Since we don't do mailbox updates the push send bit
should alwyas clear by the time the delay vblank fires
and the flip completes. Check for that to make sure we
haven't screwed up the sequencing/vblank evasion/etc.
On the DSB path we should be able to guarantee this
since we don't have to deal with any scheduler latencies
and whatnot. I suppose unexpected DMA/memory latencies
might be the only thing that might trip us up here.
For the MMIO path we do always have a non-zero chance
that vblank evasion fails (since we can't really guarantee
anything about the scheduling behaviour). That could trip
up this check, but that seems fine since we already print
errors for other types of vblank evasion failures.
Should the CPU vblank evasion actually fail, then the push
send bit can still be set when the next commit happens. But
both the DSB and MMIO paths should handle that situation
gracefully.
v2: Only check once instead of polling for two scanlines
since we should now be guaranteed to be past the
delayed vblank.
Also check in the MMIO path for good measure
v3: Skip the push send check when VRR is disabled.
With joiner the secondary pipe's DSBs doen't have access
to the transcoder registers, and so doing this check
there triggers a reponse timeout error on the DSB. VRR
is not currently allowed when using joiner, so this will
prevent the bogus register access.
Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250210160711.24010-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
vrr.vsync_{start,end} computation should not depend on
crtc_state->vrr.enable.
--v1:
- Explain commit message more clearly [Jani]
- Instead of tweaking to fastset use vrr.flipline while computing AS_SDP.
--v2:
- Correct computation of vrr.vsync_start/end should not depend on
vrr.enable.[ville]
- vrr enable disable requirement should not obstruct by SDP enable
disable requirements. [Ville]
--v3:
- Create separate patch for crtc_state_dump [Ankit].
--v4:
- Update commit message and header [Ankit].
Signed-off-by: Mitul Golani <mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250130051609.1796524-3-mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com
On ICL/TGL the VRR hardware injects an extra scanline just after
vactive. This essentically behaves the same as an extra line of
vblank delay, except it only appears in this one specific spot.
Consider our DSB interrupt signalling scheme:
1. arm the update
2. wait for undelayed vblank (or rather safe window with VRR)
3. wait for enough usecs to get past the delayed vblank
4. signal interrupt to indicate that arming has latched
If step 2 waits for end of vactive step 3 needs to account for
the extra one scanline, or else we risk signalling the interrupt
before the delayed vblank has actually elapsed. So include the
extra scanline in our vblank delay estimates.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241210211007.5976-16-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Compute Fixed Average Vtotal/CMRR with resepect to
userspace VRR enablement. Also calculate required
parameters in case of CMRR is enabled. During
intel_vrr_compute_config, CMRR is getting enabled
based on userspace has enabled Variable refresh mode
with VRR timing generator or not. Make CMRR as small subset of
FAVT mode, when Panel is running on Fixed refresh rate
and on VRR framework then only enable CMRR to match with
actual refresh rate.
--v2:
- Update is_cmrr_frac_required function return as bool, not int. [Jani]
- Use signed int math instead of unsigned in cmrr_get_vtotal2. [Jani]
- Fix typo and usage of camel case in cmrr_get_vtotal. [Jani]
- Use do_div in cmrr_get_vtotalwhile calculating cmrr_m. [ Jani]
- Simplify cmrr and vrr compute config in intel_vrr_compute_config. [Jani]
- Correct valiable name usage in is_cmrr_frac_required. [Ville]
--v3:
- Removing RFC tag.
--v4:
- Added edp check to address edp usecase for now. (ville)
- Updated is_cmrr_fraction_required to more simplified calculation.
- on longterm goal to be worked upon uapi as suggestion from ville.
--v5:
- Correct vtotal paramas accuracy and add 2 digit precision.
- Avoid using DIV_ROUND_UP and improve scanline precision.
--v6:
- Make CMRR a small subset of FAVT mode.
--v7:
- Update commit message to avoid confusion with Legacy VRR (Ankit).
- Add cmrr.enable in last, so remove from this patch.
--v8:
- Set cmrr.enable in current patch instead of separate patch (Ankit).
- Since vrr.enable and cmrr.enable are not mutually exclusive,
handle accordingly (Ankit).
- is_edp is not required inside is_cmrr_frac_required function (Ankit).
- Add video_mode_required flag for future enhancement.
- Correct cmrr_m/cmrr_n calculation.
--v9:
- Move patch to last and set other bits before computing
cmrr.enable.(Ankit)
- Add TODO: for to address target refresh rate precision as future
enhancement.
Signed-off-by: Mitul Golani <mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240610072203.24956-10-mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com
Add/update trans_vrr_ctl flag when crtc_state->cmrr.enable
is set, With this commit setting the stage for subsequent
CMRR enablement.
--v2:
- Check pipe active state in cmrr enabling. [Jani]
- Remove usage of bitwise OR on booleans. [Jani]
- Revert unrelated changes. [Jani]
- Update intel_vrr_enable, vrr and cmrr enable conditions. [Jani]
- Simplify whole if-ladder in intel_vrr_enable. [Jani]
- Revert patch restructuring mistakes in intel_vrr_get_config. [Jani]
--v3:
- Check pipe active state in cmrr disabling.[Jani]
- Correct messed up condition in intel_vrr_enable. [Jani]
--v4:
- Removing RFC tag.
--v5:
- CMRR handling in co-existatnce of LRR and DRRS.
--v7:
- Rebase on top of AS SDP merge.
--v8:
- Remove cmrr_enabling/disabling and update commit message. (Ankit)
--v9:
- Revert removed line(Ankit).
Signed-off-by: Mitul Golani <mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240610072203.24956-5-mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com
Add register definitions for Transcoder Fixed Average
Vtotal mode/CMRR function, with the necessary bitfields.
Compute these registers when CMRR is enabled, extending
Adaptive refresh rate capabilities.
--v2:
- Use intel_de_read64_2x32 in intel_vrr_get_config. [Jani]
- Fix indent and order based on register offset. [Jani]
--v3:
- Removing RFC tag.
--v4:
- Update place holder for CMRR register definition. (Jani)
--v5:
- Add CMRR register definitions to a separate file intel_vrr_reg.h.
--v6:
- Fixed indentation. (Jani)
- Add dependency header intel_display_reg_defs.h. (Jani)
- Rename file name to intel_vrr_regs.h instead of reg.h (Jani)
--v7:
- Remove adding CMRR flag to vrr_ctl register during set_transcoder_timing,
as it is already being done during intel_vrr_enable. (Ankit)
Signed-off-by: Mitul Golani <mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240610072203.24956-4-mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com
Compute vrr_vsync_start/end, which sets the position
for hardware to send the Vsync at a fixed position
relative to the end of the Vblank.
--v2:
- Updated VSYNC_START/END macros to VRR_VSYNC_START/END. (Ankit)
- Updated bit fields of VRR_VSYNC_START/END. (Ankit)
--v3:
- Add PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(vrr.vsync_start/end).
- Read/write vrr_vsync params only when we intend to send
adaptive_sync sdp.
--v4:
- Use VRR_SYNC_START/END macros correctly.
--v5:
- Send AS SDP only when VRR is enabled.
--v6:
- Add TRANS_VRR_VSYNC before enabling VRR as per bspec. (Ankit)
Signed-off-by: Mitul Golani <mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240322031157.3823909-9-mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com
Implement low refresh rate (LRR) where we change the vblank
length by hand as requested, but otherwise keep the timing
generator running in non-VRR mode (ie. fixed refresh rate).
The panel itself must support VRR for this to work, and
only TGL+ has the double buffred TRANS_VTOTAL.VTOTAL that
we need to make the switch properly. The double buffer
latching happens at the start of transcoders undelayed
vblank. The other thing that we change is
TRANS_VBLANK.VBLANK_END but the hardware entirely ignores
that in DP mode. But I decided to keep writing it anyway
just to avoid more special cases in readout/state check.
v2: Document that TRANS_VBLANK.VBLANK_END is ignored by
the hardware
v3: Reconcile with VRR fastset
Adjust update_lrr flag behaviour
Make sure timings stay within VRR range
v4: Fix up update_m_n vs. update_lrr rebase fail (Manasi)
Drop DOUBLE_BUFFER_VACTIVE define as it's not needed (Manasi)
TODO: Hook LRR into the automatic DRRS downclocking stuff?
Cc: Manasi Navare <navaremanasi@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230915103800.14218-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <navaremanasi@chromium.org>
Move VRR enabling/disabling into a place where it also works
for fastsets.
With this we always start the transcoder up in non-VRR mode.
Granted we already did that but for a very short period of
time. But now that we might end up doing a bit more with the
transcoder in non-VRR mode it seems prudent to also update
the active timings as the transcoder changes its operating
mode.
crtc_state->vrr.enable still tracks whether VRR is actually
enabled or not, but now we configure all the other VRR timing
registers whenever VRR is possible (whether we actually enable
it or not). crtc_state->vrr.flipline can now serve as our
"is VRR possible" bit of state.
I decided to leave the MSA timing ignore bit set all the time
whether VRR is actually enabled or not. If the sink can figure
out the timings with that information when VRR is active then
surely it can also do it when VRR is inactive.
v2: Protect intel_vrr_set_transcoder_timings() with HAS_VRR()
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230321135615.27338-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Mitul Golani <mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com>
On mtl (at least) clearing the guardband bits in the same write
as the enable bit gets cleared seems to cause an immediate FIFO
underrun. Thus is seems that we need to first clear just the
enable bit, then wait for the VRR live status to indicate the
transcoder has exited VRR mode (this step is documented in Bspec
as well), and finally we can clear out the rest of the TRANS_VRR_CTL
for good measure.
I did this without any RMWs in case we want to toggle VRR on/off
via DSB in the future, and as we know DSB can't read registers.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221202134412.21943-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
We are miscalculating both the guardband value, and the resulting
vblank exit length on adl+. This means that our start of vblank
(double buffered register latch point) is incorrect, and we also
think that it's not where it actually is (hence vblank evasion/etc.
may not work properly). Fix up the calculations to match the real
hardware behaviour (as reverse engineered by intel_display_poller).
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221202134412.21943-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Account for the framestart delay when calculating the "pipeline full"
value for icl/tgl vrr. This puts the start of vblank (ie. where the
double bufferd registers get latched) to a consistent place regardless
of what framestart delay value is used. framestart delay does not
change where start of vblank occurs in non-vrr mode and I can't see
any reason why we'd want different behaviour in vrr mode.
Currently framestart delay is always set to 1, and the hardcoded 4
scanlines in the code means we're currently delaying the start of
vblank by three extra lines. And with framestart delay set to 4 we'd
have no extra delay.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221202134412.21943-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Turns out many of the files that need i915_reg.h get it implicitly via
{display/intel_de.h, gt/intel_context.h} -> i915_trace.h -> i915_irq.h
-> i915_reg.h. Since i915_trace.h doesn't actually need i915_irq.h,
makes sense to drop it, but that requires adding quite a few new
includes all over the place.
Prefer including i915_reg.h where needed instead of adding another
implicit include, because eventually we'll want to split up i915_reg.h
and only include the specific registers at each place.
Also some places actually needed i915_irq.h too.
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/6e78a2e0ac1bffaf5af3b5ccc21dff05e6518cef.1668008071.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
