struct intel_dpll_hw_state has a spot for all possible
PLL registers across all platforms (well, apart from
cx0/snps). This makes it rather confusing when trying to
figure out which members belong to which platform(s).
Split the struct up into five different platform specific
sub-structures. For now this will actually increase the size
a little bit as we have to duplicate a few members from
skl to icl, but that will be remedied soon when we turn
the thing into a union.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240412182703.19916-17-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Rename PIPECONF to TRANSCONF to make it clear what it actually
applies to.
While the usual convention is to pick the earliers name I think
in this case it's more clear to use the later name. Especially
as even the register offset is in the wrong range (0x70000 vs.
0x60000) and thus makes it look like this is per-pipe.
There is one place in gvt that's doing something with TRANSCONF
while iterating with for_each_pipe(). So that might not be doing
the right thing for TRANSCODER_EDP, dunno. Not knowing what it
does I left it as is to avoid breakage.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230213225258.2127-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Name the CPU transcoder timing registers TRANS_FOO rather than
just FOO. This is the modern name, after the pipe/transcoder split
happened. Makes it a bit more obvious whether you pass in a pipe or
a transcoder.
PIPESRC is a bit special as it's a pipe register, even though it
lives in the transcoder registers range (0x60000 instead of 0x70000).
And BCLRPAT I suppose is a transcoder register (since it has something
to do with the timing generator), but it doesn't even exist after gen4
so I left it to use the only name it ever had in bspec.
And while at it let's pass in the correct enum in few more
places why don't we. Although in all those places the distinction
doesn't matter.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230213225258.2127-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Turns out many of the files that need i915_reg.h get it implicitly via
{display/intel_de.h, gt/intel_context.h} -> i915_trace.h -> i915_irq.h
-> i915_reg.h. Since i915_trace.h doesn't actually need i915_irq.h,
makes sense to drop it, but that requires adding quite a few new
includes all over the place.
Prefer including i915_reg.h where needed instead of adding another
implicit include, because eventually we'll want to split up i915_reg.h
and only include the specific registers at each place.
Also some places actually needed i915_irq.h too.
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/6e78a2e0ac1bffaf5af3b5ccc21dff05e6518cef.1668008071.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Nuke the hsw_get_ddi_port_state() eyesore by putting the
readout code into intel_pch_display.c, and calling it directly
from hsw_crt_get_config().
Note that the nuked TRANS_DDI_FUNC_CTL readout from
hsw_get_ddi_port_state() is now etirely redundant since we
get called from the encoder->get_config() so we already know
we're dealing with the correct DDI port. Previously the
code was called from a place where that wasn't known so
it had to checked manually.
v2: Clarify the TRANS_DDI_FUNC_CTL change (Dave)
Nuke the now unused *TRANS_DDI_FUNC_CTL_VAL_TO_PORT() (Dave)
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211018153525.21597-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
