Minor clean up, there is no need to assign result to zero, then
check if it is less than zero. Just return SUCCESS.
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The retval status checks in the proceeding do loop return out
of function ms_read_attritbute_info if there is an error
condition, thus we never reach the end of the loop with
retval failed status. Therefore, the retval status check
at end of the do loop is redundant and can be removed.
Detected with CoverityScan, CID#143000 ("Logically dead code")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
'cb' and 'sgb' were assigned __le values but were not marked as such,
this fixes the following sparse warnings:
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_transport.c:220:34: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_transport.c:220:34: expected unsigned int [unsigned] [usertype] <noident>
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_transport.c:220:34: got restricted __le32 [usertype] <noident>
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_transport.c:319:44: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_transport.c:319:44: expected unsigned long long [unsigned] [long] [long long] [usertype] <noident>
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_transport.c:319:44: got restricted __le64 [usertype] <noident>
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_transport.c:319:44: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_transport.c:319:44: expected unsigned long long [unsigned] [long] [long long] [usertype] <noident>
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_transport.c:319:44: got restricted __le64 [usertype] <noident>
Signed-off-by: Omri Arad <omriarad3@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
sizeof() when applied to a pointer typed expression gives the
size of the pointer, not that of the pointed data.
Fixes: 2eb9d8cbb3 ("staging: rts5208: rtsx.c: Alloc sizeof struct")
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Line goes too long when aligned with parenthesis, so moved to a new line
Signed-off-by: Wayne Porter <wporter82@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Fix lines that go over 80 characters to stop warnings from checkpatch
Signed-off-by: Wayne Porter <wporter82@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Move comments above long definitions so they don't go over 80 characters
Signed-off-by: Wayne Porter <wporter82@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Aligning with parenthesis causes lines to go too long, so the
parenthesis are on a new line
Signed-off-by: Wayne Porter <wporter82@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Adding space around operator for better readability and to stop
checkpatch check messages
Signed-off-by: Wayne Porter <wporter82@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Replace all instances of (1 << x) with BIT(x) to satisfy checkpatch
check messages
Signed-off-by: Wayne Porter <wporter82@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Braces should be around every part of the if block and not just the else
if
Signed-off-by: Wayne Porter <wporter82@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Assign values to variables on their own lines instead of using multiple
assignment
Signed-off-by: Wayne Porter <wporter82@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Searched the entire kernel for any references to this function and it
appears safe to fix the typo
Signed-off-by: Wayne Porter <wporter82@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cleanup of &(chip->sd_card) to remove parentheses where they are not
needed
Signed-off-by: Wayne Porter <wporter82@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Problem found using checkpatch.pl
CHECK: Unnecessary parentheses around dev->dev_mutex
Signed-off-by: Dilek Uzulmez <dilekuzulmez@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
