The compatibles "ti,omap-sdma" and "ti,dra7-dma-crossbar" aren't documented
by a schema which causes warnings:
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/dma-controller.example.dtb: /example-0/dma-controller@48000000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['ti,omap-sdma']
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/dma-router.example.dtb: /example-0/dma-router@4a002b78: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['ti,dra7-dma-crossbar']
As no one has cared to fix them, just drop them.
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231122235050.2966280-1-robh@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
The 'phandle-array' type is a bit ambiguous. It can be either just an
array of phandles or an array of phandles plus args. Many schemas for
phandle-array properties aren't clear in the schema which case applies
though the description usually describes it.
The array of phandles case boils down to needing:
items:
maxItems: 1
The phandle plus args cases should typically take this form:
items:
- items:
- description: A phandle
- description: 1st arg cell
- description: 2nd arg cell
With this change, some examples need updating so that the bracketing of
property values matches the schema.
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Georgi Djakov <djakov@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220119015038.2433585-1-robh@kernel.org