There are 43 instances of posix shell tests and 35 instances of bash. To
give us a single consistent language for testing in, replace
all #!/bin/sh to #!/bin/bash. Common sources that are included in both
different shells will now work as expected. And we no longer have to fix
up bashisms that appear to work when someone's system has sh symlinked
to bash, but don't work on other systems that have both shells
installed.
Although we could have chosen sh, it's not backwards compatible so it
wouldn't be possible to bulk convert without re-writing the existing
bash tests.
Choosing bash also gives us some nicer features including 'local'
variable definitions and regexes in if statements that are already
widely used in the tests.
It's not expected that there are any users with only sh available due to
the large number of bash tests that exist.
Discussed in relation to running shellcheck here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/e3751a74be34bbf3781c4644f518702a7270220b.1749785642.git.collin.funk1@gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Collin Funk <collin.funk1@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250623-james-perf-bash-tests-v1-1-f572f54d4559@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
The cpu-list part of this testcase has proven itself to be unreliable.
Sometimes, we get "<not counted>" for system.slice when pinned to CPUs
0 and 1. In such case, the test fails.
Since we cannot simply guarantee that any system.slice load will run
on any arbitrary list of CPUs, except the whole set of all CPUs, let's
rather remove the cpu-list subtest.
Fixes: a84260e314 ("perf test stat_bpf_counters_cgrp: Enhance perf stat cgroup BPF counter test")
Signed-off-by: Michael Petlan <mpetlan@redhat.com>
Cc: vmolnaro@redhat.com
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241101102812.576425-1-mpetlan@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Running shellcheck on lock_contention.sh generates below warning:
In stat_bpf_counters_cgrp.sh line 28:
if [ -d /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice -a -d /sys/fs/cgroup/user.slice ]; then
^-- SC2166 (warning): Prefer [ p ] && [ q ] as [ p -a q ] is not well defined.
In stat_bpf_counters_cgrp.sh line 34:
local self_cgrp=$(grep perf_event /proc/self/cgroup | cut -d: -f3)
^-------------^ SC3043 (warning): In POSIX sh, 'local' is undefined.
^-------^ SC2155 (warning): Declare and assign separately to avoid masking return values.
^-- SC2046 (warning): Quote this to prevent word splitting.
In stat_bpf_counters_cgrp.sh line 51:
local output
^----------^ SC3043 (warning): In POSIX sh, 'local' is undefined.
In stat_bpf_counters_cgrp.sh line 65:
local output
^----------^ SC3043 (warning): In POSIX sh, 'local' is undefined.
Fixed above warnings by:
- Changing the expression [p -a q] to [p] && [q].
- Fixing shellcheck warnings for local usage, by prefixing
function name to the variable.
Signed-off-by: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Disha Goel <disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230709182800.53002-6-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>