We don't use the block size information for the clear color
plane. Technically the entire fb is the single block for the
single 64B clear color surface, so there is just no way to
delcare that as a constant since the fb size can be anything.
Define the clear color block size as 0x0 to make things less
confusing. We already declared that cpp/chars_per_block=0 for
the clear color as well. That also causes the drm core code
to mostly ignore the clear color plane, which is exactly
what we want since that code doesn't know how to deal with
the clear color plane.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240918144445.5716-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
I don't think the display hardware really has such chroma
plane tile row alignment requirements as outlined in
commit d156135e6a ("drm/i915/tgl: Make sure a semiplanar
UV plane is tile row size aligned")
Bspec had the same exact thing to say about earlier hardware
as well, but we never cared and things work just fine.
The one thing mentioned in that commit that is definitely
true however is the fence alignment issue. But we don't
deal with that on earlier hardware either. We do have code
to deal with that issue for the first color plane, but not
the chroma planes. So I think if we did want to check this
more extensively we should do it in the same places where
we already check the first color plane (namely
convert_plane_offset_to_xy() and intel_fb_bo_framebuffer_init()).
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240612204712.31404-10-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Different planes could have different alignment requirements
even for the same format/modifier. Collect the alignment
requirements across all planes capable of scanning out the
fb such that the alignment is satisfactory to all those
planes.
So far this was sort of handled by making sure intel_surf_alignment()
declares the superset of all planes' alignment requirements,
but maintaining that manually is annoying. So we're going to move
towards each plane declaring only its own requirements, and thus
we need code to generate the superset.
v2: Drop the borked per-plane vma optimization (Imre)
Assert that the plane's declared alignment is POT (Imre)
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240612204712.31404-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Different hardware generations have different scanout alignment
requirements. Introduce a new vfunc that will allow us to
make that distinction without horrible if-ladders.
For now we directly plug in the existing intel_surf_alignment()
and intel_cursor_alignment() functions.
For fbdev we (temporarily) introduce intel_fbdev_min_alignment()
that simply queries the alignment from the primary plane of
the first crtc.
TODO: someone will need to fix xe's alignment handling
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240612204712.31404-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
On ADL+ the hardware automagically calculates the CCS AUX surface
stride from the main surface stride, so when remapping we can't
really play a lot of tricks with the main surface stride, or else
the AUX surface stride would get miscalculated and no longer
match the actual data layout in memory.
Supposedly we could remap in 256 main surface tile units
(AUX page(4096)/cachline(64)*4(4x1 main surface tiles per
AUX cacheline)=256 main surface tiles), but the extra complexity
is probably not worth the hassle.
So let's just make sure our mapping stride is calculated from
the full framebuffer stride (instead of the framebuffer width).
This way the stride we program into PLANE_STRIDE will be the
original framebuffer stride, and thus there will be no change
to the AUX stride/layout.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231205180308.7505-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
- Improve display debug msgs and other general clean-ups (Ville, Rahuul)
- PSR fixes and improvements around selective fetch (Jouni, Ville)
- Remove FBC restrictions for Xe2LPD displays (Vinod)
- Skip some timing checks on BXT/GLK DSI transcoders (Ville)
- DP MST Fixes (Ville)
- Correct the input parameter on _intel_dsb_commit (heminhong)
- Fix IP version of the display WAs (Bala)
- DGFX uses direct VBT pin mapping (Clint)
- Proper handling of bool on PIPE_CONF_CHECK macros (Jani)
- Skip state verification with TBT-ALT mod (Mika Kahona)
- General organization of display code for reusage with Xe
(Jouni, Luca, Jani, Maarten)
- Squelch a sparse warning (Jani)
- Don't use "proxy" headers (Andy Shevchenko)
- Use devm_gpiod_get() for all GPIOs (Hans)
- Fix ADL+ tiled plane stride (Ville)
- Use octal permissions in display debugfs (Jani)
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/ZXIWG6bRYaUw0w6-@intel.com
plane_view_scanout_stride() currently assumes that we had to pad the
mapping stride with dummy pages in order to align it. But that is not
the case if the original fb stride exceeds the aligned stride used
to populate the remapped view, which is calculated from the user
specified framebuffer width rather than the user specified framebuffer
stride.
Ignore the original fb stride in this case and just stick to the POT
aligned stride. Getting this wrong will cause the plane to fetch the
wrong data, and can lead to fault errors if the page tables at the
bogus location aren't even populated.
TODO: figure out if this is OK for CCS, or if we should instead increase
the width of the view to cover the entire user specified fb stride
instead...
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231204202443.31247-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com>
We are preparing for Xe driver. Backing object implementation is differing
between i915 and Xe. Split i915 specific code into separate source file
built only for i915.
v9:
- Use ERR_CAST
v8:
- return original error code from intel_fb_bo_lookup_valid_bo on failure
v7:
- drop #include <drm/drm_plane.h>
- s/user_mode_cmd/mode_cmd/
- Use passed i915 pointer instead of to_i915(obj->base.dev)
v6: Add missing intel_fb_bo.[ch]
v5:
- Keep drm_any_plane_has_format check in intel_fb.c
- Use mode_cmd instead of user_mode_cmd for intel_fb_bo_lookup_valid_bo
v4: Move drm_any_plane_has_format check into intel_fb_bo.c
v3: Fix failure handling in intel_framebuffer_init
v2: Couple of fixes to error value handling
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231203114840.841311-5-jouni.hogander@intel.com
The functions drm_framebuffer_plane_{width,height} and
fb_plane_{width,height} do exactly the same job of its
equivalents drm_format_info_plane_{width,height} from drm_fourcc.
The only reason to have these functions on drm_framebuffer
would be if they would added a abstraction layer to call it just
passing a drm_framebuffer pointer and the desired plane index,
which is not the case, where these functions actually implements
just part of it. In the actual implementation, every call to both
drm_framebuffer_plane_{width,height} and fb_plane_{width,height} should
pass some drm_framebuffer attribute, which is the same as calling the
drm_format_info_plane_{width,height} functions.
The drm_format_info_pane_{width,height} functions are much more
consistent in both its implementation and its location on code. The
kind of calculation that they do is intrinsically derivated from the
drm_format_info struct and has not to do with drm_framebuffer, except
by the potential motivation described above, which is still not a good
justification to have drm_framebuffer functions to calculate it.
So, replace each drm_framebuffer_plane_{width,height} and
fb_plane_{width,height} call to drm_format_info_plane_{width,height}
and remove them.
Signed-off-by: Carlos Eduardo Gallo Filho <gcarlos@disroot.org>
Reviewed-by: André Almeida <andrealmeid@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230926141519.9315-3-gcarlos@disroot.org
Take into account dma fences in dirtyfb callback. If there is no
unsignaled dma fences perform flush immediately. If there are
unsignaled dma fences perform invalidate and add callback which will
queue flush when the fence gets signaled.
v4:
- Move invalidate before callback is added
v3:
- Check frontbuffer bits before adding any fence fb
- Flush only when adding fence cb succeeds
v2: Use dma_resv_get_singleton
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230901093500.3463046-5-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Split out frontbuffer related declarations and static inlines from
gem/i915_gem_object.h into new gem/i915_gem_object_frontbuffer.h.
The main goal is to reduce header interdependencies. With
gem/i915_gem_object.h including display/intel_frontbuffer.h,
modification of the latter causes a whopping 300+ objects to be rebuilt,
while many of the source files actually needing it aren't explicitly
including it at all.
After the change, only 21 objects depend on display/intel_frontbuffer.h,
directly or indirectly.
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230830085127.2416842-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
