The uncore code may not always be available (e.g. when we build the
display code with Xe), so we can't always rely on having the uncore's
spinlock.
To handle this, split the spin_lock/unlock_irqsave/restore() into
spin_lock/unlock() followed by a call to local_irq_save/restore() and
create wrapper functions for locking and unlocking the uncore's
spinlock. In these functions, we have a condition check and only
actually try to lock/unlock the spinlock when I915 is defined, and
thus uncore is available.
This keeps the ifdefs contained in these new functions and all such
logic inside the display code.
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrto.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231201100032.1367589-1-luciano.coelho@intel.com
Rename PIPECONF to TRANSCONF to make it clear what it actually
applies to.
While the usual convention is to pick the earliers name I think
in this case it's more clear to use the later name. Especially
as even the register offset is in the wrong range (0x70000 vs.
0x60000) and thus makes it look like this is per-pipe.
There is one place in gvt that's doing something with TRANSCONF
while iterating with for_each_pipe(). So that might not be doing
the right thing for TRANSCODER_EDP, dunno. Not knowing what it
does I left it as is to avoid breakage.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230213225258.2127-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
