We previously assumed that the values "2" and "4" were new in DCB 4.1,
however, there's at least one GM107 DCB 4.0 board (Quadro K620) that
uses the newer values.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
No known VBIOSes use these, but they are present in the actual VBIOS
table parsing logic. No harm in adding these too.
Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
According to the tstate calculation in nvkm_clk_tstate(),
the range of tstate is from -(clk->state_nr - 1) to 0,
it mean the tstate is negative value. But in nvkm_pstate_work(),
it use (clk->state_nr - 1 - clk->tstate) to limit pstate,
it's not correct.
This patch fix it to use (clk->state_nr - 1 + clk->tstate) to
limit pstate.
Signed-off-by: Wei Ni <wni@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Tested on a few cards. Probably works quite well for most, given they should
all be GDDR3.
Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <rspliet@eclipso.eu>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
This looks surprisingly similar to scripts on earlier cards as well
but they don't seem to work just yet. That... and I don't have any, which
makes it a tough job to reverse engineer.
Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <rspliet@eclipso.eu>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Some of the bits in there are similar to the bits in the gt215 rammap.
Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <rspliet@eclipso.eu>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Might need some generalisation to < GT200. For those: use at your own risk!
Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <rspliet@eclipso.eu>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
In preparation of NV50 reclocking, where there is no version
Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <rspliet@eclipso.eu>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Opcode 0x5a is a register write for data looked up from another part of
the VBIOS image. 0x59 is a more complex opcode, but we may as well
recognize it. These occur on a single known instance of Riva TNT2
hardware.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91025
Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Increase clock timeout for SYS, FPB and GPC in order to avoid operation
failure at high gpcclk rate.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
nvbios_extend() returns 1 to indicate "extended the array" and 0 to
indicate the array is already big enough. This is used by the core
shadowing code to prevent re-fetching chunks of the image that have
already been shadowed.
The ACPI fetching code may possibly need to extend this further due
to requiring fetches to happen in 4KiB chunks.
Under certain circumstances (that happen if the total image size is
a multiple of 4KiB), the memory allocated to store the shadow will
already be big enough, causing the ACPI code's nvbios_extend() call
to return 0, which is misinterpreted as a failure.
The fix is simple, accept >= 0 as a successful condition here. The
core will have already made sure that we're not re-fetching data we
already have.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89047
v2 (Ben Skeggs):
- dropped hunk which would cause unnecessary re-fetching
- more descriptive explanation
Signed-off-by: Jan Vesely <jano.vesely@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Make static a few functions and structures that should be.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Before we moved gk110's implementation of this to pmu, the functions were
identical. This commit just switches GK208 to use the new (more complete)
implementation of the power-up sequence.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Turns out the PTHERM part of this dance is bracketed by the same PMU
fiddling that occurs on GK104/6, let's assume it's also PGOB.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
If a memory allocation fails when using the DMA allocator,
gk20a_instobj_dtor_dma() will be called on the failed instmem object.
At this time, node->handle might not be NULL despite the call to
dma_alloc_attrs() having failed. node->cpuaddr is the right member to
check for such a failure, so use it instead.
Reported-by: Vince Hsu <vinceh@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Let GK20A's instmem take advantage of the IOMMU if it is present. Having
an IOMMU means that instmem is no longer allocated using the DMA API,
but instead obtained through page_alloc and made contiguous to the GPU
by IOMMU mappings.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
instmem for GK20A is allocated using dma_alloc_coherent(), which
provides us with a coherent CPU mapping that we never use because
instmem objects are accessed through PRAMIN. Switch to
dma_alloc_attrs() which gives us the option to dismiss that CPU mapping
and free up some CPU virtual space.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Now that Nouveau can operate even when there is no RAM device, remove
the dummy one used by GK20A.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
GK20A does not have dedicated RAM, thus having a RAM device for it does
not make sense. Move the contiguous physical memory allocation to
instmem.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Having a RAM device does not make sense for chips like GK20A which have
no dedicated video memory. The dummy RAM device that we used so far
works as a temporary band-aid, but in the longer term it is desirable
for the driver to be able to work without any kind of VRAM.
This patch adds a few conditionals in places where a RAM device was
assumed to be present and allows some more objects to be allocated from
the TT domain, allowing Nouveau to handle GPUs for which
pfb->ram == NULL.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
This if statement is correct but it wasn't indented, so it looked like
some code was missing.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Code before looked only at bit 31 to decide if a port is unused.
However dcb 4.1 spec says 0x1F in bits 31-27 and 26-22 means unused.
This fixed hdmi monitor detection on GM206.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
The namespace of NVKM is being changed to nvkm_ instead of nouveau_,
which will be used for the DRM part of the driver. This is being
done in order to make it very clear as to what part of the driver a
given symbol belongs to, and as a minor step towards splitting the
DRM driver out to be able to stand on its own (for virt).
Because there's already a large amount of churn here anyway, this is
as good a time as any to also switch to NVIDIA's device and chipset
naming to ease collaboration with them.
A comparison of objdump disassemblies proves no code changes.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
The namespace of NVKM is being changed to nvkm_ instead of nouveau_,
which will be used for the DRM part of the driver. This is being
done in order to make it very clear as to what part of the driver a
given symbol belongs to, and as a minor step towards splitting the
DRM driver out to be able to stand on its own (for virt).
Because there's already a large amount of churn here anyway, this is
as good a time as any to also switch to NVIDIA's device and chipset
naming to ease collaboration with them.
A comparison of objdump disassemblies proves no code changes.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
The namespace of NVKM is being changed to nvkm_ instead of nouveau_,
which will be used for the DRM part of the driver. This is being
done in order to make it very clear as to what part of the driver a
given symbol belongs to, and as a minor step towards splitting the
DRM driver out to be able to stand on its own (for virt).
Because there's already a large amount of churn here anyway, this is
as good a time as any to also switch to NVIDIA's device and chipset
naming to ease collaboration with them.
A comparison of objdump disassemblies proves no code changes.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
The namespace of NVKM is being changed to nvkm_ instead of nouveau_,
which will be used for the DRM part of the driver. This is being
done in order to make it very clear as to what part of the driver a
given symbol belongs to, and as a minor step towards splitting the
DRM driver out to be able to stand on its own (for virt).
Because there's already a large amount of churn here anyway, this is
as good a time as any to also switch to NVIDIA's device and chipset
naming to ease collaboration with them.
A comparison of objdump disassemblies proves no code changes.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
The namespace of NVKM is being changed to nvkm_ instead of nouveau_,
which will be used for the DRM part of the driver. This is being
done in order to make it very clear as to what part of the driver a
given symbol belongs to, and as a minor step towards splitting the
DRM driver out to be able to stand on its own (for virt).
Because there's already a large amount of churn here anyway, this is
as good a time as any to also switch to NVIDIA's device and chipset
naming to ease collaboration with them.
A comparison of objdump disassemblies proves no code changes.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
The namespace of NVKM is being changed to nvkm_ instead of nouveau_,
which will be used for the DRM part of the driver. This is being
done in order to make it very clear as to what part of the driver a
given symbol belongs to, and as a minor step towards splitting the
DRM driver out to be able to stand on its own (for virt).
Because there's already a large amount of churn here anyway, this is
as good a time as any to also switch to NVIDIA's device and chipset
naming to ease collaboration with them.
A comparison of objdump disassemblies proves no code changes.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
The namespace of NVKM is being changed to nvkm_ instead of nouveau_,
which will be used for the DRM part of the driver. This is being
done in order to make it very clear as to what part of the driver a
given symbol belongs to, and as a minor step towards splitting the
DRM driver out to be able to stand on its own (for virt).
Because there's already a large amount of churn here anyway, this is
as good a time as any to also switch to NVIDIA's device and chipset
naming to ease collaboration with them.
A comparison of objdump disassemblies proves no code changes.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
The namespace of NVKM is being changed to nvkm_ instead of nouveau_,
which will be used for the DRM part of the driver. This is being
done in order to make it very clear as to what part of the driver a
given symbol belongs to, and as a minor step towards splitting the
DRM driver out to be able to stand on its own (for virt).
Because there's already a large amount of churn here anyway, this is
as good a time as any to also switch to NVIDIA's device and chipset
naming to ease collaboration with them.
A comparison of objdump disassemblies proves no code changes.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
The namespace of NVKM is being changed to nvkm_ instead of nouveau_,
which will be used for the DRM part of the driver. This is being
done in order to make it very clear as to what part of the driver a
given symbol belongs to, and as a minor step towards splitting the
DRM driver out to be able to stand on its own (for virt).
Because there's already a large amount of churn here anyway, this is
as good a time as any to also switch to NVIDIA's device and chipset
naming to ease collaboration with them.
A comparison of objdump disassemblies proves no code changes.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
The namespace of NVKM is being changed to nvkm_ instead of nouveau_,
which will be used for the DRM part of the driver. This is being
done in order to make it very clear as to what part of the driver a
given symbol belongs to, and as a minor step towards splitting the
DRM driver out to be able to stand on its own (for virt).
Because there's already a large amount of churn here anyway, this is
as good a time as any to also switch to NVIDIA's device and chipset
naming to ease collaboration with them.
A comparison of objdump disassemblies proves no code changes.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
The namespace of NVKM is being changed to nvkm_ instead of nouveau_,
which will be used for the DRM part of the driver. This is being
done in order to make it very clear as to what part of the driver a
given symbol belongs to, and as a minor step towards splitting the
DRM driver out to be able to stand on its own (for virt).
Because there's already a large amount of churn here anyway, this is
as good a time as any to also switch to NVIDIA's device and chipset
naming to ease collaboration with them.
A comparison of objdump disassemblies proves no code changes.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
The namespace of NVKM is being changed to nvkm_ instead of nouveau_,
which will be used for the DRM part of the driver. This is being
done in order to make it very clear as to what part of the driver a
given symbol belongs to, and as a minor step towards splitting the
DRM driver out to be able to stand on its own (for virt).
Because there's already a large amount of churn here anyway, this is
as good a time as any to also switch to NVIDIA's device and chipset
naming to ease collaboration with them.
A comparison of objdump disassemblies proves no code changes.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
