test may exit early because of missing program or not having required
feature before calling _prep_test(), then $UBLK_TMP isn't cleaned.
Fix it by moving creating $UBLK_TMP into _prep_test(), any resources
created since _prep_test() will be cleaned by _cleanup_test().
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250412023035.2649275-14-ming.lei@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Detach ublk daemon from the starting process completely by double-fork and
clearing its process group, so that `_add_ublk_dev` can return from sub-shell.
Then it is more friendly for writing shell test script for adding/recovering
ublk device.
Prepare for running ublk test in parallel.
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250412023035.2649275-5-ming.lei@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
block layer, ublk and io_uring might re-order IO in the past
- plug
- queue ublk io command via task work
Add one test for verifying if sequential WRITE IO is dispatched in order.
- null target is taken, so we can just observe io order from
`tracepoint:block:block_rq_complete` which represents the dispatch order
- WRITE IO is taken because READ may come from system-wide utility
Cc: Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250322093218.431419-2-ming.lei@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Add UBLK_TEST_QUIET, so we can print test result(PASS/SKIP/FAIL) only.
Also always run from test script's current directory, then the same test
script can be started from other work directory.
This way helps a lot to reuse this test source code and scripts for
other projects(liburing, blktests, ...)
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250303124324.3563605-12-ming.lei@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Add stress_test_01 for running IO vs. killing ublk server, so io_uring exit &
cancel code path can be covered, same with ublk's cancel code path.
Especially IO buffer lifetime is one big thing for ublk zero copy, the added
test can verify if this area works as expected.
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250303124324.3563605-11-ming.lei@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Move zero copy feature check into _add_ublk_dev() since we will have
more tests which requires to cover zero copy.
Then one check function of _check_add_dev() has to be added for dealing
with cleanup since '_add_ublk_dev()' is run in sub-shell, and we can't
exit from it to terminal shell.
Meantime always return error code from _add_ublk_dev().
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250303124324.3563605-8-ming.lei@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Both ublk driver and userspace heavily depends on io_uring subsystem,
and tools/testing/selftests/ should be the best place for holding this
cross-subsystem tests.
Add basic read/write IO test over this ublk null disk, and make sure ublk
working.
More tests will be added.
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250228161919.2869102-2-ming.lei@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
