BCM5325 and BCM5365 are part of a much older generation of switches which,
due to their limited number of ports and VLAN entries (up to 256) allowed
a single 64-bit register to hold a full ARL entry.
This requires a little bit of massaging when reading, writing and
converting ARL entries in both directions.
Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@gmail.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250614080000.1884236-6-noltari@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
When Linux sends out untagged traffic from a port, it will enter the CPU
port without any VLAN tag, even if the port is a member of a vlan
filtering bridge with a PVID egress untagged VLAN.
This makes the CPU port's PVID take effect, and the PVID's VLAN
table entry controls if the packet will be tagged on egress.
Since commit 45e9d59d39 ("net: dsa: b53: do not allow to configure
VLAN 0") we remove bridged ports from VLAN 0 when joining or leaving a
VLAN aware bridge. But we also clear the untagged bit, causing untagged
traffic from the controller to become tagged with VID 0 (and priority
0).
Fix this by not touching the untagged map of VLAN 0. Additionally,
always keep the CPU port as a member, as the untag map is only effective
as long as there is at least one member, and we would remove it when
bridging all ports and leaving no standalone ports.
Since Linux (and the switch) treats VLAN 0 tagged traffic like untagged,
the actual impact of this is rather low, but this also prevented earlier
detection of the issue.
Fixes: 45e9d59d39 ("net: dsa: b53: do not allow to configure VLAN 0")
Signed-off-by: Jonas Gorski <jonas.gorski@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250602194914.1011890-1-jonas.gorski@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Add RGMII to supported interfaces for BCM63xx RGMII ports so they can be
actually used in RGMII mode.
Without this, phylink will fail to configure them:
[ 3.580000] b53-switch 10700000.switch GbE3 (uninitialized): validation of rgmii with support 0000000,00000000,00000000,000062ff and advertisement 0000000,00000000,00000000,000062ff failed: -EINVAL
[ 3.600000] b53-switch 10700000.switch GbE3 (uninitialized): failed to connect to PHY: -EINVAL
[ 3.610000] b53-switch 10700000.switch GbE3 (uninitialized): error -22 setting up PHY for tree 0, switch 0, port 4
Fixes: ce3bf94871 ("net: dsa: b53: add support for BCM63xx RGMIIs")
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonas Gorski <jonas.gorski@gmail.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250602193953.1010487-5-jonas.gorski@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
BCM63xx internal switches do not support EEE, but provide multiple RGMII
ports where external PHYs may be connected. If one of these PHYs are EEE
capable, we may try to enable EEE for the MACs, which then hangs the
system on access of the (non-existent) EEE registers.
Fix this by checking if the switch actually supports EEE before
attempting to configure it.
Fixes: 22256b0afb ("net: dsa: b53: Move EEE functions to b53")
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
Tested-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonas Gorski <jonas.gorski@gmail.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250602193953.1010487-2-jonas.gorski@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
When bridged ports and standalone ports share a VLAN, e.g. via VLAN
uppers, or untagged traffic with a vlan unaware bridge, the ASIC will
still try to forward traffic to known FDB entries on standalone ports.
But since the port VLAN masks prevent forwarding to bridged ports, this
traffic will be dropped.
This e.g. can be observed in the bridge_vlan_unaware ping tests, where
this breaks pinging with learning on.
Work around this by enabling the simplified EAP mode on switches
supporting it for standalone ports, which causes the ASIC to redirect
traffic of unknown source MAC addresses to the CPU port.
Since standalone ports do not learn, there are no known source MAC
addresses, so effectively this redirects all incoming traffic to the CPU
port.
Fixes: ff39c2d686 ("net: dsa: b53: Add bridge support")
Signed-off-by: Jonas Gorski <jonas.gorski@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250508091424.26870-1-jonas.gorski@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
When a port gets set up, b53 disables learning and enables the port for
flooding. This can undo any bridge configuration on the port.
E.g. the following flow would disable learning on a port:
$ ip link add br0 type bridge
$ ip link set sw1p1 master br0 <- enables learning for sw1p1
$ ip link set br0 up
$ ip link set sw1p1 up <- disables learning again
Fix this by populating dsa_switch_ops::port_setup(), and set up initial
config there.
Fixes: f9b3827ee6 ("net: dsa: b53: Support setting learning on port")
Signed-off-by: Jonas Gorski <jonas.gorski@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250429201710.330937-12-jonas.gorski@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To allow runtime switching between vlan aware and vlan non-aware mode,
we need to properly keep track of any bridge VLAN configuration.
Likewise, we need to know when we actually switch between both modes, to
not have to rewrite the full VLAN table every time we update the VLANs.
So keep track of the current vlan_filtering mode, and on changes, apply
the appropriate VLAN configuration.
Fixes: 0ee2af4ebb ("net: dsa: set configure_vlan_while_not_filtering to true by default")
Signed-off-by: Jonas Gorski <jonas.gorski@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250429201710.330937-10-jonas.gorski@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Documentation/networking/switchdev.rst says:
- with VLAN filtering turned off: the bridge is strictly VLAN unaware and its
data path will process all Ethernet frames as if they are VLAN-untagged.
The bridge VLAN database can still be modified, but the modifications should
have no effect while VLAN filtering is turned off.
This breaks if we immediately apply the VLAN configuration, so skip
writing it when vlan_filtering is off.
Fixes: 0ee2af4ebb ("net: dsa: set configure_vlan_while_not_filtering to true by default")
Signed-off-by: Jonas Gorski <jonas.gorski@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250429201710.330937-9-jonas.gorski@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Since we cannot set forwarding destinations per VLAN, we should not have
a VLAN 0 configured, as it would allow untagged traffic to work across
ports on VLAN aware bridges regardless if a PVID untagged VLAN exists.
So remove the VLAN 0 on join, an re-add it on leave. But only do so if
we have a VLAN aware bridge, as without it, untagged traffic would
become tagged with VID 0 on a VLAN unaware bridge.
Fixes: a2482d2ce3 ("net: dsa: b53: Plug in VLAN support")
Signed-off-by: Jonas Gorski <jonas.gorski@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250429201710.330937-8-jonas.gorski@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Currently the PVID of ports are only set when adding/updating VLANs with
PVID set or removing VLANs, but not when clearing the PVID flag of a
VLAN.
E.g. the following flow
$ ip link add br0 type bridge vlan_filtering 1
$ ip link set sw1p1 master bridge
$ bridge vlan add dev sw1p1 vid 10 pvid untagged
$ bridge vlan add dev sw1p1 vid 10 untagged
Would keep the PVID set as 10, despite the flag being cleared. Fix this
by checking if we need to unset the PVID on vlan updates.
Fixes: a2482d2ce3 ("net: dsa: b53: Plug in VLAN support")
Signed-off-by: Jonas Gorski <jonas.gorski@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250429201710.330937-4-jonas.gorski@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
The Broadcom management header does not carry the original VLAN tag
state information, just the ingress port, so for untagged frames we do
not know from which VLAN they originated.
Therefore keep the CPU port always tagged except for VLAN 0.
Fixes the following setup:
$ ip link add br0 type bridge vlan_filtering 1
$ ip link set sw1p1 master br0
$ bridge vlan add dev br0 pvid untagged self
$ ip link add sw1p2.10 link sw1p2 type vlan id 10
Where VID 10 would stay untagged on the CPU port.
Fixes: 2c32a3d3c2 ("net: dsa: b53: Do not force CPU to be always tagged")
Signed-off-by: Jonas Gorski <jonas.gorski@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250429201710.330937-3-jonas.gorski@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
All modern chips support and need the 10_100 bit set for supporting jumbo
frames on 10/100 ports, so instead of enabling it only for 583XX enable
it for everything except bcm63xx, where the bit is writeable, but does
nothing.
Tested on BCM53115, where jumbo frames were dropped at 10/100 speeds
without the bit set.
Fixes: 6ae5834b98 ("net: dsa: b53: add MTU configuration support")
Signed-off-by: Jonas Gorski <jonas.gorski@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
While BCM5325/5365 do not support jumbo frames, they do support slightly
oversized frames, so do not error out if requesting a supported MTU for
them.
Fixes: 6ae5834b98 ("net: dsa: b53: add MTU configuration support")
Signed-off-by: Jonas Gorski <jonas.gorski@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
BCM5325/BCM5365 do not support jumbo frames, so we should not report a
jumbo frame mtu for them. But they do support so called "oversized"
frames up to 1536 bytes long by default, so report an appropriate MTU.
Fixes: 6ae5834b98 ("net: dsa: b53: add MTU configuration support")
Signed-off-by: Jonas Gorski <jonas.gorski@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
JMS_MAX_SIZE is the ethernet frame length, not the MTU, which is payload
without ethernet headers.
According to the datasheets maximum supported frame length for most
gigabyte swithes is 9720 bytes, so convert that to the expected MTU when
using VLAN tagged frames.
Fixes: 6ae5834b98 ("net: dsa: b53: add MTU configuration support")
Signed-off-by: Jonas Gorski <jonas.gorski@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
JMS_MIN_SIZE is the full ethernet frame length, while mtu is just the
data payload size. Comparing these two meant that mtus between 1500 and
1518 did not trigger enabling jumbo frames.
So instead compare the set mtu ETH_DATA_LEN, which is equal to
JMS_MIN_SIZE - ETH_HLEN - ETH_FCS_LEN;
Also do a check that the requested mtu is actually greater than the
minimum length, else we do not need to enable jumbo frames.
In practice this only introduced a very small range of mtus that did not
work properly. Newer chips allow 2000 byte large frames by default, and
older chips allow 1536 bytes long, which is equivalent to an mtu of
1514. So effectivly only mtus of 1515~1517 were broken.
Fixes: 6ae5834b98 ("net: dsa: b53: add MTU configuration support")
Signed-off-by: Jonas Gorski <jonas.gorski@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Broadcom switches supported by the b53 driver use a chip-wide jumbo frame
configuration. In the commit referenced with the Fixes tag, the setting
is applied just for the last port changing its MTU.
While configuring CPU ports accounts for tagger overhead, user ports do
not. When setting the MTU for a user port, the chip-wide setting is
reduced to not include the tagger overhead, resulting in an potentially
insufficient chip-wide maximum frame size for the CPU port.
As, by design, the CPU port MTU is adjusted for any user port change,
apply the chip-wide setting only for CPU ports. This aligns the driver
to the behavior of other switch drivers.
Fixes: 6ae5834b98 ("net: dsa: b53: add MTU configuration support")
Suggested-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Willi <martin@strongswan.org>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>