The return code from ->get_max_state() callback was not checked during
binding cooling device to thermal zone device.
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Before this change it was only possible to set get_temp() and get_trend()
methods to be used in the common code handling passing parameters via
device tree to "cpu-thermal" CPU thermal zone device.
Now it is possible to also set emulated value of temperature for debug
purposes.
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
This patch extends the of-thermal.c to export trip points for a given
thermal zone.
Thermal drivers should use of_thermal_get_trip_points() method to get
pointer to table of thermal trip points.
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
This patch changes name of struct __thermal_trip to thermal_trip and moves
declaration of the latter to ./include/linux/thermal.h for better visibility.
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
This patch extends the of-thermal.c to provide check if trip point is
valid.
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
This patch extends the of-thermal.c to provide information about number of
available trip points.
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Adding my copyright information for two purposes:
- To get cc'd for future patches to review (Only if people read this header
while sending mail)
- Have done enough changes to earn a place here?
Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
get_property() was an over complicated beast with BUGs. It used to believe that
cpufreq table is present in ascending or descending order, which might not
always be true.
Previous patch has created another freq table in descending order for us and we
better use it now. With that get_property() simply goes away and another helper
get_level() comes in.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
CPUFreq framework *doesn't* guarantee that frequencies present in cpufreq table
will be in ascending or descending order. But cpu_cooling somehow assumes that.
Probably because most of current users are creating this list from DT, which is
done with the help of OPP layer. And OPP layer creates the list in ascending
order of frequencies.
But cpu_cooling can be used for other platforms too, which don't have
frequencies arranged in any order.
This patch tries to fix this issue by creating another list of valid frequencies
in descending order. Care is also taken to throw warnings for duplicate entries.
Later patches would use it to simplify code.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
We already know the value of 'cpufreq_dev->max_level' and so there is no need
calculating that once again. For this, we need to send 'cpufreq_dev' to
get_property().
Make all necessary changes for this change. Because cpufreq_cooling_get_level()
doesn't have access to 'cpufreq_dev', it is updated to iterate over the list of
cpufreq_cooling_devices to get cooling device for the cpu number passed to it.
This also makes it robust to return levels only for the CPU registered via a
cooling device. We don't have to support anything that isn't registered yet.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
As we already have a list of cpufreq_cooling_devices now, lets use it instead of
a local counter.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
We don't use get_property() to find max levels anymore as it is done at boot
now. So, don't support GET_MAXL in get_property().
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
CPU frequency tables don't update after the driver is registered and so we don't
need to iterate over them to find total number of states every time
cpufreq_get_max_state() is called. Do it once at boot time.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
get_cpu_frequency() isn't doing much by itself, just calling get_property(). And
so this wrapper isn't required at all. Get rid of it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
cpufreq_apply_cooling() has a single caller, cpufreq_set_cur_state() and
cpufreq_set_cur_state() is an unnecessary wrapper over cpufreq_apply_cooling().
Get rid of it by merging both routines.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
There is no point checking for validity of 'cpufreq_val' from
cpufreq_thermal_notifier() every time the routine is called. Its guaranteed to
be 0 on the first call but will be valid otherwise.
Lets update it once while the device registers.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Because get_cpu_frequency() has returned a valid frequency, it means that the
cpufreq policy is surely valid and so no point checking that again with
is_cpufreq_valid(). Get rid of the routine as well as there are no more users.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
All CPUs present in 'allowed_cpus' share the same 'struct cpufreq_policy'
structure and so calling cpufreq_update_policy() for each of them doesn't make
sense.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
In __cpufreq_cooling_register() we try to match min/max frequencies for all CPUs
passed in 'clip_cpus' mask. This mask is the cpumask of cpus where the frequency
constraints will be applied.
Same frequency constraint can be applied only to the CPUs belonging to the same
cluster (i.e. CPUs sharing clock line). For all such CPUs we have a single
'struct cpufreq_policy' structure managing them and so getting policies for all
CPUs wouldn't make any sense as they will all return the same pointer.
So, remove this useless check of checking min/max for all CPUs. Also update doc
comment to make this more obvious that clip_cpus should be same as
policy->related_cpus.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
We aren't supposed to return our own error type here. Return what we got.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
ret is initialized before it is used, so no need to set it to 0 in its declaration.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
This wasn't explained well anywhere and should be clearly specified. Lets add a
top level comment for this.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
cooling_cpufreq_lock isn't used to protect this structure and so the comment
over it is outdated. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
cpufreq_cooling_register() expects mask of all the CPUs where frequency
constraint is applicable.
This platform has more than one CPU to which these constraints will apply and so
passing mask of only CPU0 wouldn't be sufficient. Also, this platform has a
single cluster of CPUs and the constraint applies to all CPUs.
If CPU0 is hoplugged out then we may face strange BUGs as cpu_cooling framework
isn't aware of any siblings sharing clock line.
Fix it by passing cpu_present_mask to cpufreq_cooling_register().
Cc: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Cc: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
cpufreq_cooling_register() expects mask of all the CPUs where frequency
constraint is applicable.
This platform has more than one CPU to which these constraints will apply and so
passing mask of only CPU0 wouldn't be sufficient. Also, this platform has a
single cluster of CPUs and the constraint applies to all CPUs.
If CPU0 is hoplugged out then we may face strange BUGs as cpu_cooling framework
isn't aware of any siblings sharing clock line.
Fix it by passing cpu_present_mask to cpufreq_cooling_register().
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
cpufreq_cooling_register() expects mask of all the CPUs where frequency
constraint is applicable.
This platform has more than one CPU to which these constraints will apply and so
passing mask of only CPU0 wouldn't be sufficient. Also, this platform has a
single cluster of CPUs and the constraint applies to all CPUs.
If CPU0 is hoplugged out then we may face strange BUGs as cpu_cooling framework
isn't aware of any siblings sharing clock line.
Fix it by passing cpu_present_mask to cpufreq_cooling_register().
Cc: Hongbo Zhang <hongbo.zhang@linaro.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Currently, userspace can request a governor change while the governor
itself is running. Grab the thermal zone lock when changing the
governor to prevent this race.
Signed-off-by: Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Ignore invalid trip temperature less or equal to zero. Some
buggy systems have invalid trips, causing system shutdown.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Thermal is TS-ADC Controller module supports
user-defined mode and automatic mode.
User-defined mode refers,TSADC all the control signals entirely by
software writing to register for direct control.
Automaic mode refers to the module automatically poll TSADC output,
and the results were checked.If you find that the temperature High
in a period of time,an interrupt is generated to the processor
down-measures taken;If the temperature over a period of time High,
the resulting TSHUT gave CRU module,let it reset the entire chip,
or via GPIO give PMIC.
Signed-off-by: zhaoyifeng <zyf@rock-chips.com>
Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <caesar.wang@rock-chips.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
The functions cpufreq_cooling_unregister() and thermal_zone_device_unregister()
test whether their argument is NULL and then return immediately.
Thus the test around the call is not needed.
This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Prevents build warning:
st_thermal.c:278:12:
warning: ‘st_thermal_suspend’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
st_thermal.c:286:12:
warning: ‘st_thermal_resume’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
Acked-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@st.com>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Existing code updates cupfreq policy only while executing
cpufreq_apply_cooling() function (i.e. when notify_device != NOTIFY_INVALID).
It doesn't apply constraints when cpufreq policy update happens from any other
place but it should update the cpufreq policy with thermal constraints every
time when there is a cpufreq policy update, to keep state of
cpufreq_cooling_device and max_feq of cpufreq policy in sync. For instance
while resuming cpufreq updates cpufreq_policy and it restores default
policy->usr_policy values irrespective of cooling device's cpufreq_state since
notification gets missed because (notify_device == NOTIFY_INVALID).
Another problem, is that userspace is able to change max_freq irrespective of
cooling device's state, as notification gets missed.
This patch modifies code to maintain a global cpufreq_dev_list and applies
constraints of all matching cooling devices for policy's cpu when there is any
policy update(ends up applying the lowest max_freq among the matching cpu
cooling devices).
This patch also removes redundant check (max_freq > policy->user_policy.max),
as cpufreq framework takes care of user_policy constraints already where ever
required, otherwise its causing an issue while increasing max_freq in normal
scenerio as it restores max_freq with policy->user_policy.max which is old
(smaller) value.
Signed-off-by: Yadwinder Singh Brar <yadi.brar@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
There is no longer need to share defines between exynos_tmu.c
and exynos_tmu_data.c (as they are now only used by the former
file) so move them accordingly. Then move externs for struct
exynos_tmu_init_data instances to exynos_tmu.h and remove no
longer needed exynos_tmu_data.h include.
There should be no functional changes caused by this patch.
Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Cc: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Maximum theoretical size saving (i.e. with only Exynos5410
SoC support enabled in kernel config so all SoC dependend
Exynos thermal driver code was dropped) is 4096 bytes so
there is no much sense in keeping these ifdefs (especially
given that they are useless once the driver gets updated to
use device tree).
While at it remove needless 'void *' casts.
There should be no functional changes caused by this patch.
Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Cc: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Replace TMU_SUPPORT_ADDRESS_MULTIPLE flag check in exynos_map_dt_data()
by an explicit check for a SoC type (only Exynos5420 with TRIMINFO
quirk and Exynos5440 have TMU_SUPPORT_ADDRESS_MULTIPLE flag set in
their struct exynos_tmu_init_data instances).
Please note that this requires moving SoC type assignment and verification
from exynos_tmu_probe() to exynos_map_dt_data() so it happens earlier
(which is a good thing in itself).
There should be no functional changes caused by this patch.
Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Cc: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Replace TMU_SUPPORT_FALLING_TRIP flag check in
exynos[4210,5440]_tmu_control() by an explicit check
for a SoC type (all SoC types except Exynos4210 have
TMU_SUPPORT_FALLING_TRIP flag set in their struct
exynos_tmu_init_data instances).
There should be no functional changes caused by this patch.
Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Cc: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Add ->tmu_clear_irqs method to struct exynos_tmu_data and use
it instead exynos_tmu_clear_irqs(). Then add ->tmu_clear_irqs
implementations for Exynos4210+ and Exynos5440. Finally
remove no longer needed reg->tmu_int[stat,clear] abstractions
and struct exynos_tmu_registers instances.
There should be no functional changes caused by this patch.
Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Cc: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
