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
DC is transitioning from DML to DML2, and this commit introduces all the
required changes for some of the already available ASICs and adds the
required code infra to support new ASICs under DML2. DML2 is also a
generated code that provides better mode verification and programming
models for software/hardware, and it enables a better way to create
validation tools. This version is more like a middle step to the
complete transition to the DML2 version.
Changes since V1:
- Alex: Fix typos
Changes since V2:
- Update DC includes
Changes since V3:
- Fix 32 bit compilation issues on x86
Changes since V4:
- Avoid compilation of DML2 on some not supported 32-bit architecture
- Update commit message
Co-developed-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Co-developed-by: Roman Li <roman.li@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Roman Li <roman.li@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Qingqing Zhuo <Qingqing.Zhuo@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[why]
There is a corner use case where the same plane pointer can be added into
dc state twice. In addition to plane state pointer check we also need to match
primary pipe before identifying the same plane.
Reviewed-by: Dillon Varone <dillon.varone@amd.com>
Acked-by: Wayne Lin <wayne.lin@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenjing Liu <wenjing.liu@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[why]
ODM power optimization excludes subvp power optimization but subvp
optimization can override ODM power optimization even if subvp optimization
configuration is not found. This happens with 4k144hz + 1 5k desktop plane.
We could have applied ODM power optimization however this is overridden by
subvp but subvp ends up deciding not apply its optimization.
[how]
Move ODM power optimization decision after subvp so it will try ODM power
optimization after subvp optimization is not possible.
Reviewed-by: Dillon Varone <dillon.varone@amd.com>
Acked-by: Stylon Wang <stylon.wang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenjing Liu <wenjing.liu@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Why:
vrr_active_fixed should also be checked when
determining if DRR is in use
How:
Add check for vrr_active_fixed when allow_freesync
and vrr_active_variable are also checked
Reviewed-by: Alvin Lee <alvin.lee2@amd.com>
Acked-by: Stylon Wang <stylon.wang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Austin Zheng <austin.zheng@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[why]
Current dc update design has limitation to support transition from
ODM combine to minimum transition to MPC combine state seamlessly
at the capability boundary when MPO plane is resizing. This will
require dc update high level refactor in order to remove the design
limitation. The decision is to block such use case for existing products
by limiting ODM power optimization support for only those surfaces
within guaranteed viewport size. This will prevent us from transitioning
to MPC combine state when ODM power optimization is enabled.
Reviewed-by: Dillon Varone <dillon.varone@amd.com>
Acked-by: Stylon Wang <stylon.wang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenjing Liu <wenjing.liu@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[why]
In some cases such as 8k desktop surface with 144Hz timing, we decide to
enable ODM power optimization but this surface doesn't have a minimum
transition state. Therefore we cannot switch off ODM power optimization seamlessly
This creates path depedency on ODM power optimization decision. i.e
whether or not we should switch off ODM power optimization is dependent
on if the transition to switch off ODM power optimization from current state
is seamless. We don't desire a path dependent power optimization policy
as it is too dynamic and difficult to maintain.
[how]
Attempt ODM power optimization only after we can validate new state without
using pipe combine.
Reviewed-by: Dillon Varone <dillon.varone@amd.com>
Acked-by: Stylon Wang <stylon.wang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenjing Liu <wenjing.liu@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[why]
The result of predict_pipe_split calculation is no longer used but the
function is not removed. This will cause unnecessary calculation
of pipe split prediction in every frame update.
Reviewed-by: Dillon Varone <dillon.varone@amd.com>
Acked-by: Stylon Wang <stylon.wang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenjing Liu <wenjing.liu@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
This commit implements a new pipe resource allocation logic for DCN32
when windowed ODM MPO flag is set to enable testing. By default the
flag is not set. It will be toggled on after we complete testing.
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <jun.lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Hamza Mahfooz <hamza.mahfooz@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenjing Liu <wenjing.liu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
- Override the det to adjust microschedule timings allow for
1080p configs with SubVP
- To lower unnecessary risk, we prevent multi 1080p configs
from using SubVP, as multi 1080p already has low idle power.
- Count the number of streams to verify that we are in a
SubVP config before overriding
Reviewed-by: Alvin Lee <alvin.lee2@amd.com>
Acked-by: Hamza Mahfooz <hamza.mahfooz@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Ethan Bitnun <ethan.bitnun@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Description]
SubVP needs to "calculate" the earliest in use META address
by using the current primary / meta addresses, but this leads
to a race condition where FW and driver can read/write the
address at the same time and intermittently produce inconsistent
address offsets. To mitigate this issue without locking (too slow),
save each surface flip addr into scratch registers and use this
to keep track of the earliest in use META addres.
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <jun.lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Wayne Lin <wayne.lin@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alvin Lee <alvin.lee2@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[why]
There is a lack of encapsulation of pipe connection representation in pipe context.
This has caused many challenging bugs and coding errors with repeated
logic to identify the same pipe type.
[how]
Formally define pipe types and provide getters to identify a pipe type and
find a pipe based on specific requirements. Update existing logic in non dcn
specific files and dcn32 and future versions to use the new accessors.
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <jun.lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Stylon Wang <stylon.wang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenjing Liu <wenjing.liu@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
Current recout calculation has a few assumptions and implementation
for MPO + ODM combine calculation is very specific. The equation has
too many cases without enough comments to document the detail.
[How]
The change remove the following assumptions:
1. When MPO is enabled, we only allow ODM Combine 2:1
2. ODM Combine always has even segment width.
3. Secondary MPO plane's pipe_ctx copies pre_odm_pipe from
its top pipe.
The change applies a generic formula with more details in comment to
document this solution so it is eaiser to learn and debug later.
Reviewed-by: Dmytro Laktyushkin <dmytro.laktyushkin@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alex Hung <alex.hung@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenjing Liu <wenjing.liu@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
Want to further constrain these refresh rate conditions for SubVP:
- SubVP + SubVP: either both <= 120Hz or both between 120-165Hz
- SubVP + DRR: SubVP <= 120Hz
- SubVP + VBlank: SubVP <= 120Hz
[How]
Add constraints in subvp_subvp_admissable(),
dcn32_subvp_drr_admissable() and dcn32_subvp_vblank_admissable()
Reviewed-by: Alvin Lee <alvin.lee2@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alan Liu <haoping.liu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Samson Tam <samson.tam@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Description]
- SubVP high refresh should only be enabled if all displays
are >= 120hz. We do not want to accidentally enables configs
such as 60hz[SubVP] + 120hz[SubVP]
- Ensure that the SubVP config generation code does not produce
configs such as 60hz[SubVP] + 120hz[SubVP]
- Also add admissibility checks to ensure these configs do not
pass as valid configs
Acked-by: Stylon Wang <stylon.wang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alvin Lee <alvin.lee2@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Dillon Varone <Dillon.Varone@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Why:
Limit maximum clock speeds to DC mode limits for DC mode systems
How:
Store DC mode limits when individual clocks are initialized and
cap the values when building the clock table
Acked-by: Stylon Wang <stylon.wang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Austin Zheng <austin.zheng@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alvin Lee <Alvin.Lee2@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Fixes the following gcc with W=1:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/dcn32/dcn32_fpu.c:2806: warning: Cannot understand * *************************************************************************
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/dcn32/dcn32_fpu.c:2855: warning: Cannot understand * *************************************************************************
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/dcn32/dcn32_fpu.c:2900: warning: Function parameter or member 'dc' not described in 'dcn32_assign_fpo_vactive_candidate'
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/dcn32/dcn32_fpu.c:2900: warning: Function parameter or member 'context' not described in 'dcn32_assign_fpo_vactive_candidate'
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/dcn32/dcn32_fpu.c:2900: warning: Function parameter or member 'fpo_candidate_stream' not described in 'dcn32_assign_fpo_vactive_candidate'
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/dcn32/dcn32_fpu.c:2929: warning: Function parameter or member 'dc' not described in 'dcn32_find_vactive_pipe'
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/dcn32/dcn32_fpu.c:2929: warning: Function parameter or member 'context' not described in 'dcn32_find_vactive_pipe'
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/dcn32/dcn32_fpu.c:2929: warning: Function parameter or member 'vactive_margin_req_us' not described in 'dcn32_find_vactive_pipe'
Cc: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Cc: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Cc: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Srinivasan Shanmugam <srinivasan.shanmugam@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Description]
- Previously we wanted to apply extra 60us of prefetch for min DCFCLK
(200Mhz), but DCFCLK can be calculated to be 201Mhz which underflows
also without the extra prefetch
- Instead, apply the the extra 60us prefetch for any DCFCLK freq <=
300Mhz
Reviewed-by: Nevenko Stupar <nevenko.stupar@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <jun.lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Tom Chung <chiahsuan.chung@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alvin Lee <alvin.lee2@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why && How]
We would like to have visual confirm color support for MCLK switch.
1. Set visual confirm color to yellow: Vblank MCLK switch.
2. Set visual confirm color to cyan: FPO + Vblank MCLK
switch.
3. Set visual confirm color to pink: Vactive MCLK switch.
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <jun.lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Leo (Hanghong) Ma <hanghong.ma@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Description]
- Some 1920x1080@60hz displays have VBLANK time > 600us which we
still want to accept for FPO + Vactive configs based on testing
- Increase max VBLANK time to 1000us to allow these configs
for FPO + Vactive
- Increase minimum vactive switch margin for FPO + Vactive to 200us
- Based on testing, 1920x1080@120hz can have a switch margin
of ~160us which requires significantly longer FPO stretch
margin (5ms) which we don't want to accept for now
- Also move margins into debug option
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <jun.lei@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Nevenko Stupar <nevenko.stupar@amd.com>
Acked-by: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alvin Lee <alvin.lee2@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Description]
- For FPO + Vactive cases, we rely on the Vactive display to be at
it's nominal refresh rate because the Vactive pipe may not necessarily
assert P-State allow while it's in VBLANK
- For cases where the Vactive display has a stretched VBLANK due to
VRR, we could underflow when trying to complete an FPO + Vactive
MCLK switch because the FPO display has limited VBLANK time in
waiting for the Vactive display to assert P-State allow naturally
- Block FPO + Vactive if the Vactive display has VRR active (variable
or fixed)
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alex Hung <alex.hung@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alvin Lee <Alvin.Lee2@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
It is likely p1_min_meta_chunk_bytes was expected here, instead of
min_meta_chunk_bytes.
Test the correct variable.
Fixes: dda4fb85e4 ("drm/amd/display: DML changes for DCN32/321")
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Signed-off-by: Hamza Mahfooz <hamza.mahfooz@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
This reverts commit 80c6d6804f.
The orignal commit was intended as a workaround to prevent underflow and
flickering when using one normal monitor and the other high refresh rate
monitor (> 120Hz).
This patch is being reverted in favour of a software solution to enable
SubVP+DRR
Signed-off-by: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
- We want to disable SubVP if Graphics Error Correction/Correcting Code
(GECC) is enabled.
- After reading feature caps from DMCUB during init, use the GECC
enable/disable info to determine if SubVP can be enabled or not.
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <Nicholas.Kazlauskas@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alvin Lee <Alvin.Lee2@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Description]
- Add debug option to enable SubVP for high refresh rate displays
- For now limit the enabled modes based on a table in debug options
- Currently disabled by default
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alvin Lee <Alvin.Lee2@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
- Previously update_clocks was overriding pstate support if
it checked that there were no planes
- However, P-State support should be determined in validation
phase instead
- This fixes an issue where a transition from FPO -> no planes
expects UCLK MAX, but update_clocks was overriding to set
UCLK to min
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alvin Lee <Alvin.Lee2@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
For pstate change, allow DML to loop through
all possible prefetch combinations so as to
support more display configurations. Set the max
and min prefetch modes to enable the sequence.
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Description]
- Since we do not use optimized watermark settings for MALL,
set D = A
- PMFW uses Set D for d0i3.1, so driver should make D = A for the
time being
- If we choose to optimize in the future we can set watermarks D
correctly
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Qingqing Zhuo <qingqing.zhuo@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alvin Lee <Alvin.Lee2@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
When using FPO, there is some misconfiguration that happens for the lack
of configuration of the MCLK switch in some circumstances. This commit
adds the required field update when using the MCLK switch.
Reviewed-by: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
All clock values came from firmware, but bounding box values can be
helpful in some debug situations. This commit updates some of the values
associated with clock speed and memory channels.
Reviewed-by: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Description]
- When determining FPO support, include FPO + VActive support
- Support FPO + VActive if one display meets regular requirements
for FPO and the second display is able to switch in VACTIVE with
a given amount of margin
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Qingqing Zhuo <qingqing.zhuo@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alvin Lee <Alvin.Lee2@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
In 2560x1600@240p eDP panel, driver use lowest voltage level
to play 1080p video cause underflow. According to HW SPEC,
the senario should use high voltage level.
[How]
ChromaPre value is zero when bandwidth validation.
Correct ChromaPre calculation.
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <Nicholas.Kazlauskas@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Qingqing Zhuo <qingqing.zhuo@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Hsieh <Paul.Hsieh@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
