Firmware used reg set 2 for tlb invalidation. AMDGPU can start from reg
set 3 to avoid the conflict. AMDKFD will use the reg set 0 or 1 when
necesary.
Signed-off-by: Shaoyun Liu <Shaoyun.Liu@amd.com>
Reviewws-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Some of these paths probably cannot be interrupted by a signal anyway.
Those that can would fail to clean up things if they actually got
interrupted.
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
the case could happen when gpu reset:
1. when gpu reset, cs can be continue until sw queue is full, then push job will wait with holding pd reservation.
2. gpu_reset routine will also need pd reservation to restore page table from their shadow.
3. cs is waiting for gpu_reset complete, but gpu reset is waiting for cs releases reservation.
v2: handle amdgpu_cs_submit error path.
Signed-off-by: Chunming Zhou <David1.Zhou@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Junwei Zhang <Jerry.Zhang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Monk Liu <monk.liu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
There is no good mechanism to handle the corresponding error.
When signal interrupt happens, unpin is not called.
As a result, inside AMDGPU, the statistic of pin size will be wrong.
Signed-off-by: Alex Xie <AlexBin.Xie@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Either in cgs functions or for callers of cgs functions:
1. The signal interrupt can affect the expected behaviour
2. There is no good mechanism to handle the corresponding error
3. There is no chance of deadlock in these single BO waiting
4. There is no clear benefit for interruptible waiting
5. Future caller of these functions might have same issue.
Signed-off-by: Alex Xie <AlexBin.Xie@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
1. The signal interrupt can affect the expected behaviour.
2. There is no good mechanism to handle the corresponding error.
When signal interrupt happens, unpin is not called.
As a result, inside AMDGPU, the statistic of pin size will be wrong.
Signed-off-by: Alex Xie <AlexBin.Xie@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
1. The signal interrupt can affect the expected behaviour.
2. There is no good mechanism to handle the corresponding error.
Signed-off-by: Alex Xie <AlexBin.Xie@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
1. The signal interrupt can affect the expected behaviour.
2. There is no good mechanism to handle the corresponding error.
Signed-off-by: Alex Xie <AlexBin.Xie@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
1. The signal interrupt can affect the expected behaviour.
2. There is no mechanism to handle the corresponding error.
Signed-off-by: Alex Xie <AlexBin.Xie@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[ 132.036658] amdgpu 0000:22:00.0: VM IB without ID
[ 132.036709] [drm:amdgpu_job_run [amdgpu]] *ERROR* Error scheduling IBs (-22)
[ 132.036755] [drm:amd_sched_main [amdgpu]] *ERROR* Failed to run job!
root cause is fence is signaled during sync transfer.
Signed-off-by: Chunming Zhou <David1.Zhou@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
BOs not mapped into the GART are always valuable for an eviction. Otherwise we
don't correctly swap them out on VRAM evictions during memory pressure.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Fix issue that PSP initialization will fail if reload amdgpu module.
That's because the PSP ring must be destroyed to be ready for the
next time PSP initialization.
Changes in v2:
- Move psp_ring_destroy before all BOs free (suggested by
Ray Huang).
Changes in v3:
- Check firmware load type, if it is not PSP, we should do
nothing in fw_fini(), and of course will not destroy
PSP ring too (suggested by Ray Huang).
Signed-off-by: Trigger Huang <trigger.huang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Xiangliang Yu <Xiangliang.Yu@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
if we set only lowest mclk level enabled,
when we enable uvd dpm during boot time,
mclk will be fixed in the lowest level.
the mclk switch will fail if try to enable
other level of mclk at this time.
so set all mclk levels enabled.
Signed-off-by: Rex Zhu <Rex.Zhu@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Based on commit "drm/radeon: remove useless and potentially wrong message".
The size of the info printing is incorrect and the PCI subsystems prints
the same info on boot anyway.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <funfunctor@folklore1984.net>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
The interrupt after FLR is missed sometimes due to hardware reason, so
guest driver get the notification of FLR completion via polling
message. Then host doesn't write VALID bit to avoid sending interrupt,
otherwise the completion will be handled twice.
So there's a valid message without VALID bit for FLR completion,
driver should handle it without checking.
Signed-off-by: Pixel Ding <Pixel.Ding@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Xiangliang Yu <Xiangliang.Yu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>