A common pattern is to create a locked bo, pin it without mapping
and then unlock it. Add a function to do that, which internally
uses xe_validation_guard().
With that we can remove xe_bo_create_locked_range() and add
exhaustive eviction to stolen, pf_provision_vf_lmem and
psmi_alloc_object.
v4:
- New patch after reorganization.
v5:
- Replace DRM_XE_GEM_CPU_CACHING_WB with 0. (CI)
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250908101246.65025-13-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
We want all validation (potential backing store allocation) to be part
of a drm_exec transaction. Therefore add a drm_exec pointer argument
to xe_bo_validate() and ___xe_bo_create_locked(). Upcoming patches
will deal with making all (or nearly all) calls to these functions
part of a drm_exec transaction. In the meantime, define special values
of the drm_exec pointer:
XE_VALIDATION_UNIMPLEMENTED: Implementation of the drm_exec transaction
has not been done yet.
XE_VALIDATION_UNSUPPORTED: Some Middle-layers (dma-buf) doesn't allow
the drm_exec context to be passed down to map_attachment where
validation takes place.
XE_VALIDATION_OPT_OUT: May be used only for kunit tests where exhaustive
eviction isn't crucial and the ROI of converting those is very
small.
For XE_VALIDATION_UNIMPLEMENTED and XE_VALIDATION_OPT_OUT there is also
a lockdep check that a drm_exec transaction can indeed start at the
location where the macro is expanded. This is to encourage
developers to take this into consideration early in the code
development process.
v2:
- Fix xe_vm_set_validation_exec() imbalance. Add an assert that
hopefully catches future instances of this (Matt Brost)
v3:
- Extend to psmi_alloc_object
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> #v3
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250908101246.65025-2-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
The compat i915_drv.h contains things that aren't there in the original
i915_drv.h. Split out gem/i915_gem_object.h and i915_scheduler_types.h,
moving the corresponding pieces out, including FORCEWAKE_ALL to
intel_uncore.h.
Technically I915_PRIORITY_DISPLAY should be in i915_priolist_types.h,
but it's a bit overkill to split out another file just for
that. i915_scheduler_types.h shall do.
With this, the compat i915_drv.h becomes a strict subset of the
original.
Reviewed-by: Nemesa Garg <nemesa.garg@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/d6bd95bf52aa37f48ddec3e675b7a3cc66829eef.1741192597.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
[Jani: fix i915_gem_object.h header guard while applying]
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
shmem ensures the memory is cleared on allocation, however here we are
using TTM, which doesn't natively support shmem (other than for swap),
but instead just allocates normal system memory. And we only zero such
memory for userspace allocations. In the case of intel_fbdev we are
missing the memset_io() since display path incorrectly thinks object is
shmem based.
Fixes: 44e694958b ("drm/xe/display: Implement display support")
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240205153110.38340-2-matthew.auld@intel.com
readq() is not available in 32bits and i915_gem_object_read_from_page()
is supposed to allow reading arbitrary sizes determined by the `size`
argument. Currently the only caller only passes a size == 8 so the
second problem is not that big. Migrate to calling
memcpy()/memcpy_fromio() to allow possible changes in the display side
and to fix the build on 32b architectures.
v2: Use memcpy/memcpy_fromio directly rather than using iosys-map with
the same size == 8 bytes restriction (Matt Roper)
Fixes: 44e694958b ("drm/xe/display: Implement display support")
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240119001612.2991381-4-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Xe is not carrying frontbuffer pointer in xe_bo. Define it's getter as
NULL. Setter simply returns pointer which was provided as a
parameter.
v3: Do not take any references
v2: Handle xe_bo_put as well
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
As for display, the intent is to share the display code with the i915
driver so that there is maximum reuse there.
We do this by recompiling i915/display code twice.
Now that i915 has been adapted to support the Xe build, we can add
the xe/display support.
This initial work is a collaboration of many people and unfortunately
this squashed patch won't fully honor the proper credits.
But let's try to add a few from the squashed patches:
Co-developed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
Co-developed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
