Since the PCI IDs for PVC weren't added to the xe driver, the xe_wa
tests should not try to create a fake PVC device since they can't find
the right PCI ID. Fix bugs when running kunit:
# xe_wa_gt: ASSERTION FAILED at drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_wa_test.c:111
Expected ret == 0, but
ret == -19 (0xffffffffffffffed)
[FAILED] PVC (B0)
# xe_wa_gt: ASSERTION FAILED at drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_wa_test.c:111
Expected ret == 0, but
ret == -19 (0xffffffffffffffed)
[FAILED] PVC (B1)
# xe_wa_gt: ASSERTION FAILED at drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_wa_test.c:111
Expected ret == 0, but
ret == -19 (0xffffffffffffffed)
[FAILED] PVC (C0)
Fixes: dd08ebf6c3 ("drm/xe: Introduce a new DRM driver for Intel GPUs")
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240123031242.3548724-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
(cherry picked from commit ab5ae65fb2)
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
When built with W=1, the following warnings show up on modpost:
MODPOST drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Module.symvers
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_bo_test.o
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_dma_buf_test.o
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_migrate_test.o
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_pci_test.o
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_rtp_test.o
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_wa_test.o
Add the module description for each of these to fix the warning.
Reviewed-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231120221904.695630-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
In order to avoid mistakes when populating the workarounds, it's good to
be able to test if the entries added are all compatible for a certain
platform. The platform itself is not needed as long as we create fake
devices with enough configuration for the RTP helpers to process the
tables. Common mistakes that can be avoided:
- Entries clashing the bitfields being updated
- Register type being mixed (MCR vs regular / masked vs regular)
- Unexpected errors while adding the reg_sr entry
To test, inject a duplicate entry in gt_was, but with platform == tigerlake
rather than the currenct graphics version check:
{ XE_RTP_NAME("14011059788"),
XE_RTP_RULES(PLATFORM(TIGERLAKE)),
XE_RTP_ACTIONS(SET(GEN10_DFR_RATIO_EN_AND_CHICKEN, DFR_DISABLE))
},
This produces the following result:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run \
--kunitconfig drivers/gpu/drm/xe/.kunitconfig xe_wa
[14:18:02] Starting KUnit Kernel (1/1)...
[14:18:02] ============================================================
[14:18:02] ==================== xe_wa (1 subtest) =====================
[14:18:02] ======================== xe_wa_gt =========================
[14:18:02] [drm:xe_reg_sr_add] *ERROR* Discarding save-restore reg 9550 (clear: 00000200, set: 00000200, masked: no): ret=-22
[14:18:02] # xe_wa_gt: ASSERTION FAILED at drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_wa_test.c:116
[14:18:02] Expected gt->reg_sr.errors == 0, but
[14:18:02] gt->reg_sr.errors == 1 (0x1)
[14:18:02] [FAILED] TIGERLAKE (B0)
[14:18:02] [PASSED] DG1 (A0)
[14:18:02] [PASSED] DG1 (B0)
...
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230401085151.1786204-8-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
