Rename intel_shared_dpll to intel_dpll to represent both
shared and individual dplls. Since from MTL each PHY has it's
own PLL making the shared PLL naming a little outdated. In an
effort to make this framework accepting of future changes this
needs to be done.
--v2
-Use intel_dpll_global to make sure names start with the filename
[Jani/Ville]
-Explain the need of this rename [Jani]
--v3
-Just keep it intel_dpll [Jani]
--v4
-Fix comment [Jani]
-Use just num_dpll and dplls [Jani]
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250515071801.2221120-7-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
Rename intel_shared_dpll_funcs to intel_dpll_funcs
since it needs to represent both shared and individual
dplls.
--v2
-Change intel_global_dpll to intel_dpll_global to be more
in line with the naming standard where the name should
start with the file name [Jani]
--v3
-Drop shared and global altogether [Jani]
--v4
-Keep declarations sorted [Jani]
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250515071801.2221120-6-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
Use intel_display as an argument for intel_shared_dpll_init() and
replace drm_i915_private in function wherever possible.
While at it prefer using display->platform.xx over IS_PLATFORM.
Initialize dpio_phy and dpio_channel since with IS_GEMINILAKE()
and IS_BROXTON() compiler knows it will return false for xe but
since display->platform.xx is a runtime check which means the
compiler sees a potential path where uninitialized variables
could be accessed and raises a warning.
--v2
-Amend commit message to explain why some variables were
initialized [Jani]
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250212074542.3569452-8-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
Currently, we may bump into pll mismatch errors during the
state verification stage. This happens when we try to use
fastset instead of full modeset. Hence, we would need to add
a check for pipe configuration to ensure that the sw and the
hw configuration will match. In case of hw and sw mismatch,
we would need to disable fastset and use full modeset instead.
v2: Fix C10 error on PLL comparison (BAT)
Use memcmp instead of fixed loops for pll config
comparison (Jani)
Clean up and use intel_cx0pll_dump_hw_state() to dump
pll information (Jani)
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240523134649.31452-3-mika.kahola@intel.com
intel_dpll_hw_state contains space for all possible PLL
register values across all platforms. That is rather wasteful
as each machine only needs to store the registers values
that are appropriate for the platform.
Turn intel_dpll_hw_state into a union so that we don't
waste memory for the register values of other platforms.
And let's use an anonymous union so that we don't have
to do tons of s/struct/union/ all over the place.
pahole:
struct intel_dpll_hw_state {
- struct i9xx_dpll_hw_state i9xx; /* 0 16 */
- struct hsw_dpll_hw_state hsw; /* 16 8 */
- struct skl_dpll_hw_state skl; /* 24 12 */
- struct bxt_dpll_hw_state bxt; /* 36 44 */
- /* --- cacheline 1 boundary (64 bytes) was 16 bytes ago --- */
- struct icl_dpll_hw_state icl; /* 80 60 */
+ union {
+ struct i9xx_dpll_hw_state i9xx; /* 0 16 */
+ struct hsw_dpll_hw_state hsw; /* 0 8 */
+ struct skl_dpll_hw_state skl; /* 0 12 */
+ struct bxt_dpll_hw_state bxt; /* 0 44 */
+ struct icl_dpll_hw_state icl; /* 0 60 */
+ }; /* 0 60 */
- /* size: 140, cachelines: 3, members: 5 */
- /* last cacheline: 12 bytes */
+ /* size: 60, cachelines: 1, members: 1 */
+ /* last cacheline: 60 bytes */
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240412182703.19916-18-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
struct intel_dpll_hw_state has a spot for all possible
PLL registers across all platforms (well, apart from
cx0/snps). This makes it rather confusing when trying to
figure out which members belong to which platform(s).
Split the struct up into five different platform specific
sub-structures. For now this will actually increase the size
a little bit as we have to duplicate a few members from
skl to icl, but that will be remedied soon when we turn
the thing into a union.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240412182703.19916-17-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
We have zero consistency in out PLL state naming scheme. Try
to unify things a bit by using 'dpll_hw_state' for high level
stuff and just 'hw_state' for low level stuff. Currently both
are the same, but I want to unionize intel_dpll_hw_state at
which point using different names can make it more clear whether
we're talking about the whole union or just the embedded platform
specific struct.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240412182703.19916-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Just include the JSL/EHL DPLL4 extra power domain in the dpll_info
struct. This way the same approach could be used by other platforms
as well (should the need arise), and we don't have to sprinkle
platform checks all over the place.
Note that I'm perhaps slightly abusing things here as
power_domain==0 (which is actually POWER_DOMAIN_DISPLAY_CORE) now
indicates that no extra power domain is needed. I suppose using
POWER_DOMAIN_INVALID would be more correct, but then we'd have to
sprinkle that to all the other DPLLs.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231012123522.26045-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
No one really cares how we store the shared_dplls. Currently
it happens to be an array, but we could change that to a more
flexible scheme at some point. Hide the implementation details
behind an iterator macro.
The slight downside is the pll variable moving out of the
loop scope, but maybe someday soon we'll start to convert
everything over to having declarations within for-statements...
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231003200620.11633-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
There's no good reason to keep around this PLL index == PLL ID
footgun. Get rid of it.
Both i915->shared_dplls[] and state->shared_dpll[] are indexed
by the same thing now, which is just the index we get at
initialization from dpll_mgr->dpll_info[]. The rest is all about
PLL IDs now.
v2: Add pll->index to mimic drm_crtc & co.
Remove the comment saying ID should match the index
v3: s/i/pll->index/ in debugfs loop (Jani)
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231003200620.11633-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Make sure that the CRTC state is reset correctly, as expected after
disabling the CRTC.
In particular this change will:
- Zero all the CSC blob pointers after intel_crtc_free_hw_state()
has freed them.
- Zero the shared DPLL and port PLL pointers and clear the
corresponding CRTC reference flag in the PLL state.
- Reset all the transcoder and pipe fields.
v2:
- Reset fully the CRTC state. (Ville)
- Clear pipe active flags in the DPLL state.
v3:
- Clear only the CRTC reference flag and add a helper for this.
(Ville)
v4:
- Rebased on previous patch, adding
intel_unreference_shared_dpll_crtc() separately. (Ville)
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230510103131.1618266-4-imre.deak@intel.com
A new programming step was added to combo and TC PLL sequences.
If override_AFC_startup is set in VBT, driver should overwrite
AFC_startup value to 0x0 or 0x7 in PLL's div0 register.
The current understating is that only TGL needs this and all other
display 12 and newer platforms will have a older VBT or a newer VBT
with override_AFC_startup set to 0 but in any case there is a
drm_warn_on_once() to let us know if this is not true.
v2:
- specification updated, now AFC can be override to 0x0 or 0x7
- not using a union for div0 (Imre)
- following previous wrong vbt naming: bits instead of bytes (Imre)
BSpec: 49204
BSpec: 20122
BSpec: 49968
BSpec: 71360
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220216134059.25348-1-jose.souza@intel.com
All the other places we have use pipes instead of crtc indices
when tracking resource usage. Life is easier when we do it
the same way always, so switch the dpll mgr to using pipes as
well. Looks like it was actually mixing these up in some cases
so it would not even have worked correctly except when the
device has a contiguous set of pipes starting from pipe A.
Granted, that is the typical case but supposedly it may not
always hold on modern hw.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210224144214.24803-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Currently the DPLL .get_freq() uses pll->state.hw_state which
is not the thing we actually read out (except during driver
load/resume). Outside of that pll->state.hw_state is just the
thing we committed last time around. During state check we
just read the thing into crtc_state->dpll_hw_state, so that
is what we should use for calculating the DPLL output frequency.
I think we used to do this so that the results of the readout
were actually used, but somehow it got changed when the
.get_freq() refactoring happened.
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201109231239.17002-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
